Political Prisoners in Ukraine: A Crisis Ignored by Western Media
Friday, 01 July 2016 10:05 By Halyna Mokrushyna, Truthout | News Analysis
A Ukrainian Army soldier, left, stands guard as prisoners are exchanged
between the Donetsk People's Republic and the Ukrainian government on the
outskirts of Yasinovataya, Ukraine, September 28, 2014. (Mauricio Lima / The
New York Times)
An investigative delegation of the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention
of Torture suspended an official visit to Ukraine last month after the
Security Service of Ukraine denied the UN officials access to several parts
of the country. The suspension of the visit highlights the dire situation of
political prisoners in Ukraine.
The regions to which the delegation was denied access are areas where, as
Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture Chair Sir Malcolm Evans stated, "We
have heard numerous and serious allegations that people have been detained
and where torture or ill-treatment may have occurred."
These regions are located in the front line zones of Donetsk region,
controlled by Ukraine. The Security Service has detention facilities in
Kramatorsk, Mariupol and Artyomovsk, where it keeps Ukrainians with
"pro-Russian" views, according to Larisa Shesler, the head of the Union of
Political Emigrants and Political Prisoners of Ukraine.
Shesler is from Mykolaiv in southern Ukraine. At the beginning of 2014, she
participated in peaceful protests against the Euromaidan, which, in the
perception of protesters, threatened the dismantlement of the Ukrainian
state. In May 2014, the Security Service opened a criminal case against her
on accusations of "separatism," and she fled to Moscow.
By the end of 2014, Shesler and her comrades -- political exiles like
herself from Kherson, Odessa, Mykolaiv, Sumy, Lviv, Ternopil and other
cities -- organized the Union of Political Emigrants and Political Prisoners
of Ukraine. One of the main activities of the Union is human rights advocacy
for political prisoners in Ukraine, because the prisoners' existence is not
reported in Western media and not even reported well in Russia. The Union
maintains a database of political prisoners and helps prisoners to defend
their interests, in part by connecting them to people who can provide legal
aid or financial assistance to pay for lawyers and other court-related
costs.
Anton Herashchenko, a deputy of Ukrainian parliament and advisor to the
minister of interior of Ukraine, has stated that there are 4,000 open
criminal cases in Ukraine against people accused of "separatism." According
to Shesler, there are hundreds of people detained in Kharkiv and around
150-200 in Odessa, while many are imprisoned in territories bordering
Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics. They were arrested for organizing
referendums in May of 2014 in favor of decentralizing political power in
Ukraine, or they were taken randomly at road checkpoints.
In Kyiv, Odessa and Mykolaiv, ordinary citizens were arrested for expressing
publicly their political opinions. Larisa Shesler cites one example. In
2014, a group of people was arrested in Kryvyi Rih for distributing the
newspaper Novorossiya that was being printed officially in Odessa. They were
given five years in prison. The one woman among them was released
conditionally and is under house arrest, but the men are still in prison.
Shesler is in contact with the common-law wife of Evgeni Mefedov, a citizen
of Russia and taxi driver who is in detention in Odessa. He is accused of
taking part in the protest in Odessa on May 2, 2014, that was described by
authorities as a "pro-Russian riot."
On May 27, 2016, the Odessa court decided to release him under house arrest.
But "Right Sector" (Pravyi Sektor) extremists stormed the courtroom to
prevent his release, searching all the cars that were leaving the premises,
including police cars. According to Shesler, the judges in the case were
suitably frightened and pronounced a new indictment against Mefedov --
accusing him of threatening to kill one of the extremists who had disrupted
his planned release -- and he was again taken into custody.
Evgeni Mefedov is neither a politician nor an activist, Shesler said, and
his detention has caused him deep psychological distress. In December 2015,
he cut the veins of his arms trying to commit suicide while in detention.
Mefedov told Russian journalist Illia Filipov that the main reason for his
imprisonment was his possession of a Russian passport. Shesler concurred,
explaining that when Ukrainian authorities launched their investigation of
the May 2 massacre, they sought to present it as the work of Russian
provocateurs.
