[blind-democracy] Re: Fwd: [act-chat] Oops! National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC

  • From: "Charles Krugman" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "ckrugman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: <blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:06:03 -0700

You forget that Wal-Mart wants to promote reilgious and family values so they would be most likely be smart enough to follow and know the laws.
Chuck

-----Original Message----- From: Frank Ventura
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 9:57 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Fwd: [act-chat] Oops! National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC

I wonder what would happen if people refused to work on religious days for Walmart, somehow I dount the EEOC would have the guts to go after Wallyworld.

-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of abdulah aga
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 4:30 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Fwd: [act-chat] Oops! National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC


Hi
I don't know where this lead us?

When people start use religion to much as esquse for something then is not
good:

other word that esquse lead us in Couse or some type of mess,

I know how looks like and I past true all this things

So I would like ask smart NFB why they are didn't do sem thinks in my case with TX comition for the blind?
I would like ask smart NFB what would bee hempen if Muslim people say we don't work Fridays, because of are religion?


-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:11 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Fwd: [acb-chat] Oops! National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC

I guess the NFB is a bit narrow in their definition of discrimination? They recognize it only when it happens to blind people?

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Krugman (Redacted sender "ckrugman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:38 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Fwd: [acb-chat] Oops! National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC


and the stupidity award goes to the National Federation of the Blind! I wonder whether the NFB membership will be apprized of this.
Chuck

From: R. E. Driscoll Sr <mailto:llocsirdsr@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 9:39 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Fwd: [acb-chat] Oops! National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC


All:
This came in the morning mail. It had rather long "TO and COPY" sections which I have deleted... Further details may be found in the link.
R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.



















National Federation of the Blind Sued for Religious Discrimination by EEOC


Advocacy Group Terminated an Employee because He Would Not Work on the Sabbath, Federal Agency Charged

BALTIMORE - The National Federation of the Blind, the largest organization of blind and low-vision people in the United States, violated federal law when it refused to allow an employee to observe his Sabbath and instead terminated him because of his religion, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it announced today.

According to the lawsuit, Joseph R. Massey II is a practicing Hebrew Pentecostal, a Christian denomination, and abstains from working from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday based on his sincerely-held religious beliefs.
The National Federation of the Blind hired Massey for a bookkeeping position at its Baltimore office in November 2013. In January 2014, the Federation told Massey he had to work certain Saturdays. Massey explained he could not work Saturdays due to his religious faith and suggested alternatives such as working on Sundays or working late on week nights other than Fridays. EEOC charged that the Federation refused to provide any reasonable accommodation and instead fired Massey because he could not work Saturdays due to his religious beliefs.

Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion and requires employers to reasonably accommodate an employee's sincerely-held religious beliefs unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the employer. EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. The National Federation of the Blind, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-02484-GLR) in U.S.
District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

"Employees should not have to choose between their jobs and their religious convictions when a religious accommodation will not unduly burden others,"
said EEOC Philadelphia District Director Spencer H. Lewis, Jr.

EEOC Regional Attorney Debra M. Lawrence added, "Most religious accommodations are not unduly costly, such as allowing an employee to switch his schedule to observe his Sabbath. No employee should be forced to choose between earning a living and following the dictates of his faith."

EEOC's Philadelphia District Office has jurisdiction over Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia and parts of New Jersey and Ohio. Its legal staff also prosecutes discrimination cases arising from Washington, D.C. and parts of Virginia.

EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the agency is available at its website, www.eeoc.gov <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.eeoc.gov&d=BQMCaQ&c
=cBOA5YEoZuz9KdLvh38YxdrPtfJt83ckXekfBgq5xB0&r=CK8oOj7-JYZnTDmB5orNTVZXar6Nr
snGtGHfQ5m79Do&m=X-azbiIlLDe6yFm40VOo18BkP3dAM0rd0Ra4aH1VCUU&s=r8E7HDDW1tHlr
NnXx76co9RJpg0MAQYmFeuiHLDXiq8&e=> .


http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/national-federation-of-the-blind-sued-36517
/?utm_source=JD-Supra-eMail-Digests
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jdsupra.com_legalne
ws_national-2Dfederation-2Dof-2Dthe-2Dblind-2Dsued-2D36517_-3Futm-5Fsource-3
DJD-2DSupra-2DeMail-2DDigests&d=BQMCaQ&c=cBOA5YEoZuz9KdLvh38YxdrPtfJt83ckXek
fBgq5xB0&r=CK8oOj7-JYZnTDmB5orNTVZXar6NrsnGtGHfQ5m79Do&m=X-azbiIlLDe6yFm40VO
o18BkP3dAM0rd0Ra4aH1VCUU&s=2h2gkTHVm-iso4Gw9uPk127o2sQOVIxWkTz82tm4L2k&e=>




<http://mandrillapp.com/track/open.php?u=30489975&id=ec68daf2a10b47949ad494e
7b411a6fc>




________________________________

Avast logo <http://www.avast.com/> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>







Other related posts: