I think it was John W. Campbell who said, "A difference that makes no
difference is no difference." I can look at the doctrine of various
religions and see differences, but I have yet to see a difference that
makes a difference. So is there really any difference?
---
Christopher Hitchens
??? What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without
evidence. ???
??? Christopher Hitchens,
On 4/30/2019 10:51 AM, Carl Jarvis wrote:
Mostafa,
The popular cartoon, Charlie Brown, was made into a number of TV
Shows. When the children talked, we could understand what they were
saying. But whenever an adult character spoke, it sounded like, "Blah
Blah Blah".
The fact that English is not your original language, coupled with the
fact that you feel the need to dazzle your readers with "Big" words,
makes it almost impossible to follow your thoughts.
But here is an interesting observation, Mostafa, in your vain attempt
to "prove" your God exists, you rant exactly like those White
Christian Supremacists who spew out their hatred over American TV and
Radio channels.
Your pontificating brings me to pondering a point. Has the
development of language made it almost impossible for humans to
communicate on the Spiritual level? By Spiritual, I am referring to
our deep emotional side.
Nonetheless, I remind you that a closed mind is like a closed book;
within its covers there may be great wisdom, but until the book is
opened the wisdom will remain hidden and ignored.
Mostafa, you do not need to continue insulting my beliefs in order to
defend yours. Our experiences are so different that we will never
agree on Spiritual matters. I accept that you believe your Allah
exists and tells you what to think. My experiences tell me that it is
up to me to be in charge of myself. Still, we can explore other
areas, such as whether Humans can come together and save our Planet
Earth before we render it unlivable.
I believe that in spite of our many flaws, Humans are worth saving.
And our Planet Earth, with all its abundance of life, is worth
protecting. Allah and God appear too busy to do the job. Or perhaps
they are telling you that it doesn't matter, since your life will be
an eternal existence in the Make Believe Next Life.
Carl Jarvis
On 4/29/19, Mostafa Almahdy <mostafa.almahdy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I prefer to initially proceed into my exposure of American democracy
than wheeling in a meaningless vicious cycle with some bunch of
unworthy mortals. I'd just roast and sternly inculpate them later.
I'll do this at the last of my series of comments. CNN writes, "After
a barrage of criticism, the New York Times said Sunday it was deeply
sorry about publishing an anti-Semitic cartoon depicting Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a dog on a leash held by a blind
featuring Trump." Hmm, if I drew this portrayal, I would have made the
scene perfectly inverted. I still like it though. Following Trump's
speech to NRA gathering in Indiana, a mass shooting has erupted at a
Californian Tabernacle. Trump has roiled the NRA to react after
accusing New York attorney general of illegally investigating them.
With its substantially financial abundance, the pro gun lobby bribes
even gaffers of oval office. This reverberates the greed ascendancy
over law enforcement. This tangible symbol signifies the scurrilous
disposal of America. The San Diego Synagogue shooting plainly
designates American's unprecedented infatuation with firearms.
Reportedly, one of the Synagogue's attendants had his weapon with him.
Why? This means that Americans in general do not feel safe, despite
where they are. If people are allowed to enter anywhere with their
firearms, and that includes schools, Churches and Temples, that's of
completely incomparable dementia. According to headlines, he chased
the shooter to his vehicle and attempted to shoot him over. It somehow
seemes to me, that it had been a gun battle. This is concurrently odd
and insane. How has someone thought of entering a house of worship
armed and what for? American people are mentally deranged. As for
Roger, he ultimately admitted, that he doesn't know the specifics
concerning theological issues. I thought he read a book about the
Koran. Roger said and I quote, "I was only making an
assumption. That is the one about the authorship of the Koran." I
changed the spelling of the last term because it better fits how it's
pronounced in Arabic. Now, Roger seemingly lied about reading an
anonymous textbook about the Koran. He confessed, that he based what
he said on mere assumptions. This admission has coercively been
unveiled after I repeatedly, asked Roger the kidder to name the
unidentified textbook which he allegedly said he read. Just as the
Biology degree, the book doesn't exist. I then see Carl recalling his
not so favourable experience with the Christian faith. He thereupon
poses irreligious misconceptions based on that. Furthermore, Roger
mentioned a pastor who became Atheist. Nonetheless, he hid his actual
belief and continued preaching. This proves my theory, that faith in
the west is wholly inactive. Someone doesn't have to quit his
preaching. They mostly do this for living therein. Roger is environed
by some bunch of religiously irreverent folks. Their experience may
broadly vary but they are nesciently. They are stereotypically
skeptical. Roger bases his prejudiced notion about faith on
assumptions. This is an explicit expenditure of circular reasoning, a
logical method which he insistently considered to be fallacious in
terms of following proper premises. Each and every time Roger lies
about something, Allah exposes him. I knew he will rib about this too
and will again, shamelessly lie about not using circular reasoning,
but that's absolutely fine. If I to artistically depict the situation
here, Roger resembles a dog that has its spittle constantly dribbling,
he couldn't stop unless a massive pair of flip-flops is intemperately
thrown into his malodorous mouth. Carl will continue to endorse Roger
for obvious reasons, even he knew Roger is defeated. The latter will
continuingly claim to be victorious, even he knew he is miserably
lying. I' am amply confident with my unassailable temperament. Each
and everyone here knew what's the truth, even if he attempts to evade
its substantiation. These attempts are wholly futile. Lastly, if
someone here one day decided to grow up and be a brave man, and meet
me one to one on Skype, he is warmly welcome. I surely doubt that
someone will ever grow up though. But, just in case, my portal remains
open. I will continue to bombard each and every infidel here until
they flawlessly decease. We shall see then, who would laugh at the
end.
--
(Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is a
shoreless ocean.)