Since the beginning of pro-Russian rallies in South-Eastern Ukraine, central
TV stations and mass media, controlled by oligarchs who supported the
overthrow of President Yanukovych by Euromaidan, alleged that these mass
rallies were spurred by Russian agents. This was contrary to the obvious:
Large segments of the population in South-Eastern Ukraine did not approve of
the violent change of power in Kyiv, which started as a peaceful protest
against Yanukovych decision to postpone the signing of Ukraine's Association
with the European Union. This movement became known as "Euromaidan." It
became radicalized as right-wing nationalist paramilitary groups got
actively involved in the protests.
South-Eastern Ukraine has always been close to Russia culturally and
economically, so it did not accept Euromaidan. The nationalist government,
which came to power on anti-Russian rhetoric, attempted to recast genuine
anti-nationalist feelings of pro-Russian Ukrainians as provoked and paid for
by Russian "spies" and "terrorists." For instance, in the aftermath of a May
2 fire at the Trade Union Building in Odessa, in which 48 Odessa residents
died, one of the main news services in Ukraine, TSN, which belongs to the
supporter of Euromaidan oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, claimed that among dead
were 15 Russians. As it turned out, this was incorrect: No citizen of Russia
was found among the casualties.
Ukraine's Secret Prisons
The Union of Political Emigrants and Political Prisoners of Ukraine has been
presenting evidence on the existence of secret prisons to various
international bodies, such as the Organization for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OCSE).
Shesler and her colleagues contacted the International Red Cross, which has
offices in Ukraine, and gave them coordinates of the sites that they allege
are secret prisons. In February 2016, Shesler said the Red Cross requested
that the Security Service of Ukraine show it these places, but the Security
Service refused to do so.
Shesler argues that the Security Service of Ukraine's refusal to grant
access to these prisons is compelling evidence that the accusations of
secret prisons are true. In its latest report on the human rights situation
in Ukraine, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR) acknowledges the gross violations of human rights being
perpetrated by the government of Ukraine. Previous reports were mostly
focused on the alleged transgression of the DPR and LPR self-defense forces
("armed groups," to use the terminology of the OHCHR. The 14th report states
that the Security Service of Ukraine systematically uses torture,
ill-treatment and intimidation against critics of the Kyiv government.
The post-Euromaidan regime in Kyiv has come down hard on those who disagree
with it. Even those who supported the Euromaidan were not spared, like
Ukrainian journalist Ruslan Kotsaba. He is an outspoken opponent of the
so-called "anti-terrorist operation" unleashed by Kyiv against Donetsk and
Lugansk. Kotsaba was arrested in February 2015 by the Security Service of
Ukraine and accused of high treason. At a trial on May 12, 2016,
Ivano-Frankivsk city court acquitted him of this accusation, but found him
guilty of "obstructing operations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine." Kotsaba
was sentenced to three years and six months in prison.
Ruslan Kotsaba is one of the rare Western Ukrainians who publicly voiced
their opposition to this war. In Eastern Ukraine, opposition to civil war is
widespread, as were protests against Euromaidan, which is why arrests among
activists of the anti-Maidan movement number in the thousands. Here are two
examples.
Yuri Apukhtin
Yuri Apukhtin is a 67-year-old retired engineer with two university degrees
in economics and technical sciences. He was a deputy of the Kharkiv regional
council. In 2009, Apukhtin became the leader of a grassroots organization
called "Great Rus." In 2013, he initiated the integration of several dozens
of separate social associations under the umbrella of Kharkiv Civic Forum.
At the beginning of 2014, he became coordinator of the forum, which served
as the basis of the social movement "Yugo-Vostok" (translated as
"South-East").
Apukhtin has been active in the public sphere, publishing articles on the
internet, as well as participating in television debates on Kharkiv regional
channels and Russian channels. In 2011-2013, he coauthored a series of short
videos, "500 Seconds of Truth About Ukraine," which presents Ukrainians and
their history in a traditional Soviet-era interpretation as a brotherly
nation of Russia.
On April 30, 2014, Apukhtin was arrested in Kharkiv under accusations of
organizing mass unrest and illegal acts. The former deputy of the Verkhovna
Rada, Oleg Tsarov, who actively opposed Euromaidan and later had to flee
Ukraine, bailed Apukhtin out of jail. Apukhtin continued to participate in
peaceful protests and organize roundtables and forums, calling for the
cessation of fratricidal war in Ukraine.
