When I was a child in grade school, we learned that those evil
Communists over there in the Soviet Union brain washed their citizens.
When I read the following, I wondered how much of what we Americans
are "taught" comes under the same heading. After reading this
account, we might ask ourselves whether what we were taught was
history or myth.
Carl Jarvis
On 8/29/16, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Schwarz writes: "Almost no one seems to be aware that even if the U.S. were
a perfect country today, it would be bizarre to expect African-American
players to stand for 'The Star-Spangled Banner.' Why? Because it literally
celebrates the murder of African-Americans."
Colin Kaepernick. (photo: Peter Joneleit/Cal Sport Media/AP Images)
Colin Kaepernick Is Righter Than You Know: The National Anthem Is a
Celebration of Slavery
By Jon Schwarz, The Intercept
29 August 16
Before a preseason game on Friday, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin
Kaepernick refused to stand for the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner."
When he explained why, he only spoke about the present: "I am not going to
stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people
and people of color. . There are bodies in the street and people getting
paid leave and getting away with murder."
Twitter then went predictably nuts, with at least one 49ers fan burning
Kaepernick's jersey.
Almost no one seems to be aware that even if the U.S. were a perfect
country
today, it would be bizarre to expect African-American players to stand for
"The Star-Spangled Banner." Why? Because it literally celebrates the murder
of African-Americans.
Few people know this because we only ever sing the first verse. But read
the
end of the third verse and you'll see why "The Star-Spangled Banner" is not
just a musical atrocity, it's an intellectual and moral one, too:
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
"The Star-Spangled Banner," Americans hazily remember, was written by
Francis Scott Key about the Battle of Fort McHenry in Baltimore during the
War of 1812. But we don't ever talk about how the War of 1812 was a war of
aggression that began with an attempt by the U.S. to grab Canada from the
British Empire.
However, we'd wildly overestimated the strength of the U.S. military. By
the
time of the Battle of Fort McHenry in 1814, the British had counterattacked
and overrun Washington, D.C., setting fire to the White House.
And one of the key tactics behind the British military's success was its
active recruitment of American slaves. As a detailed 2014 article in
Harper's explains, the orders given to the Royal Navy's Admiral Sir George
Cockburn read:
Let the landings you make be more for the protection of the desertion of
the
Black Population than with a view to any other advantage. . The great point
to be attained is the cordial Support of the Black population. With them
properly armed & backed with 20,000 British Troops, Mr. Madison will be
hurled from his throne.
Whole families found their way to the ships of the British, who accepted
everyone and pledged no one would be given back to their "owners." Adult
men
were trained to create a regiment called the Colonial Marines, who
participated in many of the most important battles, including the August
1814 raid on Washington.
Then on the night of September 13, 1814, the British bombarded Fort
McHenry.
Key, seeing the fort's flag the next morning, was inspired to write the
lyrics for "The Star-Spangled Banner."
So when Key penned "No refuge could save the hireling and slave / From the
terror of flight or the gloom of the grave," he was taking great
satisfaction in the death of slaves who'd freed themselves. His perspective
may have been affected by the fact he owned several slaves himself.
With that in mind, think again about the next two lines: "And the
star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave / O'er the land of the free and
the home of the brave."
The reality is that there were human beings fighting for freedom with
incredible bravery during the War of 1812. However, "The Star-Spangled
Banner" glorifies America's "triumph" over them - and then turns that
reality completely upside down, transforming their killers into the
courageous freedom fighters.
After the U.S. and the British signed a peace treaty at the end of 1814,
the
U.S. government demanded the return of American "property," which by that
point numbered about 6,000 people. The British refused. Most of the 6,000
eventually settled in Canada, with some going to Trinidad, where their
descendants are still known as "Merikins."
Furthermore, if those leading the backlash against Kaepernick need more
inspiration, they can get it from Francis Scott Key's later life.
By 1833, Key was a district attorney for Washington, D.C. As described in a
book called Snowstorm in August by former Washington Post reporter
Jefferson
Morley, the police were notorious thieves, frequently stealing free blacks'
possessions with impunity. One night, one of the constables tried to attack
a woman who escaped and ran away - until she fell off a bridge across the
Potomac and drowned.
"There is neither mercy nor justice for colored people in this district,"
an
abolitionist paper wrote. "No fuss or stir was made about it. She was got
out of the river, and was buried, and there the matter ended."
Key was furious and indicted the newspaper for intending "to injure,
oppress, aggrieve & vilify the good name, fame, credit & reputation of the
Magistrates & constables of Washington County."
You can decide for yourself whether there's some connection between what
happened 200 years ago and what Colin Kaepernick is angry about today.
