Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org)
Home > Some Little Known Reasons Why France Is on the Frontline of the War
With the Islamic State
________________________________________
Some Little Known Reasons Why France Is on the Frontline of the War With the
Islamic State
By Nafeez Ahmed [1] / AlterNet [2]
July 15, 2016
At least 84, perhaps up to 100 people, have been killed in the horrifying
attack in Nice, France.
In the latest of a series of terrorist attacks in the country over recent
years, a truck mowed down crowds of people who had gathered in celebration.
Automatic gunfire from the truck killed further civilians as it ploughed
through the crowd.
Muslim friends of mine in France and other parts of Europe, were at a loss
to convey the terror and confusion experienced by their own friends and
family who witnessed the carnage.
They described the unfathomable shock of seeing bloodied bodies scattered
across the ground, like a warzone. One said that members of her family were
at the scene, celebrating Bastille day with their fellow French citizens.
They were in Nice on holiday. They could not believe what had happened. They
spoke repeatedly of bodies everywhere, many of them wearing headscarves.
So far, facts are thin. Police sources confirmed that the driver, Mohamed
Lahouaiej Bouhlel, was native Tunisian and French resident, a conclusion
drawn from identity papers found in the vehicle. The suspect was known to
authorities, though only for theft and thuggery, not terrorism.
Some witnesses said they heard the driver shout 'Allah hu Akbar' during the
attack.
Officials early on confirmed that a cache of replica weapons were found
inside the truck, though the attacker did have an automatic pistol.
So what can we infer with some degree of certainty?
Pieces of the puzzle
Firstly, Islamic State has not formally claimed responsibility for this
attack, suggesting the attack wasn't directed from IS headquarters. It was,
however, celebrated in glee by IS-linked social media accounts.
Secondly, despite this, the lone wolf hypothesis is not plausible. The cache
of replica weapons and an automatic pistol suggests some connection with a
nexus of organized crime and/or organized network against the French state.
He also, clearly, knew how to fire an automatic weapon, suggesting some
degree - even if minimal - of firearms training. He probably had
accomplices.
Third, President Hollande's declaration - "We will continue striking those
who attack us on our own soil" - is a not-so-veiled reference to France's
involvement in airstrikes in Syria against IS. Hollande's statement reflects
what the French security services already believe to be the strongest
hypothesis. That even if this was not Daesh-directed, it was Daesh-inspired.
Fourth, French authorities knew an attack of this sort was going to happen.
For some years, of course, both al-Qaeda affiliated groups and IS have
repeatedly urged their followers around the world to use trucks and cars as
weapons. But the French have had more specific intelligence.
On Tuesday, the parliamentary testimony of DGSI general director Patrick
Calvar - the chief of France's domestic security service - was published in
a 300-page official report. In his testimony, given on 24 May, Calvar
warned: "I'm convinced they'll go to booby-trapped vehicles and bombs, thus
upping their power."
Fifth, as the latest in a string of escalating terrorist attacks on France,
the Nice attack must be seen as part of a continuum of terrorist violence,
not simply as a single episode. In that context, whatever the French state
response to previous terrorist attacks - the state of emergency, the
escalation of airstrikes in Syria, and so on - has, without mincing words,
failed dismally.
Sixth, we can be reasonably sure that the Nice attack, like the attacks
before it, has been incubated by a Daesh-inspired network in France with
access to criminal black market supply lines, that remains entirely
operational, despite the French government's efforts.
And this fact, alone, opens up a wider geopolitical can of worms, leading to
our seventh point of reasonable certainty: to understand how and why this
network has been able to continue existing with its tentacles reaching into
a minority of the French Muslim communities - it must be remembered that
many of the victims of the Nice attacks were French Muslims who despise
Daesh - we cannot but recognise that there is real, localised and regional
problem here.
The 'war on Islamic State' you've never heard of
President Hollande's reference to Daesh in Syria, in this regard, misses the
mark. Because France is not just waging war in Syria. France is waging war
much closer to home, precisely where this criminal black market supply
network links up: North Africa.
