Democratic Senator Schumer Is a Dishonest Putz on Korea, Peace
By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
15 June 18
Democrats' stupidly rigid, soulless partisanship is worse than Trump
Passive American war crimes, incessant firebombing of North Korean cities
full of civilians, helped bring about a formal ceasefire on July 27, 1953.
That armistice did not end the Korean War, which is not over yet. American
hostility to North Korea has continued unabated, overtly and covertly for
the past 45 years. The American position has never included good faith. The
US position has never embraced a rational view of complex realities. The US
has demanded surrender, in effect, as the precondition of any normalization.
The US has continued to wage economic, diplomatic, psychological, and other
forms of warfare relentlessly since 1953. And then the US was shocked -
shocked! - to find North Korea building a nuclear weapons deterrent.
The collectively delusional American foreign policy establishment has
bleated with one long, dishonest bipartisan whine about the sins of North
Korea without so much as an honest whimper about American war crimes or
later economic crimes that helped starve North Koreans. Well, the US
deceitfully said of the dead and dying, that famine was North Korea's fault,
they can't feed their own people. Funny how that's very like current US
policy in Yemen, where the US enables Saudi Arabia to wage a genocidal war
and at the same time ineffectively wrings its hands over the world's most
serious humanitarian crisis as if the US were helpless to make a difference.
Now we have the widely-derided President Trump actually contributing to a
new peace process nursed into being by the leaders of the two Koreas.
Instead of threatening nuclear war, the US is suddenly - at least for the
moment - threatening Trump hotels on North Korean beaches. How is this not a
better circumstance, no matter how preliminary and tentative? How is this
not a peace process that we should want to see reach fruition, if that's
possible? Given the uncertain, possibly fragile quality of current US-Korean
relations, one might expect any sensible person to take a wait-and-see
position on what is clearly a peace process only at the beginning of
negotiations that might lead to a settlement of the longest war in US
history.
Realistically, nothing has yet happened in Korea. And the cold war robots
are doing their best to make sure nothing does happen. But for the moment,
Trump has put forward reality-based ambitions. He has, in effect, observed
that the Empire has no clothes:
We have right now 32,000 [officially 28,500] soldiers in South Korea. And
I'd like to be able to bring them back home. But that's not part of the
equation right now..
We will be stopping the war games, which will save us a tremendous amount of
money, unless and until we see that the future negotiation is not going
along like it should. But we'll be saving a tremendous amount of money. Plus
I think it's very provocative.. And we call them war games, and I call them
war games, and they're tremendously expensive. The amount of money that we
spend on that is incredible.
This is all reasonable. It is all conditional. The surprise is that a US
president actually said any of it out loud. After 45 years of open hostility
to North Korea, the US has close to zero credibility in North Korea. That's
abidingly real. If there's to be any chance of a peaceful Korea emerging
from this peace process, the US must make more than a token effort to
establish its good faith. This is a start, but it's an easy start, with
almost no cost to the US strategically.
Given an opportunity to display statesmanship and patience, Democratic
leaders chose to play petty politics and display a foreign policy vision
wedded to militarism and bluster (which was one of the factors that cost
Hillary Clinton the presidency). Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New
York made the absurd claim that, by meeting with North Korea's Kim Jong Un,
Trump had given "a brutal and repressive dictatorship the international
legitimacy it has long craved." This is cant. This is the rhetoric of
decades of reflexive hostility, barren of insight and absent any recognition
that reality has shifted in the year since the South Korean election.
Schumer's prim, fake morality notwithstanding, the US does daily business
with just about every "brutal and repressive dictatorship" it can find, most
notably Saudi Arabia and its allies waging a criminal war on Yemen. The idea
that Trump meeting with Kim gives either government any greater
"international legitimacy" is a simpleton's fiction long winked at in
diplomacy. In the real world, legitimacy derives from behavior, and anyone
who looks can legitimately wonder whether North Korea currently treats its
citizens any worse than the US treats its Puerto Rican citizens.
Schumer's empty posturing went further than the traditional hypocrisy of
American exceptionalism, rooted in denial of American genocide and
enslavement. Schumer also felt the need to add nasty little lies to his
absurd performance:
President Trump agreed to freeze joint military exercises with South Korea.
And he called them 'provocations' - right out of the North Korean propaganda
playbook - without the knowledge of South Korea or our own military. I
guarantee you, our military men and women were squirming when President
Trump called our joint military exercises 'provocations.'
The president did not "freeze joint military exercises," as the Trump
statement above makes clear enough for even Schumer to see. Trump called
them "war games" and "provocations" because that's what they have always
been. Schumer may be right about US military "squirming" when they heard the
truth spoken aloud, but that squirming would most likely be because the
military has always known their war games were provocations. That's why the
US military wages war games year in and year out, in Europe and the South
China Sea and elsewhere, to see what they can provoke. That's the world
we've lived in for decades, and to pretend otherwise, as Schumer does, is
merely to perpetuate it.
Instead of thoughtless, kneejerk anti-Trumpery, serious leadership in an
opposition party would acknowledge the promise inherent in the Korean peace
process. It would also acknowledge that the process has just begun, that it
will take a long time to complete, and that calling names does nothing to
improve the prospect for success. Principled leadership in an opposition
party would offer good faith support for a process that moves the world away
from a nuclear confrontation. Or do Democrats not think of a denuclearized,
secure Korea as a success?
While Democratic Party "leaders" are playing a worn-out cold war script to
the cameras, they are also distracting from - and thereby complicit in - a
host of US crimes against humanity and crimes against the Constitution.
Democrats have long been limp on voting rights, the core of our democratic
system. Democrats have long been limp on dark money in politics. Democrats
have long been limp on immigration, perhaps never more so than now.
The Democracy NOW edition of June 14 covers the US perpetuation of crime and
suffering in agonizing detail which shocks the conscience even now. Human
rights attorney Jennifer Harbury sums up decades of US brutalism in this
hemisphere:
Sending any refugee back to a place of danger, it's a violation of
international law, which I'm sure President Trump doesn't care about at all.
But it's also a violation of U.S. law, and it has been for many years. We're
breaking the law. We're ignoring the cartels. And we're punishing the hell
out of the victims. How that makes us great, I couldn't tell you.
Why do the Chuck Schumers of the world think it's somehow better to rag on
Trump for an uncertain peace process rather than confront him on the
deliberate, continuous flouting of international and domestic law? Why do
the Chuck Schumers of the world tolerate the cruelty and violence inflicted
on poor people fleeing from violence and hopelessness? How do the Chuck
Schumers of the world fail to see that they are part of a government that is
behaving like a brutal dictatorship and now proposes to build concentration
camps for the children the government kidnaps from their parents?
This is more than just political cowardice, this is complicity in criminal
atrocities.
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
