https://socialistaction.org/2017/07/26/living-wage-under-attack/
Living wage under attack
Living wage under attack
/ 2 days ago
Progress Illinois: National Minimum Wage Day of Action
Progress Illinois: Chicago march during the National Minimum Wage Day of
Action
By WAYNE DELUCA
A recent study by the University of Washington announced that the second
phase of Seattle’s increase in the minimum wage, moving from $11 per
hour to $13 per hour, had the net effect of lowering the real wages of
low-wage workers by around $125 per week. This study was immediately
seized upon by the bourgeois press to show the folly of a living wage.
It also coincided with Missouri being the latest in a series of states
to use preemption laws to stop cities and counties from setting up their
own minimum wage above the state level.
The study, which focuses on workers making less than $19 an hour as
“low-wage,” is inherently flawed. It removes from consideration anyone
working at an enterprise with more than one location. This takes the
fast-food workers who have been at the forefront of the living wage
struggles out of the picture, and focuses on low-wage small business
employment.
Further, it compares Seattle’s economy with small cities in Washington
rather than cities with similar economic models, such as San Francisco.
And it incorrectly attributes a decline in low-wage jobs to losses from
the wage increases. In reality, the Seattle employment market has been
paying more, and the number of jobs paying over $19 per hour—the
threshold for “low-wage” work—has been increasing, as has their hours.
Seattle businesses and the bosses’ press has not let any of these
nuances stop them from using the study to beat down demands for a living
wage, wringing their hands over how the “left” (i.e., the Democratic
Party) is now “stuck” with the $15 wage idea even though they claim it
is bad policy. Of course, we should not forget that the Democrats had no
interest in the fight for $15 as a specific living wage target, and have
tried to push for lower targets that still do not give individuals the
income needed to live in a modern American city without government
assistance.
In a city like Seattle, where rents are rising out of control, even a
$15 ordinance is insufficient. The average rent on an apartment in King
County, Wash., has gone from $1066 in 2009 to $1617 in 2017. To keep
rental costs below 40% of income would require an average wage of over
$23 per hour. The city has led the nation in rental price increases in
the last several years. The modest increases in wages have not outpaced
the growing cost of housing, especially for workers outside of the
high-tech sector, which distorts the wage picture with relatively high
salaries.
The struggle for higher wages has had some gains in recent months. At
the end of June, Minneapolis passed a $15 ordinance—although it will be
implemented by phases that will take until 2022 in large businesses and
2024 in smaller ones. Most minimum wage laws have had similar multi-year
offsets in their plans, and none are indexed to inflation. Seattle will
not see $15 for every employee until 2021.
This is not a small matter. Minimum wage fights became a major issue in
2012. What cost $15 in that year is $16 in 2017, and will probably cost
over $18 by the time Minneapolis workers see the $15 wage—leaving them
$120 a week short of the targets that were used to calculate a $15/hour
living wage. Wage laws that do not adjust for inflation are obsolete
before they are fully implemented.
Unfortunately, there are also defeats. In May of this year, the Missouri
state government passed a preemption bill stopping towns and counties
from passing their own minimum wage laws. This forced wages in St.
Louis, which had a $10 minimum, down to the state minimum wage of $7.70.
This tactic originated in Iowa this past March, and will likely be
deployed more and more frequently as living wage ordinances pass in more
city councils.
Nationwide, job growth numbers have been strong, with a better than
expected 222,000 jobs added in June. But wage growth has been sluggish,
and the new jobs have not been offering substantially higher pay. Wages
rose 2.5%, but after inflation is calculated, this is a real increase of
only 1%. Despite the erosion of many retail outlets, the job growth has
generally been in the low-paying service sector, and not the blue-collar
manufacturing industries that President Trump has made the centerpiece
of his nationalist economic vision.
A large portion of the workforce also remains in what is called
“involuntary part-time work,” that is, workers who are forced into
part-time schedules but who would work full-time if the option were
available to them. About 5.3 million workers in the United States are in
this status, which became widespread during the recent recession.
Employers have not yet abandoned this tactic, which allows them to avoid
paying for health insurance and other benefits such as sick time and
vacation time.
Living wage battles are particularly important because low-wage jobs are
less and less frequently a transitional step. Two-thirds of workers who
made the minimum wage in 2013 were still making within 10% of the
minimum a year later; this number was about 50% in the 1990s. The number
of workers over 25 earning the minimum wage has increased significantly
in the same time period, changing the typical minimum-wage worker from a
teenager or college student to a working adult. However, social
attitudes have not changed to fit the new reality, and the stereotype
remains a teen flipping burgers for gas money.