Maybe
it's all ancient, meaningless history. Or maybe it's not, and Kaepernick is
right, and we really need a new national anthem.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Colin Kaepernick. (photo: Peter Joneleit/Cal Sport Media/AP Images)
https://theintercept.com/2016/08/28/colin-kaepernick-is-righter-than-you-kno
w-the-national-anthem-is-a-celebration-of-slavery/https://theintercept.com/2
016/08/28/colin-kaepernick-is-righter-than-you-know-the-national-anthem-is-a
-celebration-of-slavery/
Colin Kaepernick Is Righter Than You Know: The National Anthem Is a
Celebration of Slavery
By Jon Schwarz, The Intercept
29 August 16
efore a preseason game on Friday, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin
Kaepernick refused to stand for the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner."
When he explained why, he only spoke about the present: "I am not going to
stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people
and people of color. . There are bodies in the street and people getting
paid leave and getting away with murder."
Twitter then went predictably nuts, with at least one 49ers fan burning
Kaepernick's jersey.
Almost no one seems to be aware that even if the U.S. were a perfect
country
today, it would be bizarre to expect African-American players to stand for
"The Star-Spangled Banner." Why? Because it literally celebrates the murder
of African-Americans.
Few people know this because we only ever sing the first verse. But read
the
end of the third verse and you'll see why "The Star-Spangled Banner" is not
just a musical atrocity, it's an intellectual and moral one, too:
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
"The Star-Spangled Banner," Americans hazily remember, was written by
Francis Scott Key about the Battle of Fort McHenry in Baltimore during the
War of 1812. But we don't ever talk about how the War of 1812 was a war of
aggression that began with an attempt by the U.S. to grab Canada from the
British Empire.
However, we'd wildly overestimated the strength of the U.S. military. By
the
time of the Battle of Fort McHenry in 1814, the British had counterattacked
and overrun Washington, D.C., setting fire to the White House.
And one of the key tactics behind the British military's success was its
active recruitment of American slaves. As a detailed 2014 article in
Harper's explains, the orders given to the Royal Navy's Admiral Sir George
Cockburn read:
Let the landings you make be more for the protection of the desertion of
the
Black Population than with a view to any other advantage. . The great point
to be attained is the cordial Support of the Black population. With them
properly armed & backed with 20,000 British Troops, Mr. Madison will be
hurled from his throne.
Whole families found their way to the ships of the British, who accepted
everyone and pledged no one would be given back to their "owners." Adult
men
were trained to create a regiment called the Colonial Marines, who
participated in many of the most important battles, including the August
1814 raid on Washington.
Then on the night of September 13, 1814, the British bombarded Fort
McHenry.
Key, seeing the fort's flag the next morning, was inspired to write the
lyrics for "The Star-Spangled Banner."
So when Key penned "No refuge could save the hireling and slave / From the
terror of flight or the gloom of the grave," he was taking great
satisfaction in the death of slaves who'd freed themselves. His perspective
may have been affected by the fact he owned several slaves himself.
With that in mind, think again about the next two lines: "And the
star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave / O'er the land of the free and
the home of the brave."
The reality is that there were human beings fighting for freedom with
incredible bravery during the War of 1812. However, "The Star-Spangled
Banner" glorifies America's "triumph" over them - and then turns that
reality completely upside down, transforming their killers into the
courageous freedom fighters.
After the U.S. and the British signed a peace treaty at the end of 1814,
the
U.S. government demanded the return of American "property," which by that
point numbered about 6,000 people. The British refused. Most of the 6,000
eventually settled in Canada, with some going to Trinidad, where their
descendants are still known as "Merikins."
Furthermore, if those leading the backlash against Kaepernick need more
inspiration, they can get it from Francis Scott Key's later life.
By 1833, Key was a district attorney for Washington, D.C. As described in a
book called Snowstorm in August by former Washington Post reporter
Jefferson
Morley, the police were notorious thieves, frequently stealing free blacks'
possessions with impunity. One night, one of the constables tried to attack
a woman who escaped and ran away - until she fell off a bridge across the
Potomac and drowned.
"There is neither mercy nor justice for colored people in this district,"
an
abolitionist paper wrote. "No fuss or stir was made about it. She was got
out of the river, and was buried, and there the matter ended."
Key was furious and indicted the newspaper for intending "to injure,
oppress, aggrieve & vilify the good name, fame, credit & reputation of the
Magistrates & constables of Washington County."
You can decide for yourself whether there's some connection between what
happened 200 years ago and what Colin Kaepernick is angry about today.
Maybe
it's all ancient, meaningless history. Or maybe it's not, and Kaepernick is
right, and we really need a new national anthem.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socializehttp://e-max.it/posizioname
nto-siti-web/socialize
