http://socialistaction.org/cops-dispense-racially-defined-justice/
Cops dispense racially defined “justice”
Published July 30, 2015. | By Socialist Action.
Aug. 2015 McKinney Texas
By JOE AUCIELLO
“In my career, my only training in the Constitution was how to get
around it,” (Sue Rahr, former sheriff, executive director of the
Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission, and member of
President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing).
Drivers on their way to work, zipping by one of the predominantly Black
neighborhoods in any major city, might not notice the presence of parked
police cars and aggressive cops questioning small groups of Black youth.
After all, scenes like this are an everyday occurrence, just part of the
landscape. It could be—and certainly is—Washington, D.C., Baltimore,
Cleveland, Los Angeles, etc.
If any passers-by do notice, they may not really understand what they
see. In fact, they are observing criminals at work, but not those who
always appear to be suspects. Stop and search, frisk and harass—these
are crimes routinely committed by the police. It is the improper use of
force, intimidation, and assertion of state authority predominantly
directed against Black people, usually young men. This is standard
procedure, what the police do to keep minority youth in their place.
That’s how the law works in this part of town. In a predominantly Black
neighborhood, there is no “presumption of innocence.” The police eye
sees suspects everywhere, so the police act on a presumption of guilt.
Throughout the nation, communities that are poor and Black typically
experience a distinct and special type of justice. Critics condemn
“racial profiling”; the cops praise “good police work.”
In a more well-to-do neighborhood, this kind of misconduct would be
correctly described as “illegal search and seizure”—the violation of a
person’s presumption of innocence. Since people of means have ready
access to the courts, this police offense is less likely to occur, and
any instance of it would more likely result in lawsuits and punishment
of the guilty cops.
In minority communities the police not only violate human rights with
impunity, they can also get the results they want without having to
break the law. Sometimes, for instance, they bend the law beyond
recognition in a practice known as a “pretextual stop.” This occurs when
police find a legitimate but minor excuse to stop someone—on the
sidewalk or in a car—and then use that pretext to escalate to a more
thorough but unwarranted investigation.
So, a busted rear light on a vehicle becomes an opportunity to search
for drugs, etc., typically resulting in questioning and arrests. Even
when, for lack of evidence, the person—the “suspect”—is released, the
police have committed an act of harassment. These practices are routine
in neighborhoods the cops have marked as “high crime areas.”
Racially-defined justice is also a highly profitable operation. These
stops and searches provide an opportunity to issue fines and collect
fees to support the city budget—literally, a racist tax. This was the
conclusion the Justice Department reached in its report on Ferguson,
where the residents were seen as “less as constituents to be protected
than as potential offenders and sources of revenue.”
The Justice Department report went on to note: “City and police
leadership [in Ferguson] pressure officers to write citations
independent of any public safety need, and rely on citation productivity
to fund the City budget.”
With or without pretexts, though, police ignore the civil and human
rights of minorities, especially the young, who are viewed as guilty by
their race and age. They are treated as probable criminals who have not
yet been caught. As a result, unwarranted police questioning can
typically escalate to frisking, searches of individuals and cars,
threats, arrests, and—as is now well known—even death.
The lead lawyer in a suit against the city of Ferguson, Alec
Karakatsanis, has said, “There’s clear case law that police can’t
illegally search you for no reason, but it happens 10,000 times a day”
(The New York Times, March 8, 2015).
One young man, a resident of Freddie Gray’s neighborhood in Baltimore,
gave this account of his encounters with police: “They trip you, choke
you out, cuss you out, disrespect you…” Further, “the police tell him
and his friends, while they are in their own neighborhood: ‘You’re not
welcome around here. Keep moving. Get the eff off this corner” (The New
York Times, May 3, 2015).
