Not a word about Israel... interesting.
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Miriam Vieni
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 9:55 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Obama's Nuclear Security Summit Neglects 98 Percent
of the World's Bomb-Ready Uranium
Emmons writes: "At President Obama's fourth and final nuclear security summit
taking place this week, world leaders are confronting the danger posed by
nuclear terrorism - specifically, by reducing the ways that terrorists could
get their hands on the uranium they would need to build a nuclear bomb."
President Barack Obama. (photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
Obama's Nuclear Security Summit Neglects 98 Percent of the World's Bomb-Ready
Uranium By Alex Emmons, The Intercept
02 April 16
At President Obama's fourth and final nuclear security summit taking place this
week, world leaders are confronting the danger posed by nuclear terrorism -
specifically, by reducing the ways that terrorists could get their hands on the
uranium they would need to build a nuclear bomb.
But critics have pointed out that the summits have only focused on highly
enriched uranium in civilian possession, which, according to the Department of
Energy, only accounts for 2 to 3 percent of the world's supply. That small
percentage is used mostly by academics for research and medical isotope
production.
The remaining 97 to 98 percent is held in military stockpiles, which the
security summits have largely ignored. Countries keep the safeguards on these
stockpiles secret, and military material falls outside the scope of
international security agreements.
One fact sheet from the 2014 summit acknowledges that military stockpiles
receive far less attention, and explains: "Nuclear materials in weapons are not
excluded from the [nuclear security summit] discussions as such, but the
emphasis is on nuclear materials in industry. . Military stocks are a sensitive
issue, and discussing them could be an obstacle to achieving results in dealing
with civil nuclear materials."
Bruce Blair, co-founder of the Global Zero campaign to eliminate nuclear
weapons, complains that "the summit virtually ignores the rest of the materials
and the ways they can cause a catastrophe."
Blair tells The Intercept that "terrorist capture and detonation of nuclear
materials under military control" is a real threat.
That's particularly the case because, ever since the end of the Cold War,
countries have increasingly neglected the security of their military
stockpiles. For instance, in 1994, German police recovered nearly 400 grams of
plutonium-uranium oxide, believed to be of military origin, from smugglers in
the Munich Airport. In 2012, three American activists, including an 82-year-old
nun, broke into the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and
were not arrested until half an hour later.
An even greater threat comes from military insiders, who can slip material to
terrorists. WikiLeaks cables have revealed concerns among top U.S. and U.K.
diplomats about jihadi sympathizers in the Pakistani military. One 2010 cable
from Anne Patterson, then-U.S. ambassador to Islamabad, said, "Our major
concern is not having an Islamic militant steal an entire weapon but rather the
chance someone working in government of Pakistan facilities could gradually
smuggle enough material out to eventually make a weapon."
Experts have proposed ways for countries to reduce their military stockpiles.
For instance, out of the 600 tons of highly enriched uranium in the U.S.
military stockpile, around 150 tons is set aside to fuel the Navy's
nuclear-powered ships. According to a 2016 report by the International Panel on
Fissile Materials, the U.S. could power its Navy using lower enriched uranium,
prompting other countries dependent on the U.S. for enriched uranium to follow
suit.
Kelsey Davenport, director of nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control
Association, called the insecure military stockpiles "the elephant in the room."
Last week's terror attacks in Brussels have heightened concerns about nuclear
terrorism.
Belgian investigators discovered in November that the Paris attackers had spied
on a senior Belgian nuclear official, prompting concerns that the attackers
were trying to obtain radioactive material.
Some commentators suspected the attackers were attempting to create a "dirty
bomb" - a combination of radioactive material and conventional explosives that
causes contamination, rather than massive destruction.
But a Harvard study released this month argued that if ISIS could obtain
fissile materials, it could construct an improvised nuclear device.
In a 2009 address in Prague, President Obama called the threat of nuclear
terrorism "the most immediate and extreme threat to global security."
