Greenwald writes: "In December 2009 - just weeks after he was awarded the
Nobel Peace Prize - President Obama ordered a cruise missile strike on
al-Majala in southern Yemen. That strike 'killed 35 women and children.'
Among the munitions used in that strike were cluster bombs, including ones
designed to scatter 166 'bomblets.'"
Glenn Greenwald. (photo: PBS)
NYT Claims US Abides by Cluster Bomb Treaty: The Exact Opposite of Reality
By Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept
04 September 15
The New York Times today has a truly bizarre article regarding the U.S. and
cluster bombs. The advocacy group Cluster Munition Coalition just issued its
annual report finding that cluster bombs had been used in five countries
this year: Syria, Libya, Yemen, Ukraine and Sudan. This is what The Paper of
Record, in its report by Rick Gladstone, said this morning about the
international reaction to that report (emphasis added):
The use of these weapons was criticized by all 117 countries that have
joined the treaty, which took effect five years ago. Their use was also
criticized by a number of others, including the United States, that have not
yet joined the treaty but have abided by its provisions.
As Americans, we should feel proud that our government, though refusing to
sign the cluster ban treaty, has nonetheless "abided by its provisions" - if
not for the fact that this claim is totally false. The U.S. has long been
and remains one of the world's most aggressive suppliers of cluster
munitions, and has used those banned weapons itself in devastating ways.
In December 2009 - just weeks after he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize -
President Obama ordered a cruise missile strike on al-Majala in southern
Yemen. That strike "killed 35 women and children." Among the munitions used
in that strike were cluster bombs, including ones designed to scatter 166
"bomblets."
Although the U.S. at first refused to confirm responsibility, a Yemeni
journalist, Abdulelah Haider Shaye, visited the scene and found irrefutable
proof that it was done by the U.S., a finding subsequently confirmed by
Amnesty International as well as a cable released by WikiLeaks. As a result
of Shaye's reporting of U.S. responsibility, President Obama demanded that
the Yemeni journalist be imprisoned and the Yemeni puppet regime complied;
Amnesty's Philip Luther said at the time that "there are strong indications
that the charges against [Shaye] are trumped up and that he has been jailed
solely for daring to speak out about U.S. collaboration in a cluster
munitions attack which took place in Yemen." So not only did Obama use
cluster bombs against Yemeni civilians, but he then forced the imprisonment
for years of the Yemeni journalist who reported it.
Five years later, Yemen is again being pummeled by cluster bombs. Human
Rights Watch extensively documented last week that the "Saudi Arabia-led
coalition forces appear to have used cluster munition rockets in at least
seven attacks in Yemen's northwestern Hajja governorate, killing and
wounding dozens of civilians." You'll never guess where those cluster bombs
came from: "Based on examination of remnants, Human Rights Watch identified
the weapons used in all seven attacks as United States-made, ground-launched
M26 cluster munition rockets."
Human Rights Watch headline. (photo: The Intercept)
As Iona Craig reported for The Intercept this week from Yemen, "The American
government has also supplied intelligence, in-flight refueling of fighter
jets, and weapons [for the "Saudi-led" attack], including, according to
rights organizations, banned U.S. cluster munitions." Indeed, citing the
Human Rights Watch findings, the New York Times itself reported in May that
"the Saudi-led military coalition fighting a rebel group in Yemen has in the
past few weeks used cluster munitions supplied by the United States." The
same article noted:
Both Saudi and American military forces have deployed cluster munitions in
Yemen before the most recent conflict, according to human rights groups. In
2009, Saudi warplanes dropped cluster bombs during attacks on the Houthis in
Saada, their home province.
The same year, United States naval forces fired one or more cruise missiles
containing cluster munitions at a suspected Qaeda training camp in southern
Yemen.
Reporting from Yemen for Rolling Stone in May, Matthieu Aikins described the
ample evidence that U.S.-supplied cluster bombs are being used
indiscriminately against civilians. Last month, Mother Jones' Bryan Schatz
wrote an excellent summary of all the ways the U.S. has been central to the
horrific Saudi slaughter of Yemeni civilians, including the supplying of
cluster munitions.