The protests in Baltimore have shown, by their ability to inspire
marches and demonstrations in localities all over America, that biased
and violent police abuse directed against Black people and other
minorities is not some local or rare occurrence. The criminal actions of
police against Black people, against young Black men in particular, are
not unique to Ferguson, Washington or any other city or town. Only a
powerful effort of self-deception can allow someone to believe that
police violence is merely the occasional mistake of some “bad apples” or
rogue officers.
But why does police brutality occur? Why do police, from departments all
across the United States, continue to harass and even shoot Black
people, including those who are unarmed? Shouldn’t the cops realize by
now that their actions are likely to be recorded by any eyewitness with
a cell phone and splashed all over the media? To commit these offenses
in public would appear to defy logic and common sense. What is the
explanation?
Conservative and even some liberal commentators are quick to point out
the dangers inherent in police work, asserting that police violence is
actually self-defense carried too far. This argument holds that cops
only seem trigger-happy. As they make split-second decisions in
potentially life-threatening circumstances, they are really acting on
the instinct for self-preservation.
This familiar answer is a rationalization that fails to account for the
racial difference in deaths at the hands of police. It’s as if killing
Blacks at several times the rate of whites somehow “just happens” or is
the acceptable cost of “public safety.”
Of course, even an excuse is not completely false. After all, any number
of people armed with knives and guns actually do attack police. Yet,
statistics consistently show that most on-duty fatalities result from
traffic accidents.
In truth, the terrible pattern of cop violence is a sum of symptoms and
underlying causes, all flowing from the social function of the police to
protect a social system based on inequality and oppression.
Most efforts of social reformers are aimed only at the symptoms of
police violence. These efforts include a reduction of the militarization
of local law enforcement, changes in tactical training, increasing the
use of cameras, and enlarging the authority of civilian review boards, etc.
Taken together, these reforms can be helpful in trimming the worst
excesses of the police, but new methods alone cannot solve the old
problems of brutality and racism. Reforms don’t address the underlying
causes that allow police to act above the law. Even with better formal
procedures in place, a young Black man fleeing the cops will likely be
beaten if captured (what cops call a “foot tax”), perhaps maimed, or
even shot and too often killed.
0Before Baltimore police subjected Freddie Gray to the “rough ride” that
killed him, that department had undergone decades of reform. For
instance, a lawsuit from the 1980s spurred integration efforts favoring
minorities and women. Nonetheless, according to the chairman of a group
representing Baltimore’s Black officers, “This department is a very
racist police department. The issues that you see manifesting themselves
on the outside are the same problems we have been dealing with on the
inside for years,” (The New York Times, May 10, 2015).
There is good reason to be skeptical of what can be accomplished by
reform. Consider, first of all, that police are typically accountable
only to themselves or to prosecutors and courts that work with and
support them. Since most police violence takes place with no eye
witnesses present, and therefore no publicity, the legal system
typically accepts the accounts of the police instead of the victims.
(The familiar videos that have been aired on television and the internet
create a misleading impression by suggesting that many of these
incidents are recorded. Not so. Police violence usually occurs when only
the police and their victims are witnesses. The fact is not lost on even
the newest patrolman).
So, police expect to get away with their crimes, and they have every
reason for that assurance. For instance, Florida’s Broward County, the
largest in the state, has seen 168 deaths from police shootings since
1980, with no charges ever filed against any officer. Is it coincidence,
then, that in the last 15 years the number of deaths in the county from
police shootings has tripled?
The freedom-to-fire granted to cops in Broward County is not
exceptional. According to a lengthy investigation published on May 31 in
The Washington Post, “So far, just three of the 385 fatal shootings [in
2015] have resulted in an officer being charged with a crime—less than
one percent.” In these three cases where charges were filed, and only in
these cases, “videos emerged showing the officers shooting a suspect
during or after a foot chase.”
Further, and more importantly, The Post reports that “of thousands of
fatal police shootings over the past decade, only 54 had produced
criminal charges.” In the other cases, internal department
investigations or state prosecutors found that police officers were
justified when they killed.
