I'm a bit shocked by this piece by Bill Blum.
Miriam
_____
From: BBlum6@xxxxxxx [mailto:BBlum6@xxxxxxx] ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 8:43 AM
To: bblum6@xxxxxxx
Subject: Warning! What follows is very politically incorrect.
Warning! What follows is very politically incorrect.
Is Nice the last straw for you? The last victims before you call it by its
proper name: radical Islamic terrorism? French Prime Minister Hollande was
quick to point out that it was a "terrorist attack", but not a radical
Islamic attack. Oh? When the perpetrator is a Muslim named Mohamed, as in
this case, and the victims are celebrating an iconic Western holiday, why
the reluctance to use the latter term? President Obama's preference is
"violent extremists".
The left is the worst when it comes to political correctness. Here is the
very progressive Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), criticizing the
New York Times for labeling the mass-murder truck attack in Nice "terrorist"
... "despite admitting that it had no knowledge of the presumed killer's
motives."
In a recent article I criticized President Obama for saying that ISIS
"has nothing to do with Islam". This, I stated, is standard political
correctness which ignores the indisputable role played by Islam in inspiring
Orlando and Long Beach and Paris and Ankara and other massacres; it is the
religion that teaches the beauty and godliness of jihad and the heavenly
rewards for suicide bombings.
I have received several letters of rebuke for these thoughts which mainly
argued two points:
You can't condemn an entire religion or other ideology for the actions
or the statements of a few "psychologically deranged individuals".
The West has behaved just as terroristic, but no Western religion has
been condemned at all in the same manner.
The Islamic teachings I refer to are not necessarily explicitly
mentioned in the Koran or any other sacred texts, nor have any connection to
actual historical events of the 7th through the 21st centuries, but rather
are an imbedded part of the atmosphere surrounding a young person growing up
in a Muslim culture or environment. This atmosphere, this education, this
culture must be severely curtailed. The West must oversee the classes in
Islamic schools in France, the UK, the US, et al; and particularly Pakistan
if feasible. Even if it means sending in spies to the classes, outfitted
with recording devices. The teachers of these classes, if they have had any
connection at all to anything smacking of radical Islam, should not be
hired; if already hired, should be fired.
The same should apply to imams and other officials of mosques.
We are sometimes told that the perpetrator of some horrible terrorist act
was not even religious or never attended a mosque. This appears to be
irrelevant if the person has been raised in the kind of atmosphere referred
to above.
If defenders of Islam really believe that the terrorists are just a tiny
group of "psychologically deranged individuals" they shouldn't object to
this purging of them. They should be as happy to be rid of them -- and the
ignominy and shame they bring upon Islam -- as the West would be to rid the
world of their influence.
As to the West having behaved just as horribly, just as terroristic,
without any Western religion having been condemned in the same manner ... I
do not need to be taught about terrible Western behavior. I've literally
written the book on the subject; five books to be exact. And I have called
for the imprisonment of numerous American mass murderers, torturers and war
criminals, from Harry Truman and Richard Nixon to George W. Bush and Barack
Obama.
Every culture of course indoctrinates its young and I would further ban
the teaching of the American state religion that inspires young men and
women to travel halfway round the world to torture and kill complete
strangers who have done them no harm; a religion known as "American
exceptionalism".
US and French foreign policy provide ample reasons for the hatred of their
governments, but as awful as these governments have been, they have not
sought to destroy modern civilization. They have not routinely, fiendishly
and joyfully engaged in beheading people, playing soccer with their heads,
hacking people to death with machetes, sternly banning alcohol, music, gays,
sex, covering up women's faces, destroying ancient monuments, forcibly
imposing religious law, and on and on including the worst of all: repeated
suicide bombings and suicide attacks such as in Nice.
The vast majority of radical Islamic terrorism's victims have been
civilians who had nothing to do with US or French foreign policy.
And last week at a high-school graduation in Germany an Islamic student
refused to shake the hand of a teacher handing out diplomas. Why? The
teacher was a woman. (The Independent, London, July 13, 2016)
It should be further kept in mind that, unlike the Islamic State, the
Western powers can be, and have on many occasions been, embarrassed; they
have some constituencies to cater to; ISIS is not a member of the United
Nations, human-rights groups or anything else, and doesn't run for office.
They behave like creatures from outer space and are convinced that God/Allah
is on their side. American leaders, such as George W. Bush, have stated the
same on occasion but they don't really act on this in any meaningful,
lasting manner, and wouldn't get away with it if they did.
Yes, I of course know all about Hiroshima and Indochina and Iraq. The fact
that no American leader has been punished for any of this does not reduce
the need to destroy ISIS.
It may come down to this: A video released by ISIS following recent
terrorist attacks in Bangladesh declared: "What you witnessed in Bangladesh
was a glimpse. This will repeat, repeat and repeat until you lose and we
win and the sharia is established throughout the world."(Washington Post,
July 8, 2016) In combatting such an obsessed and maniacal force, the West
can not afford to be held back by political correctness.