This is the eighth point: The persistence with which France is being
targeted can only be explained by the escalation of a secretive war with
Daesh being carried out just across the border in the Maghreb.
Over the last half decade, Islamist militant factions affiliated to both the
Islamic State and al-Qaeda have dramatically expanded their foothold in
North Africa. Spurred by the vacuum left from the aborted NATO war on Libya,
which successfully ousted Gaddafi but left the country in a state of
internecine civil war, Islamist groups have found a new base there.
Libya is now the perfect springboard for Islamist militants to expand their
reach across North Africa and the Sahel.
The result is patchwork of rapidly growing cells of jihadists loyal to
multiple terrorist franchises: Ansar al-Shariah, Al Mourabitoun, Boko Haram,
al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, and Islamic State.
The militants have also set up shop in Mali, even more so in the wake of
France's intervention there. Launched in 2013 to rollback an Islamist
militant uprising in the north, the intervention has converted into a
semi-colonial arrangement.
France now has a permanent military presence in Mali, but as Human Rights
Watch finds in its World Report 2016, security continues to deteriorate with
increased attacks from Islamist groups and abuses by Mali government forces.
The French military presence has seen an intensification of Islamic
violence, which has "increased in the north and spread into central and
southern Mali", according to HRW.
But the brutality of the France-backed Mali regime has only served to
vindicate the Islamists.
France's war has swept across the region. There are now about 3,500 French
troops stationed across military bases in Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Burkina
Faso and Chad, which is the command and control hub for a regional
American-French military-security complex.
In addition to the French, US Special Operations forces are engaged in a
secret program to establish elite counterterrorism units in Niger, Mali,
Mauritania and Libya.
But as noted in Foreign Affairs by Nathaniel Powell, a specialist in the
history of French military interventions, this operation "may be doing more
harm than good, since it provides crucial support to the repressive
governments that are at the heart of the Sahel's problems."
Before Daesh: Destabilising the Sahel
The US-led security architecture was established across the Sahel long
before the rise of IS. In fact, US involvement has significantly expanded
the Islamist hold in the region.
Professor Jeremy Keenan, a world authority on the Sahara-Sahel region from
the School of Oriental and African Studies, points out [3] that this
security architecture, now under the jurisdiction of the Pentagon's AFRICOM,
was set-up over a decade ago in the form of a "cooperation agreement on
counter-terrorism" between Algeria, Niger, Nigeria, and Chad. The agreement
"effectively joined the two oil-rich sides of the Sahara together in a
complex of security arrangements whose architecture is American."
Intelligence documents, as Keenan and others have documented, prove that at
this time, the US, British and French were well aware that Algerian military
intelligence had played a double-game, covertly financing al-Qaeda
affiliated militants as a mechanism to consolidate its domestic control, and
project power abroad.
In January 2013, as France launched its war in Mali, former National
Security Agency counterintelligence officer John Schindler said [4] that
there was "ample evidence" that Algerian intelligence "maintains control of
at least some of the jihadist bandit-groups operating under the rubric of
al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) across the Sahel."
According to Keenan, who advises the US State Department and British Foreign
Office on regional security issues, this extensive support for regional
al-Qaeda bandits spilled over [5] into what became the Islamist uprising in
Mali.
But instead of cracking down hard on Algeria's state-sponsorship of Islamist
terror, the US and British turned a blind eye, and the French invaded Mali.
In the wake of the Anglo-French military presence across the region, far
from being quelled, Islamists are having a field day.
The French are trying to patrol a smuggling route to Libya, which is a major
regional black market weapons hub controlled by Islamist groups. But the
area of operations spans a whopping 15,000 square miles. No wonder these
operations have few concrete successes.
Ongoing secretive operations and draconian abuses, along with extensive
support for repressive regimes, one of which - Algeria - directly sponsored
some of the Islamist factions running riot across the region, serves to
stoke local grievances, but does little to shut down the terror networks.