Since the first nuclear security summit in 2010, world leaders have made modest
advances in nuclear security. Twenty participating countries have committed to
increased efforts to combat nuclear smuggling, and at least 14 countries have
eliminated their entire stockpiles of highly enriched uranium.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
President Barack Obama. (photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
https://theintercept.com/2016/04/01/obamas-nuclear-security-summit-overlooks
-98-percent-of-the-worlds-bomb-ready-uranium/https://theintercept.com/2016/0
4/01/obamas-nuclear-security-summit-overlooks-98-percent-of-the-worlds-bomb-
ready-uranium/
Obama's Nuclear Security Summit Neglects 98 Percent of the World's Bomb-Ready
Uranium By Alex Emmons, The Intercept
02 April 16
t President Obama's fourth and final nuclear security summit taking place this
week, world leaders are confronting the danger posed by nuclear terrorism -
specifically, by reducing the ways that terrorists could get their hands on the
uranium they would need to build a nuclear bomb.
But critics have pointed out that the summits have only focused on highly
enriched uranium in civilian possession, which, according to the Department of
Energy, only accounts for 2 to 3 percent of the world's supply. That small
percentage is used mostly by academics for research and medical isotope
production.
The remaining 97 to 98 percent is held in military stockpiles, which the
security summits have largely ignored. Countries keep the safeguards on these
stockpiles secret, and military material falls outside the scope of
international security agreements.
One fact sheet from the 2014 summit acknowledges that military stockpiles
receive far less attention, and explains: "Nuclear materials in weapons are not
excluded from the [nuclear security summit] discussions as such, but the
emphasis is on nuclear materials in industry. . Military stocks are a sensitive
issue, and discussing them could be an obstacle to achieving results in dealing
with civil nuclear materials."
Bruce Blair, co-founder of the Global Zero campaign to eliminate nuclear
weapons, complains that "the summit virtually ignores the rest of the materials
and the ways they can cause a catastrophe."
Blair tells The Intercept that "terrorist capture and detonation of nuclear
materials under military control" is a real threat.
That's particularly the case because, ever since the end of the Cold War,
countries have increasingly neglected the security of their military
stockpiles. For instance, in 1994, German police recovered nearly 400 grams of
plutonium-uranium oxide, believed to be of military origin, from smugglers in
the Munich Airport. In 2012, three American activists, including an 82-year-old
nun, broke into the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and
were not arrested until half an hour later.
An even greater threat comes from military insiders, who can slip material to
terrorists. WikiLeaks cables have revealed concerns among top U.S. and U.K.
diplomats about jihadi sympathizers in the Pakistani military. One 2010 cable
from Anne Patterson, then-U.S. ambassador to Islamabad, said, "Our major
concern is not having an Islamic militant steal an entire weapon but rather the
chance someone working in government of Pakistan facilities could gradually
smuggle enough material out to eventually make a weapon."
Experts have proposed ways for countries to reduce their military stockpiles.
For instance, out of the 600 tons of highly enriched uranium in the U.S.
military stockpile, around 150 tons is set aside to fuel the Navy's
nuclear-powered ships. According to a 2016 report by the International Panel on
Fissile Materials, the U.S. could power its Navy using lower enriched uranium,
prompting other countries dependent on the U.S. for enriched uranium to follow
suit.
Kelsey Davenport, director of nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control
Association, called the insecure military stockpiles "the elephant in the room."
Last week's terror attacks in Brussels have heightened concerns about nuclear
terrorism.
Belgian investigators discovered in November that the Paris attackers had spied
on a senior Belgian nuclear official, prompting concerns that the attackers
were trying to obtain radioactive material.
Some commentators suspected the attackers were attempting to create a "dirty
bomb" - a combination of radioactive material and conventional explosives that
causes contamination, rather than massive destruction.
But a Harvard study released this month argued that if ISIS could obtain
fissile materials, it could construct an improvised nuclear device.
In a 2009 address in Prague, President Obama called the threat of nuclear
terrorism "the most immediate and extreme threat to global security."
Since the first nuclear security summit in 2010, world leaders have made modest
advances in nuclear security. Twenty participating countries have committed to
increased efforts to combat nuclear smuggling, and at least 14 countries have
eliminated their entire stockpiles of highly enriched uranium.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
