[blind-democracy] ‘Militant’ fights prison censorship in Illinois

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:09:48 -0400

http://themilitant.com/2017/8114/811453.html
The Militant (logo)

Vol. 81/No. 14      April 10, 2017


‘Militant’ fights prison censorship in Illinois


BY JOHN HAWKINS
CHICAGO — The fight against censorship of the Militant at the Illinois River Correctional Center in Canton is winning support after prison authorities denied a long-term subscriber three issues of the socialist newsweekly last fall.
Officials at the 2,000-inmate prison wrote the Militant last December that they would review the censorship.

They claimed the three issues — each of which contains articles reporting on the Militant’s fight against censorship at the Attica Correctional Facility in New York — are “detrimental to security, good order, rehabilitation, or discipline or it might facilitate criminal activity or be detrimental to mental health.”

Since David Goldstein, the Militant’s attorney, filed a Feb. 16 letter urging an end to the censorship, nothing further has been heard from Illinois prison authorities. Goldstein is with the prominent New York civil liberties firm Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman.

“The Campaign to End the Death Penalty, CEDP, is an organization that has been in operation for 17 years and has provided services to over 5,000 inmates incarcerated within the Illinois Department of Corrections,” wrote Mark Clements in a statement supporting the Militant’s efforts to get the ban overturned. Clements spent more than two decades in prison in Illinois based on a false confession elicited through torture by Chicago cops.

“Based in Chicago, we published a quarterly newsletter, The Abolitionist, which carried stories like those in The Militant,” Clements wrote. “We believe that your facility’s Publication Officer acted out of bias when he refused to allow three issues of The Militant into the facility.”

“At no point in the history of the Illinois Department of Corrections that I can recall,” he said, “has violence nor rude behavior by inmates been the result of a publication.”

Prisons in Illinois — from Chicago to those run by the statewide Department of Corrections — are well known for their inhumane treatment of workers behind bars.

After the brutal repression of the Attica rebellion by prison guards, state troopers, local cops and the National Guard in 1971, prison authorities across the country began forming special tactical squads to be ready for use against protests, and to conduct mass “cell extractions,” searches and other special operations.

In 2015 a prisoner filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Department of Corrections and prison officials at the Illinois River Correctional Center, charging a special “Orange Crush” tactical squad conducted a brutal mass shakedown there. They berated hundreds of inmates, strip searched them, forced them to march in a degrading formation unit members called “nuts-to-butts” to the gym and held them shackled in torturous positions for hours while guards searched their cells, taking personal items, including legal papers.

The lawsuit charges similar attacks were carried out at three other Illinois prisons — Menard, Big Muddy and Lawrence.

“I am deeply troubled by your decision to deny incarcerated men at the Illinois River Correctional Center copies of the periodical entitled The Militant,” wrote Bruce Levine, J.G. Randall Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. “This act strikes at the heart of fundamental rights of U.S. citizens and at rights that should be enjoyed by all human beings.

“To attempt to silence The Militant’s voice represents a danger to anyone who cares about freedom of thought, inquiry and expression,” he said.

“I have taught in prisons and houses of detention during my long career, and I know how important access to materials of diverse viewpoints is to the rehabilitation of prisoners,” Levine wrote. “Censoring reading materials because they contain articles about censorship at other prisons seems to me particularly wrong-headed.”

“Although the articles do refer to national and local issues of concern to prisons, they do not promote rebellion of any kind,” Zoe Franklin, a professor at Olive-Harvey College in Chicago, wrote on behalf of the Chicago Council on Black Studies. “These articles simply share a unique world view on current and past events that are relevant to the lives of its newspaper’s vast readership.”

Censorship of “the Militant articles is a violation of prisoners’ rights to freedom of expression,” Franklin said, and “should be reversed.”

The Militant is still involved in a fight with New York state prison authorities over censorship of the original articles reporting on the anniversary of the Attica rebellion.

To send a statement of support or make a financial contribution to the Militant’s fight against censorship, contact themilitant@xxxxxxx or write the paper at 306 W. 37th Street, 13th floor, New York, NY 10018.


Front page (for this issue) | Home | Text-version home




Other related posts:

  • » [blind-democracy] ‘Militant’ fights prison censorship in Illinois - Roger Loran Bailey