On December 19, 2014, a district court in Kharkiv changed the restrictive
measures invoked earlier against Apuktin and rearrested him, this time with
no right to release on bail. He was charged with "public calls for a violent
change or overthrow of the constitutional order."
The prosecution has resorted to unusual measures in an effort to provide
reliable evidence of Apukhtin's guilt. One of Apukhtin's lawyers, Evgeni
Nadolia, told a journalist of Svobodnaia Pressa Andrei Dmitriev that
prosecutors have even used what is called in Ukraine "philological
expertise" -- when a language professional is called to analyze enunciations
of the accused. The chair of Russian language at the Karazin National
University of Kharkiv, who was called in to play this role, accused Apukhtin
of name-calling, demonizing the enemy and portraying authorities negatively,
all of which can be interpreted as an indirect "call to overthrow the
constitutional order."
During peaceful protest actions in Kharkiv, Apukhtin had, indeed, talked
about the status of the Russian language in Ukraine, as it is a thorny
question in Ukraine. One third of Ukrainian citizens consider Russian their
mother tongue. The Ukrainian Constitution recognizes only Ukrainian as an
official language of Ukraine. Yanukovych came to power thanks to the support
of South-Eastern Ukraine, to which he promised to make Russian the second
official language of Ukraine, but he betrayed his promise.
However in 2012, Russian and other minority languages were granted the
status of regional languages to be used in public administration,
educational institutions and cultural institutions in regions where a given
ethnic minority constitutes more than 10 percent of local population. The
new Euromaidan government, which came to power through a coup d'état as a
result of Euromaidan protests, tried to abolish the law on regional
languages. This sent a clear signal to South-Eastern Ukraine that the new
government is anti-Russian. The acting president of Ukraine, Turchynov,
revoked the abolition of the law, but it was too late. This move by Kyiv
government sparked protests all throughout South-East, and especially in
Donbass.
Apukhtin also talked about a necessity to organize referendums and to reform
the Constitution of Ukraine to allow for federalization and
decentralization. The Kharkiv Research Institute of Forensic Expertise
conducted its own linguistic analysis of Apukhtin's speeches. It found
nothing criminal in them.
The court continues to refuse the defense attorneys' motion to allow
Apukhtin to be released from jail under house arrest. He has been detained
in Kharkiv pre-trial prison since December 2014.
Elena Glishchinskaya
Elena Glishchinskaya-Romanova was editor-in-chief of a TV station in the
Odessa region. She was arrested in her house by the Security Service of
Ukraine on April 29, 2015. Members of the Security Service's "Alfa"
anti-terrorist squad broke into Glishchinskaya's apartment at 5:30 am in
search of agitation and propaganda material. According to Glishchinskaya's
post in Facebook, they woke up her two children at gunpoint while keeping
her at gunpoint the whole time.
According to Glishchinskaya, Alfa officers found in her apartment 20
leaflets, a 2010 calendar of the Party of Regions (the party of the
overthrown President Victor Yanukovych), manuals and books on journalism,
books on the history of the Odessa region and two computers. Based on this
"evidence," the Security Service of Ukraine opened a criminal case accusing
Glishchinskaya of being a threat to the territorial integrity of Ukraine. A
court sentenced her to two months of preventive detention, which was
prolonged several times.
Her case is part of the criminal investigation into the activities of the
People's Council of Bessarabia. The Security Service of Ukraine alleges that
Glishchinskaya colluded with representatives of the Russian Federation and
created this Council with the goal of separating southern districts of
Odessa region, known as Bessarabia, from Ukraine. According to the
indictment by Primorsk district court, the materials of the TV station where
Glishchinskaya has worked presented opinions on the national-cultural
uniqueness of Bessarabia, covered spontaneous protests of local residents
against military conscription and raised question of strengthening local
self-governance.