Grievances?
As foreign fighters pour in, recruited to various competing groups, the
American-French trans-Sahel military operation is fighting a losing battle.
Ongoing grievances in the region are a powerful recruiting sergeant for
these terrorist groups. Corrupt governments and intensifying poverty, amidst
burgeoning young populations, have created a groundswell of resentment
against the status quo. In this vacuum, the preaching of religious clerics
aligned to al-Qaeda and IS has an increasingly willing audience.
The US-French support for the region's repressive governments, in the name
of counter-terrorism, stokes further resentment.
This leads to the ninth fact: Inside France, these grievances are mirrored
as the French security state has disproportionately targeted ordinary French
Muslims during its now-extended state of emergency.
A February briefing by Amnesty International found that the emergency
measures "are implemented in a discriminatory manner, specifically targeting
Muslims, often on the basis of their beliefs and religious practices rather
than any concrete evidence of criminal behaviour."
More than 3,242 house searches had been conducted and over 400 assigned
residence orders imposed - with little, if any, tangible outcome in terms of
intelligence successes against terrorism. Mosques had been shut down despite
police reports indicating "no element justifying the opening of an
investigation."
Instead, the French government has "trampled on the rights of hundreds of
men, women and children, leaving them traumatised and stigmatised," said the
Amnesty report.
As the Nice attack proves, this draconian approach has done nothing to help
French authorities stop terrorism.
The result is that already marginalised Muslim communities in France are
experiencing routine state abuses. For most of the people in these
communities, this stops there.
But for a minority - perhaps like the Nice attacker - state abuses lend
credence to the claims of al-Qaeda and Daesh-sympathisers: claims that
Muslims are not welcome in the West, that they are obliged to join the jihad
against the West, that they must migrate to the Islamic State - and that if
they don't, they are apostates who are as worthy of death as their
non-Muslim counterparts.
Our tenth point of fact, then, is that this escalating war, occurring not
just in Syria, but stretching from Libya across North Africa, is an ideal
recruiting sergeant for the ideology of terror that animates these
jihadists: if you are not with us, you are against us.
It is critical to remember what this means: Daesh wants to destroy the
greyzone, the arenas of multi-ethnic, multi-faith solidarity, within both
the Muslim and Western worlds. Muslims who continue to partake of the
greyzone are deemed apostates who, in particular, must be made an example
of. And they must be made an example of especially while partaking of the
greyzone - exactly as happened in the Nice attack, where people of all
backgrounds and various faiths, and none, were celebrating together.
This leads me to my final point: We must not allow Daesh to win by
endangering the greyzone ourselves. In such a time of crisis, a reactionary
approach may seem attractive, but the last few years proves that it bears
little fruit. In reality, the greyzone represents precisely what
distinguishes 'us' from the terrorists: we love each other, no matter what.
And we will stand together, no matter what.
Nafeez Ahmed [6] is an investigative journalist and international security
scholar. He writes the System Shift column for VICE's Motherboard, and is
the winner of a 2015 Project Censored Award for Outstanding Investigative
Journalism for his former work at the Guardian. He is the author of A User's
Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It [7] (2010), and the
scifi thriller novel Zero Point [8], among other books.
Share on Facebook Share
Share on Twitter Tweet
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. [9]
[10]
________________________________________
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/world/some-little-known-reasons-why-france-frontline
-war-islamic-state
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/nafeez-ahmed-0
[2] http://alternet.org
[3]
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/africa/2014/04/10/The-U-S-Algeria
n-security-pact-secretly-strengthening-al-Qaeda-.html
[4] http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/algerias-hidden-hand-7994?page=1
[5] https://newint.org/features/2012/12/01/us-terrorism-sahara/
[6] http://www.nafeezahmed.com
[7] http://www.crisisofcivilization.com
[8] http://zro.pt
[9] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Some Little Known
Reasons Why France Is on the Frontline of the War With the Islamic State
[10] http://www.alternet.org/
[11] http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org)
Home > Some Little Known Reasons Why France Is on the Frontline of the War
With the Islamic State
Some Little Known Reasons Why France Is on the Frontline of the War With the
Islamic State
By Nafeez Ahmed [1] / AlterNet [2]
July 15, 2016
AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to Google+More
AddThis Share optionsShare to Email
At least 84, perhaps up to 100 people, have been killed in the horrifying
attack in Nice, France.