Service industry jobs are increasingly precarious as the retail sector
shrinks and changes in what is widely called the “retail apocalypse.”
Consumer spending is down since the recession began in 2008, and while
the official profits rebounded in 2010, spending did not follow quickly.
With sluggish real wage growth and little confidence, the over-supplied
retail market has been forced to shrink because there is simply too much
real estate dedicated to stores. The net effect has helped restaurants
but devastated shops.
In cities that do try to raise the minimum wage, the specter of
automation has been held over workers. Campaigns have gone so far as to
show an ordering tablet computer and say that it is the replacement for
the minimum wage worker. The gains of automation in the service sector,
where labor costs are much smaller than supply and real estate costs,
are relatively small, and the strategy overall cannibalizes capitalism’s
ability to profit by removing workers from the pool of potential consumers.
The living-wage campaigns led by the Service Employees International
Union (SEIU)’s Fight for $15, and by Socialist Alternative’s $15 Now,
have made significant real gains for workers. The increased minimum wage
itself is an obvious benefit, but it has also brought fast-food workers
(SEIU’s main target audience) to national attention, and put a clear
class demand on the table as the major goal of a mass movement.
It should be no surprise that Democrats have tried many ways to kill
$15. The initial response by Obama and others, including sections of the
trade-union bureaucracy, was to take up a weak $10.10 national minimum
wage. This undercuts the idea of a living wage—that is, that any person
working full time should earn enough to support themselves. Increasingly
they have taken up supporting $15, but in highly staged ways, modeled on
Seattle, that would only rise to $15 in seven or eight years. The $15
number itself has become a symbol rather than the living wage idea that
it represents.
While we fully support the $15 struggles, socialists know that it is
merely a first step. Minimum wages must be indexed to cost of living
increases, at least annually, or the gains will be ground away by
inflation. And while the University of Washington study is deeply
flawed, wage demands should be raised side by side with a program to
employ any workers who lose their jobs as a result.
Ultimately, the minimum wage should be at least $20, with a “30 for 40”
policy that allows workers to work 30 hours for the same wages they
previously made in 40 as a road to full employment. And all workers
should have the right to form a union by card check without harassment—a
part of the “$15 and a union” demand that has been lost in the shuffle.
But the capitalist system will never offer a job at a living wage to
everyone who wants one. That would be against its own internal logic,
which requires an army of unemployed potential workers to keep pressure
on the workforce. The U.S. economy is carefully calibrated so that the
official unemployment number does not go below 4%—which would force
wages up sharply and lead to inflation. And the official unemployment
number is never more than a fraction of those underemployed or forced
out of the workforce entirely.
We need a new economy that is dedicated to fulfilling human needs, not
exploitation. The workers who are now engaged in the fight for a living
wage are one of the groups that need to unite—with union workers, with
unorganized workers, with women, people of color, immigrants, LGBTQIA+
people, and all oppressed people in the United States—to bring us there.
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
22Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)22
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
July 26, 2017 in Labor.
Related posts
$15/hour minimum wage drive ignited
$15 wage movement makes gains
Oregon rally demands $15 wage
Post navigation
← Philadelphia City Council pushes ‘diversity’ in the building trades
Get Involved!
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month July 2017 (14) June 2017 (16) May
2017 (17) April 2017 (14) March 2017 (13) February 2017 (19) January
2017 (13) December 2016 (12) November 2016 (19) October 2016 (12)
September 2016 (10) August 2016 (10) July 2016 (14) June 2016 (14)
May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (8)
January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015
(8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9)
May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11)
January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014
(9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10)
May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11)
January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013
(17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013
(15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013
(10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October
2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June
2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012
(19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October
2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June
2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February
2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1)
October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7)
June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February
2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5)
October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February
2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8)
October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008
(12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14)
February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007
(1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1)
February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006
(13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006
(7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5)
January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005
(13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005
(16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005
(19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October
2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May
2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15)
December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001
(19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August
2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000
(22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December
1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18)
August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April
1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July
1998 (12)
Search
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Upcoming Events
No upcoming events
Category Cloud
Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada
Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools
Elections Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights International
Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory & History
Middle East Palestine Police & FBI Prisons South Asia Uncategorized Vote
Socialist Action Women's Liberation
View Calendar
Blog at WordPress.com.
Follow