While in custody, Glishchinskaya became pregnant. Her physical condition was
endangered and she had to be hospitalized several times, but she was not
allowed to remain in hospital. She was brought back to prison immediately
after receiving treatment and kept in the medical unit of the pretrial
detention facility. Thanks to the intervention of the European Court on
Human Rights, aided by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union, she was
transferred to a maternity hospital where on April 27 she gave birth to a
baby boy. Then, on May 14, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko granted a
pardon to Glishshinskaya and another political prisoner in Odessa. On June
14, they were flown to Moscow on a special flight, and Glishchinskaya
traveled with her 2-month old baby.
The cases of Yuri Apukhtin and Elena Glishchinskaya demonstrate the ways in
which the current Ukrainian state is violating the human right to freedom of
opinion. Both of them were imprisoned because they dared to speak up, to
challenge the official nationalist ideology, which the post-Euromaidan
government has imposed on the country. They are both opinion leaders, which
is more dangerous than any weapon. People sitting in high offices in Kyiv
know that the other, pro-Russian Ukraine has not disappeared. It fell
silent, couched under the wave of arrests and intimidations, unleashed by
Kyiv. And it waits. If the wind changes, it will re-emerge, as strong as
before.
The government that came to power in Ukraine as a result of Euromaidan
claims to be democratic and inclusive, but the current reality is quite
different. Ukraine cannot hope to build a democracy if its state throws
people in jail for dissenting opinions. Democracies do not do that. They are
supposed to respect and embrace ideological differences.
Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.
HALYNA MOKRUSHYNA
Halyna Mokrushyna is currently enrolled in the Ph.D. program in sociology at
the University of Ottawa and a part-time professor. Her doctoral project
deals with the memory of Stalinist purges in Ukraine.
RELATED STORIES
Russia's Humanitarian "Invasion"
By Ray McGovern, Consortium News | News Analysis
Ukraine Independence Day Celebration in Toronto Includes Fundraising for War
and Fascism
By Roger Annis, SpeakOut | Report
Ukraine War: A Reverse Cuban Missile Crisis
By William R. Polk, Consortium News | Op-Ed
________________________________________
Show Comments
Hide Comments
<a href="http://truthout.disqus.com/?url=ref";>View the discussion
thread.</a>
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Political Prisoners in Ukraine: A Crisis Ignored by Western Media
Friday, 01 July 2016 10:05 By Halyna Mokrushyna, Truthout | News Analysis
font size Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink
reference not valid.Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink
reference not valid.
A Ukrainian Army soldier, left, stands guard as prisoners are
exchanged between the Donetsk People's Republic and the Ukrainian government
on the outskirts of Yasinovataya, Ukraine, September 28, 2014. (Mauricio
Lima / The New York Times)
An investigative delegation of the United Nations Subcommittee on
Prevention of Torture suspended an official visit to Ukraine last month
after the Security Service of Ukraine denied the UN officials access to
several parts of the country. The suspension of the visit highlights the
dire situation of political prisoners in Ukraine.
The regions to which the delegation was denied access are areas where, as
Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture Chair Sir Malcolm Evans stated, "We
have heard numerous and serious allegations that people have been detained
and where torture or ill-treatment may have occurred."
These regions are located in the front line zones of Donetsk region,
controlled by Ukraine. The Security Service has detention facilities in
Kramatorsk, Mariupol and Artyomovsk, where it keeps Ukrainians with
"pro-Russian" views, according to Larisa Shesler, the head of the Union of
Political Emigrants and Political Prisoners of Ukraine.
Shesler is from Mykolaiv in southern Ukraine. At the beginning of 2014, she
participated in peaceful protests against the Euromaidan, which, in the
perception of protesters, threatened the dismantlement of the Ukrainian
state. In May 2014, the Security Service opened a criminal case against her
on accusations of "separatism," and she fled to Moscow.
By the end of 2014, Shesler and her comrades -- political exiles like
herself from Kherson, Odessa, Mykolaiv, Sumy, Lviv, Ternopil and other
cities -- organized the Union of Political Emigrants and Political Prisoners
of Ukraine. One of the main activities of the Union is human rights advocacy
for political prisoners in Ukraine, because the prisoners' existence is not
reported in Western media and not even reported well in Russia. The Union
maintains a database of political prisoners and helps prisoners to defend
their interests, in part by connecting them to people who can provide legal
aid or financial assistance to pay for lawyers and other court-related
costs.