The U.S. has long been supplying cluster bombs to the Saudis. In August
2013, Foreign Policy noted a Defense Department press release proudly
announcing that "the U.S. military [is] selling $640 million worth of
American-made cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia, despite the near-universal
revulsion at such weapons." As the headline of a superb May 2014 Vice
article succinctly put it: "U.S. Cluster Bombs Keep Killing Civilians in
Yemen"; the on-the-scene reporters, Ben Anderson and Peter Salisbury,
provided extensive video and first-hand witness evidence to prove the truth
of that statement.
The U.S. use and supply of cluster bombs is long and ugly. In 2006, Israel
used American-made cluster munitions to kill hundreds of civilians in
Lebanon; Hezbollah reportedly fired them into Northern Israel. The NYT's
Gladstone himself, in a 2014 article, actually noted the massive Israeli
usage, though omitted that the weapons came from the U.S.'s re-supplying of
the Israeli stockpile (emphasis added):
Israel's military was widely criticized at home and abroad for its heavy
cluster-bomb use in Lebanon, dropping around 1,800 of them, containing more
than 1.2 million bomblets, particularly in the final days of the 34-day
conflict with Hezbollah. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz quoted a commander of
the Israel Defense Forces as saying, "What we did was insane and monstrous,
we covered entire towns in cluster bombs."
In that article, designed to warn of the increasing usage of cluster bombs
in Syria, Gladstone cryptically noted that "only three other countries have
suffered cluster bomb casualties that exceed Syria's: Laos at 4,837, Vietnam
at 2,080, and Iraq at 2,989." Gladstone coyly doesn't say, but guess who
dropped most of those?
In 2011, The Daily Beast's Lionel Beehner was shocked by Hillary Clinton's
audacity in condemning Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi for using cluster
bombs. He noted that the U.S. is "one of the world's largest manufacturers
of cluster bombs"; is "one of the few states, along with Libya, not to sign
the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions"; that "American manufacturers love
cluster bombs"; and that just "last year, the U.S. Air Force reportedly
spent billions of dollars to purchase a batch of 4,600 cluster bombs from
Textron, a New England-based arms manufacturer that also supplies munitions
to Turkey, Oman and the United Arab Emirates."
In 2009 and 2010, the Obama administration promulgated guidelines ostensibly
to make their usage safer, including banning their sale starting in 2018
unless they have a dud rate of less than 1 percent (unexploded bombs pose
massive risk to civilians, particularly children). But as Schatz detailed in
a separate article in June, "Activists have reported finding more duds than
allowed under the one-percent failure rate rule." Ample evidence
demonstrates these failures. Moreover, as Schatz reports:
The recent HRW reports also call [Textron's] CBU-105's performance into
question. "What we're seeing in Yemen is that they're having trouble meeting
this one percent criteria," says [HRW's Steve] Goose. "We have a photo with
one of the canisters sitting on the ground with four skeets just sitting
there. They never deployed."
All of this makes the New York Times' cluster bomb exoneration of the U.S.
today nothing short of inexcusable. Under the treaty which The Paper of
Record today claimed the U.S. honors, "States Parties may not stockpile
cluster munitions, and must also destroy their existing stocks within eight
years of joining." The very first article of the Treaty states (emphasis
added):
Each State Party undertakes never under any circumstances to: (a) Use
cluster munitions; (b) Develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile,
retain or transfer to anyone, directly or indirectly, cluster munitions; (c)
Assist, encourage or induce anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a
State Party under this Convention.
The U.S. does not occasionally violate one of those provisions. It
continually violates all of them, systematically and as a matter of policy
doing exactly that which the treaty expressly bans. For the NYT to tell its
readers that the U.S. - one of the leading cluster bomb states on the planet
- is actually one of the countries that "have not yet joined the treaty but
have abided by its provisions" is nationalistic propaganda of the most
extreme kind.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Glenn Greenwald. (photo: PBS)
https://theintercept.com/2015/09/03/nyt-claims-u-s-abides-cluster-bomb-ban-e
xact-opposite-reality/https://theintercept.com/2015/09/03/nyt-claims-u-s-abi
des-cluster-bomb-ban-exact-opposite-reality/
NYT Claims US Abides by Cluster Bomb Treaty: The Exact Opposite of Reality
By Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept
04 September 15
he New York Times today has a truly bizarre article regarding the U.S. and
cluster bombs. The advocacy group Cluster Munition Coalition just issued its
annual report finding that cluster bombs had been used in five countries
this year: Syria, Libya, Yemen, Ukraine and Sudan. This is what The Paper of
Record, in its report by Rick Gladstone, said this morning about the
international reaction to that report (emphasis added):
The use of these weapons was criticized by all 117 countries that have
joined the treaty, which took effect five years ago. Their use was also
criticized by a number of others, including the United States, that have not
yet joined the treaty but have abided by its provisions.
As Americans, we should feel proud that our government, though refusing to
sign the cluster ban treaty, has nonetheless "abided by its provisions" - if
not for the fact that this claim is totally false. The U.S. has long been
and remains one of the world's most aggressive suppliers of cluster
munitions, and has used those banned weapons itself in devastating ways.
In December 2009 - just weeks after he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize -
President Obama ordered a cruise missile strike on al-Majala in southern
Yemen. That strike "killed 35 women and children." Among the munitions used
in that strike were cluster bombs, including ones designed to scatter 166
"bomblets."
Although the U.S. at first refused to confirm responsibility, a Yemeni
journalist, Abdulelah Haider Shaye, visited the scene and found irrefutable
proof that it was done by the U.S., a finding subsequently confirmed by
Amnesty International as well as a cable released by WikiLeaks. As a result
of Shaye's reporting of U.S. responsibility, President Obama demanded that
the Yemeni journalist be imprisoned and the Yemeni puppet regime complied;
Amnesty's Philip Luther said at the time that "there are strong indications
that the charges against [Shaye] are trumped up and that he has been jailed
solely for daring to speak out about U.S. collaboration in a cluster
munitions attack which took place in Yemen." So not only did Obama use
cluster bombs against Yemeni civilians, but he then forced the imprisonment
for years of the Yemeni journalist who reported it.
Five years later, Yemen is again being pummeled by cluster bombs. Human
Rights Watch extensively documented last week that the "Saudi Arabia-led
coalition forces appear to have used cluster munition rockets in at least
seven attacks in Yemen's northwestern Hajja governorate, killing and
wounding dozens of civilians." You'll never guess where those cluster bombs
came from: "Based on examination of remnants, Human Rights Watch identified
the weapons used in all seven attacks as United States-made, ground-launched
M26 cluster munition rockets."
Human Rights Watch headline. (photo: The Intercept)
As Iona Craig reported for The Intercept this week from Yemen, "The American
government has also supplied intelligence, in-flight refueling of fighter
jets, and weapons [for the "Saudi-led" attack], including, according to
rights organizations, banned U.S. cluster munitions." Indeed, citing the
Human Rights Watch findings, the New York Times itself reported in May that
"the Saudi-led military coalition fighting a rebel group in Yemen has in the
past few weeks used cluster munitions supplied by the United States." The
same article noted:
Both Saudi and American military forces have deployed cluster munitions in
Yemen before the most recent conflict, according to human rights groups. In
2009, Saudi warplanes dropped cluster bombs during attacks on the Houthis in
Saada, their home province.
The same year, United States naval forces fired one or more cruise missiles
containing cluster munitions at a suspected Qaeda training camp in southern
Yemen.
Reporting from Yemen for Rolling Stone in May, Matthieu Aikins described the
ample evidence that U.S.-supplied cluster bombs are being used
indiscriminately against civilians. Last month, Mother Jones' Bryan Schatz
wrote an excellent summary of all the ways the U.S. has been central to the
horrific Saudi slaughter of Yemeni civilians, including the supplying of
cluster munitions.