In the latest of a series of terrorist attacks in the country over recent
years, a truck mowed down crowds of people who had gathered in celebration.
Automatic gunfire from the truck killed further civilians as it ploughed
through the crowd.
Muslim friends of mine in France and other parts of Europe, were at a loss
to convey the terror and confusion experienced by their own friends and
family who witnessed the carnage.
They described the unfathomable shock of seeing bloodied bodies scattered
across the ground, like a warzone. One said that members of her family were
at the scene, celebrating Bastille day with their fellow French citizens.
They were in Nice on holiday. They could not believe what had happened. They
spoke repeatedly of bodies everywhere, many of them wearing headscarves.
So far, facts are thin. Police sources confirmed that the driver, Mohamed
Lahouaiej Bouhlel, was native Tunisian and French resident, a conclusion
drawn from identity papers found in the vehicle. The suspect was known to
authorities, though only for theft and thuggery, not terrorism.
Some witnesses said they heard the driver shout 'Allah hu Akbar' during the
attack.
Officials early on confirmed that a cache of replica weapons were found
inside the truck, though the attacker did have an automatic pistol.
So what can we infer with some degree of certainty?
Pieces of the puzzle
Firstly, Islamic State has not formally claimed responsibility for this
attack, suggesting the attack wasn't directed from IS headquarters. It was,
however, celebrated in glee by IS-linked social media accounts.
Secondly, despite this, the lone wolf hypothesis is not plausible. The cache
of replica weapons and an automatic pistol suggests some connection with a
nexus of organized crime and/or organized network against the French state.
He also, clearly, knew how to fire an automatic weapon, suggesting some
degree - even if minimal - of firearms training. He probably had
accomplices.
Third, President Hollande's declaration - "We will continue striking those
who attack us on our own soil" - is a not-so-veiled reference to France's
involvement in airstrikes in Syria against IS. Hollande's statement reflects
what the French security services already believe to be the strongest
hypothesis. That even if this was not Daesh-directed, it was Daesh-inspired.
Fourth, French authorities knew an attack of this sort was going to happen.
For some years, of course, both al-Qaeda affiliated groups and IS have
repeatedly urged their followers around the world to use trucks and cars as
weapons. But the French have had more specific intelligence.
On Tuesday, the parliamentary testimony of DGSI general director Patrick
Calvar - the chief of France's domestic security service - was published in
a 300-page official report. In his testimony, given on 24 May, Calvar
warned: "I'm convinced they'll go to booby-trapped vehicles and bombs, thus
upping their power."
Fifth, as the latest in a string of escalating terrorist attacks on France,
the Nice attack must be seen as part of a continuum of terrorist violence,
not simply as a single episode. In that context, whatever the French state
response to previous terrorist attacks - the state of emergency, the
escalation of airstrikes in Syria, and so on - has, without mincing words,
failed dismally.
Sixth, we can be reasonably sure that the Nice attack, like the attacks
before it, has been incubated by a Daesh-inspired network in France with
access to criminal black market supply lines, that remains entirely
operational, despite the French government's efforts.
And this fact, alone, opens up a wider geopolitical can of worms, leading to
our seventh point of reasonable certainty: to understand how and why this
network has been able to continue existing with its tentacles reaching into
a minority of the French Muslim communities - it must be remembered that
many of the victims of the Nice attacks were French Muslims who despise
Daesh - we cannot but recognise that there is real, localised and regional
problem here.
