From Truthdig
N.Y. Times Focuses on Rights of Campus Conservatives, Slights Liberals
By Adam Johnson
College Republicans complained to The New York Times that Donald Trump's
nomination "prompted widespread mockery from their liberal classmates."
(Screen shot / New York Times)
Over the past 18 months, the New York Times has dedicated 21 columns and
articles to the subject of conservatives' free speech on campus, while only
three covered the silencing of college liberals or leftists. A review of
Times articles, columns, op-eds and reports shows a clear emphasis on
documenting and condemning perceived suppression of conservative voices at
American universities, while rarely mentioning harassment campaigns against
leftist professors and/or the criminalization of leftist causes such as the
pro-Palestinian BDS (Boycott Divestment Sanctions) movement.
The Times' articles since May 1, 2016, on the alleged suppression of
right-wing speech include:
1.A Confession of Liberal Intolerance (5/8/16)
2.The Liberal Blind Spot (5/28/16)
3.There Are Conservative Professors. Just Not in These States (7/3/16)
4.College Republicans, Once 'the Best Party on Campus,' Endure Taunts Over
Trump (9/24/17)
5.My Liberal University Cemented My Vote for Trump (11/10/16)
6.Divisions in My Dorm Room (11/28/16)
7.On Campus, Trump Fans Say They Need 'Safe Spaces' (12/8/16)
8.The Dangers of Echo Chambers on Campus (12/10/16)
9.The End of Identity Liberalism (11/20/16)
10.How Violence Undermined the Berkeley Protest (2/2/17)
11.The Dangerous Safety of College (3/11/17)
12.Advice for My Conservative Students (2/16/17)
13.The Isolation of College Libertarians (2/28/17)
14.Life and Combat for Republicans at Berkeley (5/8/17)
15.Leave Your Safe Spaces: The 2017 Commencement Address at Hampden-Sydney
College (5/15/17)
16.When the Left Turns on Its Own (6/1/17)
17.These Campus Inquisitions Must Stop (6/3/17)
18.A Political Conservative Goes to Berkeley (9/12/17)
19.Don't Shun Conservative Professors (9/15/17)
20.The Worst Time for the Left to Give Up on Free Speech (10/6/17)
21.The Misguided Student Crusade Against 'Fascism' (10/23/17)
The Times articles on the suppression of left speech:
1.Who's Really Placing Limits on Free Speech? (1/6/17)
2.The 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy of Right-Wing Media (8/24/17)
3.When Conservatives Suppress Campus Speech (10/17/17)
The hand-wringing over liberal intolerance was kicked off in earnest with a
double shot from columnist Nick Kristof, whose "Confession of Liberal
Intolerance" (5/8/16) and "The Liberal Blind Spot" (5/28/16) both lamented
the rising "intolerance" of liberals in academia. This piece was followed up
with a thematic carbon copy in December 2016 in the wake of Trump's surprise
victory. As FAIR (12/13/16) noted at the time, Kristof used his
considerable influence to argue for what was, in effect, affirmative action
for the far right.
Advertisement
Some articles, like "Berkeley Is Under Attack From Both Sides" (4/26/17),
lamented the free speech oppression of "both sides," but took no strong
position against either perceived threat.
Professors silenced or fired over anti-Israel activities, like Berkeley's
Paul Hadweh or SUNY Plattsburgh's Simona Sharoni, were not covered, much
less defended, in the Times during the study period. The broader trend of
anti-BDS activity threatening college free speech was almost never touched
upon, and when it was, it was given only a fraction of the pearl-clutching
reserved for the lack of far-right professors or the mean things said about
Trump supporters by undergrads.The New York Times did sporadically cover the
dozens of laws throughout the country seeking to criminalize BDS, but never
put it in the broader context of college free speech. (For example, musician
Roger Waters' "Congress Shouldn't Silence Human Rights
Advocates"-9/7/17-criticized laws that target "individuals and businesses
who actively participate in boycott campaigns in support of Palestinian
rights," not specifically student activists.) A piece defending BDS speech
rights by anti-BDS CUNY professor Eric Alterman did run in March 2016,
outside the timeframe of the study.
A similar phenomenon emerged during the primaries, when reporters would
parachute in to document the oppression of Hillary Clinton backers by Bernie
Sanders supporters on college campuses; both conceits were based on the
false notion that college campus should be 1-to-1 hospitable to all
ideologies and candidates at all times. The idea that certain
viewpoints-like supply-side economics, racial eugenics or a Eurocentric view
of history-are underrepresented on campus because they aren't intellectually
credible is never entertained.
On the dubious altar of "ideological diversity," the paper of record
sacrifices any sense of proportionality. With alt-right and neo-Nazi
elements on the march-and a White House that's at the very least sympathetic
to them-the Times focuses its tremendous influence, time and again, on
creating a space in academia for reactionary, racist and sexist views that
are wildly overrepresented in almost every other sector of society.
