Freedom of speech is the right to express your independent opinions
and convictions in public without being restrained, threatened or
censored. Ordinarily, the United States is prejudiciously portrayed as
the paragon of free expression worldwide. I distinctly destine to pick
Americanism apart. Each and everyone in many regions across the globe
is entitled to opine his opinion freely. The United States did not
invent the right of free expression. It is not exclusive to American
Constitution or its amendments. Freedom of expression is openly
practiced therein as long as Islam is incessantly denigrated.
Nevertheless, if someone oppugned the holocaust or its chronicle's
authenticity, for instance, he is instantly subjected to counterfeit
allegations of antisemitism. This is my endeavour concern of American
double standard. When a Muslim Commits mass murder, he is
unhesitatingly labelled with perpetrating terror. However, if a white
supremacist committed mass murder with even higher rate of fatalities,
he is classified as a demented and atypical individual. I have no
idea, how to illustrate this plain contradiction? How could you be
fairish and oppressive simultaneously? I respect decent Americans. Be
that as it may, as to Americanism, how could you consistently be
guilty, jury and judge concurrently? Freedom of expression is the
major factor by which the United States is allegedly portrayed with
unprecedented prodigy. However, freedom of expression therein seems to
somewhat be infructuous. So for instance, as to America's longstanding
crisis of culpably perennial fatal mass shootings, the National Rifle
Association blocks any congressional bill which aims to relatively
rectify the pitiful situation. For them, the subject is just
unforfeitable. Thence, freedom of expression resembles emptied
rhetoric at some point. If your freedom of expression doesn't allow
you to enact freely, your words may equate some bunch of barking dogs.
Who cares if the dog barks at him? In other words, if the National
Rifle Association listens incautiously to periodical congressional
criticism of irrepressible munition across the nation, what is the
significance of their critique then? What is the point of
congressional authorities being critical of unrestricted gun mongers?
I urge you folks to ponder on my proposition. Yes, here in Egypt,
freedom of expression is perfectly missing. If someone spoke against
Sisi's regime or his coup based governance, he is emphatically
subjected to scathingly be detained, imprisoned and ruthlessly
excruciated. We recognise that and we fairly admit freedom of
expression total absence. This is quite unfortunate but factual. We
couldn't deny it or wrongly fend for the military based dictator.
However, we strenuously strive in the cause of favourably retaining
its prosperity. Liberal media may have spoke against Donald Trump and
his policies of implementing racial disparity in addition to farther
major catastrophes hitherto, they are not able to alter the way he
deliberately perpetrates cruelty. So for instance, as for the issue of
remanded children because their parents immigrated illicitly, why
haven't they been just expatriated along with their families? The
media brought the subject briefly and then, closed the file while the
prob hasn't yet been resolved. Principally, the conception of
unequivocally free speech in the United States is an enormous fib. Do
you know what is really free in the States? It is greed and corporal
establishment. This vividly reflects the dominance of patrician
landholders of the American South as of pastoral panel and other
chiselers. Who could have spoke out against Israel's brutality which
is relentlessly imposed on decently innocent civilians as of women and
children in the congressional arena? There is no one member in the
Congress who could have spoke in the favour of Palestinian refugee
crisis unless he aims to infinitely lose his seat. Is this what you
ironically call freedom? I believe it is crucial to sincerely
reconsider the American portraiture of free expression and measure
that according to actual information. Is American vision of free
expression sufficiently genuine? I won't answer this question for now.
I'll rather leave it at your hand, so you could have a chance to think
about it and come up with the proper answer. I destine to considerably
expand the discussion of this subject because it is of mutual
interest. I at least think so. Thank you for reading, Mustafa Almahdy.
Best wishes, it is always hope that gives meaning to life.
___________________