Of course, it should be recalled that the initial police inquiry into
the death of Eric Garner in New York contained no mention of a
chokehold. Without video evidence, police use of deadly force would have
been considered legitimate and necessary.
Recently in Cleveland a white police officer who, from the hood of a
car, had fired 49 shots into the front windshield, was acquitted of
manslaughter following the deaths of the car’s occupants, two unarmed
Black men. Since 13 officers fired 137 rounds at the car, it could not
be determined that the officer on trial had fired the fatal bullets.
Further, the defense lawyers argued that this policeman was in fear for
his life, the circumstance that legally allows the police to use deadly
force.
The harsh, brutal, and sometimes fatal measures of the police flow
directly from their social function. The role of the police and the
courts is to protect a national state founded on class division,
permanent inequality, and racial discrimination. Their role in
protecting the state gives them a special status and the belief that
“the police are above the law.” They are the billy club of the state.
In this sacred duty local police are joined by the National Guard and
other branches of the military, by federal police agencies, and the
security apparatus that taps the phones, stores the e-mails, and spies
on American citizens.
The police are no more neutral or fair-minded than the government they
ultimately serve or the laws they enforce. As attorney William M.
Kunstler has observed, the law “is, in fundamental essence, nothing more
than a method of control created by a socioeconomic system determined,
at all costs, to perpetuate itself, by all and any means necessary, for
as long as possible” (“The Emerging Police State,” Ocean Press, pp. 38-39).
Kunstler goes on to say that in the United States, “We steadfastly deny,
or refuse to acknowledge, that the criminal justice system, insofar as
blacks and other minority members are concerned, is merely a device to
keep them at bay” (p. 41). What Kunstler wrote two decades ago is no
less true today. It only remains to be added: To change the behavior of
the police, change the nature of their role in society. Change the
nature of the state.
Meanwhile, police violence against Black people will continue. A people
excluded from the mainstream of society can only be held in check by
force, including prison. Here is yet another sign, if any more are
needed, that America’s “post-racial” society has yet to fully
acknowledge the crime that is racial injustice.
Photo: A cop in McKinney, Texas, forces a teenage Black woman to the
ground during raid at a swimming pool in June.
Share this:
Facebook6
Twitter1
Google
Tumblr
Posted in Black Liberation, Civil Liberties, National Oppression, Police
& FBI. | Tagged Black Lives Matter, cops, police, stop and frisk.
Get Involved
Join Socialist Action
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Events
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
JAN. 2014 p.1 jpegJAN. 2014 p. 12
Subscribe Today
Subscriptions to the monthly print edition of Socialist Action are
available for the following rates:
- 12 month subscription for $20
- 24 month subscription for $37
- 6 month subscription for $10
Learn More
Email Updates
Enter your email address to subscribe to our free e-mail Socialist
Action Newsletter. Also to receive notifcations of new web posts by email.
Learn More
Newspaper Archives
Select Month July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015
(12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December
2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6)
August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April
2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11)
December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September
2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013
(14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013
(17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September
2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012
(19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012
(17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September
2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011
(19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011
(15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September
2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9)
April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9)
December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009
(3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April
2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10)
December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September
2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008
(2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008
(11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1)
April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11)
November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006
(11) July 2006 (12) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March
2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9)
November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005
(9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12)
March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004
(14) November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August
2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002
(15) January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September
2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September
2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000
(21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000
(20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September
1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999
(27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999
(24) July 1998 (12) 0 (2)
Learn More
Pamphlets/Books
Socialist Action publishes a wide variety of pamphlets on burning issues
of today such as global warming, women’s liberation, the Middle East and
other subjects.
Learn More
Socialist Action (U.S.): socialistaction@xxxxxxx | (510) 268-9429
Socialist Action / Ligue pour l’Action socialiste (Canada):
barryaw@xxxxxxxxxx
Copyright © 2015 Socialist Action. All Rights Reserved. Site Design by
Lucid Digital Designs | Site Utilities
