https://socialistaction.org/2016/04/27/connecticut-march-protests-austerity-budget/
Connecticut march protests austerity budget
/ 2 days ago
April 2016 HartfordBy CHRISTINE MARIE
— HARTFORD — On April 4, nearly 1000 union workers, community
organizations, Fight for Fifteen activists, and allies organized as the
Democracy, Unity and Equality Coalition marched on the Connecticut state
legislature to protest two austerity budgets in front of the
representatives.
The first, overwhelmingly approved a few days earlier by a bipartisan
coalition with 127 yeas to 16 nays in the House and designed to close
the deficit in 2016 state revenue by $220 million, hits the most
underserved residents in the state.
The few lawmakers who held out cited the unacceptable cuts to the
Department of Women and Children and services to the disabled. The
second budget plan, the FY 2017 budget proposed by a darling of the
national Democratic Party and the chairman of the Democratic Governors
Council, Dannel P. Malloy, proposes over $900 million in cuts and zero
increase in taxes on the rich.
At the first of two rallies, Jan Hochdadel, president of the AFT
Connecticut, echoed the mantra of the Chicago Teachers Union when she
mocked the claim that the state was broke and the budget process broken.
“It’s not broke unless they broke it on purpose,” she countered.
Connecticut has the fourth highest median income of any state in
country, but the figure is deceptive because it also boasts the highest
wealth gap between the 1% and the 99% of state in the nation.
Connecticut’s top 1 percent each earned an average of $2.7 million, and
between 2009 and 2012 their income grew 35%. The income of the bottom
99%, on the other hand, dropped 5.4%.
These figures hide the darker economic reality in the state’s urban
centers, such as Hartford, where official unemployment for African
Americans is the highest in the nation.
The refusal of the Democratic and Republican legislators to tax the
state’s 1%, as well as some of the most profitable corporations in the
country to preserve social services, was pointed out by speaker after
speaker.
Brian Becker, a student activist and AAUP supporter from Central
Connecticut State University, told the rally-goers, “Governor Malloy had
no difficulty giving the war profiteers United Technologies $400 million
in tax relief, and their CEO was given a salary of more than $10 million
last year. What is there to be said if legislators are not willing to
invest in our future, but are willing to protect the privileged few from
paying their fair share in the state in which they make their profits?”
The future they envision is clear from the list of proposed cuts. They
include reducing monies to orthodontic care to clients under 21, cutting
the amount given to those who cannot afford a burial or cremation from
$1400 to $1000, significantly dropping the amount given to a children’s
hospital highly dependent on Medicaid, dramatically cutting aid to
dementia care givers and mammogram support, gutting fire training and
environmental initiatives, impoverishing school-based health centers and
mental health/substance abuse treatment programs, cuts to asthma
treatment and group homes, and so on.
In addition, because the state worker unions bargaining agent (SEBAC)
has hesitated to open up the pension and health-care portions of a
contract not set to expire until 2022, the governor is threatening up to
5000 layoffs.
“Business demands this,” the governor told reporters, alluding to the
repeated demands by the Connecticut Business and Industry Association’s
20×17 plan to “rebalance” Connecticut’s finances and boost the state’s
bond rating. In short, business is demanding that the investments of the
wealthy in Connecticut bonds be protected by depriving the state’s
poorest residents of subsistence services.
The April 4 union rally, which the press characterized as the largest
and loudest in many years, raised hopes that the 15 unions that
represent state workers will indeed resist the cuts and use the struggle
to deepen a coalition of labor and community groups that could mount a
real fightback. In 2011, under similar pressure of huge layoffs, the
State Employees Bargaining Council, agreed to serious concessions in
return for the 2012 contract expiration that the governor and
legislature are now trying to reopen.
Because a majority of the SEBAC union rank and file in 2011 refused to
agree to the concessions package on the first round, SEBAC illegally
changed its bylaws midstream so that affirmation from only eight of the
15 state worker unions were needed to ratify the take-back agreement.
Rank-and-file activists who opposed the concessions were told by their
union leaders that to defy the Democratic governor would be to put steam
in the Koch brothers’ political engine.
The current round of attacks is putting that kind of strategic thinking
to the test. Connecticut unionists and community groups may find the
confidence to try a more effective response.
Photo: Peter Casolino / Hartford Courant
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
April 27, 2016 in Connecticut, Economy, Labor.
Related posts
Budget Crisis in New York
Tuition battle in Connecticut
Mexican Socialists Show Gains at Convention
Post navigation
← Primero de Mayo: día de lucha
Search
Get Involved
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month April 2016 (11) March 2016 (14)
February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11) November 2015
(9) October 2015 (8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015
(13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9)
February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November
2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July
2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014
(9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November
2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July
2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013
(12) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November
2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July
2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012
(17) February 2012 (19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November
2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July
2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011
(15) February 2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November
2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July
2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8)
February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009
(5) October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009
(5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16)
February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008
(8) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008
(12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14)
February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007
(1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1)
February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006
(13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006
(7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5)
January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005
(13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005
(16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005
(19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October
2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May
2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15)
December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001
(19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August 2000
(19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22)
March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December 1999
(20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18) August
1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999
(25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998
(12)
Blog at WordPress.com. The Expound Theme.