Anton Herashchenko, a deputy of Ukrainian parliament and advisor to the
minister of interior of Ukraine, has stated that there are 4,000 open
criminal cases in Ukraine against people accused of "separatism." According
to Shesler, there are hundreds of people detained in Kharkiv and around
150-200 in Odessa, while many are imprisoned in territories bordering
Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics. They were arrested for organizing
referendums in May of 2014 in favor of decentralizing political power in
Ukraine, or they were taken randomly at road checkpoints.
In Kyiv, Odessa and Mykolaiv, ordinary citizens were arrested for expressing
publicly their political opinions. Larisa Shesler cites one example. In
2014, a group of people was arrested in Kryvyi Rih for distributing the
newspaper Novorossiya that was being printed officially in Odessa. They were
given five years in prison. The one woman among them was released
conditionally and is under house arrest, but the men are still in prison.
Shesler is in contact with the common-law wife of Evgeni Mefedov, a citizen
of Russia and taxi driver who is in detention in Odessa. He is accused of
taking part in the protest in Odessa on May 2, 2014, that was described by
authorities as a "pro-Russian riot."
On May 27, 2016, the Odessa court decided to release him under house arrest.
But "Right Sector" (Pravyi Sektor) extremists stormed the courtroom to
prevent his release, searching all the cars that were leaving the premises,
including police cars. According to Shesler, the judges in the case were
suitably frightened and pronounced a new indictment against Mefedov --
accusing him of threatening to kill one of the extremists who had disrupted
his planned release -- and he was again taken into custody.
Evgeni Mefedov is neither a politician nor an activist, Shesler said, and
his detention has caused him deep psychological distress. In December 2015,
he cut the veins of his arms trying to commit suicide while in detention.
Mefedov told Russian journalist Illia Filipov that the main reason for his
imprisonment was his possession of a Russian passport. Shesler concurred,
explaining that when Ukrainian authorities launched their investigation of
the May 2 massacre, they sought to present it as the work of Russian
provocateurs.
Since the beginning of pro-Russian rallies in South-Eastern Ukraine, central
TV stations and mass media, controlled by oligarchs who supported the
overthrow of President Yanukovych by Euromaidan, alleged that these mass
rallies were spurred by Russian agents. This was contrary to the obvious:
Large segments of the population in South-Eastern Ukraine did not approve of
the violent change of power in Kyiv, which started as a peaceful protest
against Yanukovych decision to postpone the signing of Ukraine's Association
with the European Union. This movement became known as "Euromaidan." It
became radicalized as right-wing nationalist paramilitary groups got
actively involved in the protests.
South-Eastern Ukraine has always been close to Russia culturally and
economically, so it did not accept Euromaidan. The nationalist government,
which came to power on anti-Russian rhetoric, attempted to recast genuine
anti-nationalist feelings of pro-Russian Ukrainians as provoked and paid for
by Russian "spies" and "terrorists." For instance, in the aftermath of a May
2 fire at the Trade Union Building in Odessa, in which 48 Odessa residents
died, one of the main news services in Ukraine, TSN, which belongs to the
supporter of Euromaidan oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, claimed that among dead
were 15 Russians. As it turned out, this was incorrect: No citizen of Russia
was found among the casualties.
Ukraine's Secret Prisons
The Union of Political Emigrants and Political Prisoners of Ukraine has been
presenting evidence on the existence of secret prisons to various
international bodies, such as the Organization for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OCSE).
Shesler and her colleagues contacted the International Red Cross, which has
offices in Ukraine, and gave them coordinates of the sites that they allege
are secret prisons. In February 2016, Shesler said the Red Cross requested
that the Security Service of Ukraine show it these places, but the Security
Service refused to do so.
Shesler argues that the Security Service of Ukraine's refusal to grant
access to these prisons is compelling evidence that the accusations of
secret prisons are true. In its latest report on the human rights situation
in Ukraine, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR) acknowledges the gross violations of human rights being
perpetrated by the government of Ukraine. Previous reports were mostly
focused on the alleged transgression of the DPR and LPR self-defense forces
("armed groups," to use the terminology of the OHCHR. The 14th report states
that the Security Service of Ukraine systematically uses torture,
ill-treatment and intimidation against critics of the Kyiv government.