The U.S. has long been supplying cluster bombs to the Saudis. In August
2013, Foreign Policy noted a Defense Department press release proudly
announcing that "the U.S. military [is] selling $640 million worth of
American-made cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia, despite the near-universal
revulsion at such weapons." As the headline of a superb May 2014 Vice
article succinctly put it: "U.S. Cluster Bombs Keep Killing Civilians in
Yemen"; the on-the-scene reporters, Ben Anderson and Peter Salisbury,
provided extensive video and first-hand witness evidence to prove the truth
of that statement.
The U.S. use and supply of cluster bombs is long and ugly. In 2006, Israel
used American-made cluster munitions to kill hundreds of civilians in
Lebanon; Hezbollah reportedly fired them into Northern Israel. The NYT's
Gladstone himself, in a 2014 article, actually noted the massive Israeli
usage, though omitted that the weapons came from the U.S.'s re-supplying of
the Israeli stockpile (emphasis added):
Israel's military was widely criticized at home and abroad for its heavy
cluster-bomb use in Lebanon, dropping around 1,800 of them, containing more
than 1.2 million bomblets, particularly in the final days of the 34-day
conflict with Hezbollah. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz quoted a commander of
the Israel Defense Forces as saying, "What we did was insane and monstrous,
we covered entire towns in cluster bombs."
In that article, designed to warn of the increasing usage of cluster bombs
in Syria, Gladstone cryptically noted that "only three other countries have
suffered cluster bomb casualties that exceed Syria's: Laos at 4,837, Vietnam
at 2,080, and Iraq at 2,989." Gladstone coyly doesn't say, but guess who
dropped most of those?
In 2011, The Daily Beast's Lionel Beehner was shocked by Hillary Clinton's
audacity in condemning Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi for using cluster
bombs. He noted that the U.S. is "one of the world's largest manufacturers
of cluster bombs"; is "one of the few states, along with Libya, not to sign
the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions"; that "American manufacturers love
cluster bombs"; and that just "last year, the U.S. Air Force reportedly
spent billions of dollars to purchase a batch of 4,600 cluster bombs from
Textron, a New England-based arms manufacturer that also supplies munitions
to Turkey, Oman and the United Arab Emirates."
In 2009 and 2010, the Obama administration promulgated guidelines ostensibly
to make their usage safer, including banning their sale starting in 2018
unless they have a dud rate of less than 1 percent (unexploded bombs pose
massive risk to civilians, particularly children). But as Schatz detailed in
a separate article in June, "Activists have reported finding more duds than
allowed under the one-percent failure rate rule." Ample evidence
demonstrates these failures. Moreover, as Schatz reports:
The recent HRW reports also call [Textron's] CBU-105's performance into
question. "What we're seeing in Yemen is that they're having trouble meeting
this one percent criteria," says [HRW's Steve] Goose. "We have a photo with
one of the canisters sitting on the ground with four skeets just sitting
there. They never deployed."
All of this makes the New York Times' cluster bomb exoneration of the U.S.
today nothing short of inexcusable. Under the treaty which The Paper of
Record today claimed the U.S. honors, "States Parties may not stockpile
cluster munitions, and must also destroy their existing stocks within eight
years of joining." The very first article of the Treaty states (emphasis
added):
Each State Party undertakes never under any circumstances to: (a) Use
cluster munitions; (b) Develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile,
retain or transfer to anyone, directly or indirectly, cluster munitions; (c)
Assist, encourage or induce anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a
State Party under this Convention.
The U.S. does not occasionally violate one of those provisions. It
continually violates all of them, systematically and as a matter of policy
doing exactly that which the treaty expressly bans. For the NYT to tell its
readers that the U.S. - one of the leading cluster bomb states on the planet
- is actually one of the countries that "have not yet joined the treaty but
have abided by its provisions" is nationalistic propaganda of the most
extreme kind.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