The 'war on Islamic State' you've never heard of
President Hollande's reference to Daesh in Syria, in this regard, misses the
mark. Because France is not just waging war in Syria. France is waging war
much closer to home, precisely where this criminal black market supply
network links up: North Africa.
This is the eighth point: The persistence with which France is being
targeted can only be explained by the escalation of a secretive war with
Daesh being carried out just across the border in the Maghreb.
Over the last half decade, Islamist militant factions affiliated to both the
Islamic State and al-Qaeda have dramatically expanded their foothold in
North Africa. Spurred by the vacuum left from the aborted NATO war on Libya,
which successfully ousted Gaddafi but left the country in a state of
internecine civil war, Islamist groups have found a new base there.
Libya is now the perfect springboard for Islamist militants to expand their
reach across North Africa and the Sahel.
The result is patchwork of rapidly growing cells of jihadists loyal to
multiple terrorist franchises: Ansar al-Shariah, Al Mourabitoun, Boko Haram,
al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, and Islamic State.
The militants have also set up shop in Mali, even more so in the wake of
France's intervention there. Launched in 2013 to rollback an Islamist
militant uprising in the north, the intervention has converted into a
semi-colonial arrangement.
France now has a permanent military presence in Mali, but as Human Rights
Watch finds in its World Report 2016, security continues to deteriorate with
increased attacks from Islamist groups and abuses by Mali government forces.
The French military presence has seen an intensification of Islamic
violence, which has "increased in the north and spread into central and
southern Mali", according to HRW.
But the brutality of the France-backed Mali regime has only served to
vindicate the Islamists.
France's war has swept across the region. There are now about 3,500 French
troops stationed across military bases in Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Burkina
Faso and Chad, which is the command and control hub for a regional
American-French military-security complex.
In addition to the French, US Special Operations forces are engaged in a
secret program to establish elite counterterrorism units in Niger, Mali,
Mauritania and Libya.
But as noted in Foreign Affairs by Nathaniel Powell, a specialist in the
history of French military interventions, this operation "may be doing more
harm than good, since it provides crucial support to the repressive
governments that are at the heart of the Sahel's problems."
Before Daesh: Destabilising the Sahel
The US-led security architecture was established across the Sahel long
before the rise of IS. In fact, US involvement has significantly expanded
the Islamist hold in the region.
Professor Jeremy Keenan, a world authority on the Sahara-Sahel region from
the School of Oriental and African Studies, points out [3] that this
security architecture, now under the jurisdiction of the Pentagon's AFRICOM,
was set-up over a decade ago in the form of a "cooperation agreement on
counter-terrorism" between Algeria, Niger, Nigeria, and Chad. The agreement
"effectively joined the two oil-rich sides of the Sahara together in a
complex of security arrangements whose architecture is American."
Intelligence documents, as Keenan and others have documented, prove that at
this time, the US, British and French were well aware that Algerian military
intelligence had played a double-game, covertly financing al-Qaeda
affiliated militants as a mechanism to consolidate its domestic control, and
project power abroad.
In January 2013, as France launched its war in Mali, former National
Security Agency counterintelligence officer John Schindler said [4] that
there was "ample evidence" that Algerian intelligence "maintains control of
at least some of the jihadist bandit-groups operating under the rubric of
al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) across the Sahel."
According to Keenan, who advises the US State Department and British Foreign
Office on regional security issues, this extensive support for regional
al-Qaeda bandits spilled over [5] into what became the Islamist uprising in
Mali.
But instead of cracking down hard on Algeria's state-sponsorship of Islamist
terror, the US and British turned a blind eye, and the French invaded Mali.
In the wake of the Anglo-French military presence across the region, far
from being quelled, Islamists are having a field day.
The French are trying to patrol a smuggling route to Libya, which is a major
regional black market weapons hub controlled by Islamist groups. But the
area of operations spans a whopping 15,000 square miles. No wonder these
operations have few concrete successes.
Ongoing secretive operations and draconian abuses, along with extensive
support for repressive regimes, one of which - Algeria - directly sponsored
some of the Islamist factions running riot across the region, serves to
stoke local grievances, but does little to shut down the terror networks.