The post-Euromaidan regime in Kyiv has come down hard on those who disagree
with it. Even those who supported the Euromaidan were not spared, like
Ukrainian journalist Ruslan Kotsaba. He is an outspoken opponent of the
so-called "anti-terrorist operation" unleashed by Kyiv against Donetsk and
Lugansk. Kotsaba was arrested in February 2015 by the Security Service of
Ukraine and accused of high treason. At a trial on May 12, 2016,
Ivano-Frankivsk city court acquitted him of this accusation, but found him
guilty of "obstructing operations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine." Kotsaba
was sentenced to three years and six months in prison.
Ruslan Kotsaba is one of the rare Western Ukrainians who publicly voiced
their opposition to this war. In Eastern Ukraine, opposition to civil war is
widespread, as were protests against Euromaidan, which is why arrests among
activists of the anti-Maidan movement number in the thousands. Here are two
examples.
Yuri Apukhtin
Yuri Apukhtin is a 67-year-old retired engineer with two university degrees
in economics and technical sciences. He was a deputy of the Kharkiv regional
council. In 2009, Apukhtin became the leader of a grassroots organization
called "Great Rus." In 2013, he initiated the integration of several dozens
of separate social associations under the umbrella of Kharkiv Civic Forum.
At the beginning of 2014, he became coordinator of the forum, which served
as the basis of the social movement "Yugo-Vostok" (translated as
"South-East").
Apukhtin has been active in the public sphere, publishing articles on the
internet, as well as participating in television debates on Kharkiv regional
channels and Russian channels. In 2011-2013, he coauthored a series of short
videos, "500 Seconds of Truth About Ukraine," which presents Ukrainians and
their history in a traditional Soviet-era interpretation as a brotherly
nation of Russia.
On April 30, 2014, Apukhtin was arrested in Kharkiv under accusations of
organizing mass unrest and illegal acts. The former deputy of the Verkhovna
Rada, Oleg Tsarov, who actively opposed Euromaidan and later had to flee
Ukraine, bailed Apukhtin out of jail. Apukhtin continued to participate in
peaceful protests and organize roundtables and forums, calling for the
cessation of fratricidal war in Ukraine.
On December 19, 2014, a district court in Kharkiv changed the restrictive
measures invoked earlier against Apuktin and rearrested him, this time with
no right to release on bail. He was charged with "public calls for a violent
change or overthrow of the constitutional order."
The prosecution has resorted to unusual measures in an effort to provide
reliable evidence of Apukhtin's guilt. One of Apukhtin's lawyers, Evgeni
Nadolia, told a journalist of Svobodnaia Pressa Andrei Dmitriev that
prosecutors have even used what is called in Ukraine "philological
expertise" -- when a language professional is called to analyze enunciations
of the accused. The chair of Russian language at the Karazin National
University of Kharkiv, who was called in to play this role, accused Apukhtin
of name-calling, demonizing the enemy and portraying authorities negatively,
all of which can be interpreted as an indirect "call to overthrow the
constitutional order."
During peaceful protest actions in Kharkiv, Apukhtin had, indeed, talked
about the status of the Russian language in Ukraine, as it is a thorny
question in Ukraine. One third of Ukrainian citizens consider Russian their
mother tongue. The Ukrainian Constitution recognizes only Ukrainian as an
official language of Ukraine. Yanukovych came to power thanks to the support
of South-Eastern Ukraine, to which he promised to make Russian the second
official language of Ukraine, but he betrayed his promise.
However in 2012, Russian and other minority languages were granted the
status of regional languages to be used in public administration,
educational institutions and cultural institutions in regions where a given
ethnic minority constitutes more than 10 percent of local population. The
new Euromaidan government, which came to power through a coup d'état as a
result of Euromaidan protests, tried to abolish the law on regional
languages. This sent a clear signal to South-Eastern Ukraine that the new
government is anti-Russian. The acting president of Ukraine, Turchynov,
revoked the abolition of the law, but it was too late. This move by Kyiv
government sparked protests all throughout South-East, and especially in
Donbass.
