[blind-democracy] Courts back two capitalist parties’ ballot monopoly

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
  • To: blind-democracy <blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:28:11 -0500

https://themilitant.com/2019/11/09/39793/


Courts back two capitalist parties??? ballot monopoly




??By Terry Evans

Vol. 83/No. 42

November 18, 2019


Confirming its role as a guardian of the capitalist rulers??? two-party system, the black-robed Supreme Court justices continue to refuse to hear any cases that involve opening up greater access to the ballot for third-party candidates. However, they do hear ??? and uphold ??? cases brought by either Democrats or Republicans to further restrict getting on the ballot.

On Oct. 7 it rejected hearing an appeal of a decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals that overturned a lower court decision lifting onerous petitioning requirements in special elections in Alabama.

Since 1992 the Supreme Court has cursorily rejected review of all 60 election law cases brought by parties other than the Democrats or Republicans.

Restricting the franchise for working people is a bipartisan effort. Republicans have promoted state laws that make it harder for people to register, or vote early, laws aimed at African Americans. Both parties have backed laws that push deadlines for filing by third parties back further and further. To field a slate of third-party candidates in the November 2020 campaign in California, you have to gather 65,000 valid signatures and have filed by Oct. 2, 2019!

Democrats are pushing measures that effectively throw opponent parties off the ballot. New York state will hear a proposal backed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the state???s Democrats that will jack up the number of votes a political party needs to get to retain a spot on the ballot for gubernatorial contests by five times ??? from 50,000 to 250,000. Their target is the Working Families Party ??? which always back Democrats, but sometimes promotes challengers against nominees inside the state party organization it considers not to be progressive enough.

And many workers are directly barred from voting. Thirty-two states impose restrictions on former felons right to vote, excluding millions of workers from the franchise.













Related Articles



???Break from bosses 2-party system, build a labor party???
The following is a Nov. 6 statement by Malcolm Jarrett, who ran as the Socialist Workers Party 2019 candidate for Pittsburgh City Council. The capitalist rulers use their two-party shell game to try and get working people caught up chasing???


In This Issue

Front Page Articles ???Asarco strike deserves support of all workers
???US-Chinese rulers??? rivalry grows despite new trade deal
??????Break from bosses 2-party system, build a labor party???
???New book ???The Turn to Industry??? boosts fall ???Militant,??? book drive
???Why working people shouldn???t join the liberals??? impeachment crusade
???California blackout, fire show need for workers control of power companies

Feature Articles ???Iraqi protests grow, demand halt to Tehran???s interference
???Socialist Workers Party 2020 campaign program

Also In This Issue ???As competition heats up, retail bosses tell workers, ???Speed up???
???DC meeting: ???US hands off Cuba and Venezuela???
???UK election: ???Workers need our own political party???
???Fight continues to keep last abortion clinic in Missouri
???Israel protest: ???Don???t deport Filipino classmates???
???Courts back two capitalist parties??? ballot monopoly
???After GM workers settle, workers at Ford debate, vote on new contract
???Fall Campaign to sell Militant subscriptions and books (week 4)
???Socialist Workers Party Fund Drive (week 4)





Books of the Month ??????Communism is not a doctrine, but a movement???





25, 50 and 75 years ago

Letters






?? Copyright 2019 The Militant?? -?? 306 W. 37th Street, 13th floor -?? New York, NY 10018?? -?? themilitant@xxxxxxx


Cookies

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Learn more.

Okay, thank

--

---
David Hume
??? In our reasonings concerning matter of fact, there are all imaginable 
degrees of assurance, from the highest certainty to the lowest species of moral 
evidence. A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence. ???
???  David Hume,


Other related posts:

  • » [blind-democracy] Courts back two capitalist parties’ ballot monopoly - Roger Loran Bailey