Grievances?
As foreign fighters pour in, recruited to various competing groups, the
American-French trans-Sahel military operation is fighting a losing battle.
Ongoing grievances in the region are a powerful recruiting sergeant for
these terrorist groups. Corrupt governments and intensifying poverty, amidst
burgeoning young populations, have created a groundswell of resentment
against the status quo. In this vacuum, the preaching of religious clerics
aligned to al-Qaeda and IS has an increasingly willing audience.
The US-French support for the region's repressive governments, in the name
of counter-terrorism, stokes further resentment.
This leads to the ninth fact: Inside France, these grievances are mirrored
as the French security state has disproportionately targeted ordinary French
Muslims during its now-extended state of emergency.
A February briefing by Amnesty International found that the emergency
measures "are implemented in a discriminatory manner, specifically targeting
Muslims, often on the basis of their beliefs and religious practices rather
than any concrete evidence of criminal behaviour."
More than 3,242 house searches had been conducted and over 400 assigned
residence orders imposed - with little, if any, tangible outcome in terms of
intelligence successes against terrorism. Mosques had been shut down despite
police reports indicating "no element justifying the opening of an
investigation."
Instead, the French government has "trampled on the rights of hundreds of
men, women and children, leaving them traumatised and stigmatised," said the
Amnesty report.
As the Nice attack proves, this draconian approach has done nothing to help
French authorities stop terrorism.
The result is that already marginalised Muslim communities in France are
experiencing routine state abuses. For most of the people in these
communities, this stops there.
But for a minority - perhaps like the Nice attacker - state abuses lend
credence to the claims of al-Qaeda and Daesh-sympathisers: claims that
Muslims are not welcome in the West, that they are obliged to join the jihad
against the West, that they must migrate to the Islamic State - and that if
they don't, they are apostates who are as worthy of death as their
non-Muslim counterparts.
Our tenth point of fact, then, is that this escalating war, occurring not
just in Syria, but stretching from Libya across North Africa, is an ideal
recruiting sergeant for the ideology of terror that animates these
jihadists: if you are not with us, you are against us.
It is critical to remember what this means: Daesh wants to destroy the
greyzone, the arenas of multi-ethnic, multi-faith solidarity, within both
the Muslim and Western worlds. Muslims who continue to partake of the
greyzone are deemed apostates who, in particular, must be made an example
of. And they must be made an example of especially while partaking of the
greyzone - exactly as happened in the Nice attack, where people of all
backgrounds and various faiths, and none, were celebrating together.
This leads me to my final point: We must not allow Daesh to win by
endangering the greyzone ourselves. In such a time of crisis, a reactionary
approach may seem attractive, but the last few years proves that it bears
little fruit. In reality, the greyzone represents precisely what
distinguishes 'us' from the terrorists: we love each other, no matter what.
And we will stand together, no matter what.
Nafeez Ahmed [6] is an investigative journalist and international security
scholar. He writes the System Shift column for VICE's Motherboard, and is
the winner of a 2015 Project Censored Award for Outstanding Investigative
Journalism for his former work at the Guardian. He is the author of A User's
Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It [7] (2010), and the
scifi thriller novel Zero Point [8], among other books.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. [9]
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.[10]
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/world/some-little-known-reasons-why-france-frontline
-war-islamic-state
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/nafeez-ahmed-0
[2] http://alternet.org
[3]
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/africa/2014/04/10/The-U-S-Algeria
n-security-pact-secretly-strengthening-al-Qaeda-.html
[4] http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/algerias-hidden-hand-7994?page=1
[5] https://newint.org/features/2012/12/01/us-terrorism-sahara/
[6] http://www.nafeezahmed.com
[7] http://www.crisisofcivilization.com
[8] http://zro.pt
[9] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Some Little Known
Reasons Why France Is on the Frontline of the War With the Islamic State
[10] http://www.alternet.org/
[11] http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