Apukhtin also talked about a necessity to organize referendums and to reform
the Constitution of Ukraine to allow for federalization and
decentralization. The Kharkiv Research Institute of Forensic Expertise
conducted its own linguistic analysis of Apukhtin's speeches. It found
nothing criminal in them.
The court continues to refuse the defense attorneys' motion to allow
Apukhtin to be released from jail under house arrest. He has been detained
in Kharkiv pre-trial prison since December 2014.
Elena Glishchinskaya
Elena Glishchinskaya-Romanova was editor-in-chief of a TV station in the
Odessa region. She was arrested in her house by the Security Service of
Ukraine on April 29, 2015. Members of the Security Service's "Alfa"
anti-terrorist squad broke into Glishchinskaya's apartment at 5:30 am in
search of agitation and propaganda material. According to Glishchinskaya's
post in Facebook, they woke up her two children at gunpoint while keeping
her at gunpoint the whole time.
According to Glishchinskaya, Alfa officers found in her apartment 20
leaflets, a 2010 calendar of the Party of Regions (the party of the
overthrown President Victor Yanukovych), manuals and books on journalism,
books on the history of the Odessa region and two computers. Based on this
"evidence," the Security Service of Ukraine opened a criminal case accusing
Glishchinskaya of being a threat to the territorial integrity of Ukraine. A
court sentenced her to two months of preventive detention, which was
prolonged several times.
Her case is part of the criminal investigation into the activities of the
People's Council of Bessarabia. The Security Service of Ukraine alleges that
Glishchinskaya colluded with representatives of the Russian Federation and
created this Council with the goal of separating southern districts of
Odessa region, known as Bessarabia, from Ukraine. According to the
indictment by Primorsk district court, the materials of the TV station where
Glishchinskaya has worked presented opinions on the national-cultural
uniqueness of Bessarabia, covered spontaneous protests of local residents
against military conscription and raised question of strengthening local
self-governance.
While in custody, Glishchinskaya became pregnant. Her physical condition was
endangered and she had to be hospitalized several times, but she was not
allowed to remain in hospital. She was brought back to prison immediately
after receiving treatment and kept in the medical unit of the pretrial
detention facility. Thanks to the intervention of the European Court on
Human Rights, aided by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union, she was
transferred to a maternity hospital where on April 27 she gave birth to a
baby boy. Then, on May 14, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko granted a
pardon to Glishshinskaya and another political prisoner in Odessa. On June
14, they were flown to Moscow on a special flight, and Glishchinskaya
traveled with her 2-month old baby.
The cases of Yuri Apukhtin and Elena Glishchinskaya demonstrate the ways in
which the current Ukrainian state is violating the human right to freedom of
opinion. Both of them were imprisoned because they dared to speak up, to
challenge the official nationalist ideology, which the post-Euromaidan
government has imposed on the country. They are both opinion leaders, which
is more dangerous than any weapon. People sitting in high offices in Kyiv
know that the other, pro-Russian Ukraine has not disappeared. It fell
silent, couched under the wave of arrests and intimidations, unleashed by
Kyiv. And it waits. If the wind changes, it will re-emerge, as strong as
before.
The government that came to power in Ukraine as a result of Euromaidan
claims to be democratic and inclusive, but the current reality is quite
different. Ukraine cannot hope to build a democracy if its state throws
people in jail for dissenting opinions. Democracies do not do that. They are
supposed to respect and embrace ideological differences.
Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.
Halyna Mokrushyna
Halyna Mokrushyna is currently enrolled in the Ph.D. program in sociology at
the University of Ottawa and a part-time professor. Her doctoral project
deals with the memory of Stalinist purges in Ukraine.
Related Stories
Russia's Humanitarian "Invasion"
By Ray McGovern, Consortium News | News AnalysisUkraine Independence Day
Celebration in Toronto Includes Fundraising for War and Fascism
By Roger Annis, SpeakOut | ReportUkraine War: A Reverse Cuban Missile Crisis
By William R. Polk, Consortium News | Op-Ed
Show Comments
