Canada's Indigenous Bands Rise Up Against a Tar Sands Pipeline
By Jim Robbins
Yale Environment 360, Monday, December 15, 2015
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/34019-canada-s-indigenous-bands-rise-up-against-a-tar-sands-pipeline?tmpl=component&print=1
TransCanada is proposing another pipeline, but fierce opposition from
Canada's First Nation communities could derail this controversial project.
Sitting in his office on the outskirts of Montreal, Serge Otis Simon,
council chief of the Kanesatake - a band of Mohawks - is clear about what
might happen if the proposed Energy East Pipeline is routed through the
band's land, in spite of their opposition. "The Warrior Society are men
whose duty is given by creation to protect the land, people, and community,"
he told me, describing a group of Mohawks who go by that name. "I can't
think of a more honorable way to be killed than standing in the way of that
pipeline."
The rhetoric may be extreme, but it reflects the passions surrounding the
debate over oil and gas pipelines in Canada. And it may well not be
hyperbole. The Kanesatake, after all, are the First Nations band that rose
in armed revolt against Quebec and the federal government in 1980 over a
developer's efforts to build a golf course and condominium complex on a
burial site in a sacred pine grove next to their reserve. The two-and-a-half
month standoff ended when the Kanesatake surrendered to police.
Now that President Obama has shot down the contentious Keystone XL
Pipeline - which would have transported oil from the tar sands of northern
Alberta to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast - the spotlight is turning to
Energy East. Proposed by TransCanada, the same company behind Keystone XL,
the Energy East Pipeline is the next most likely conduit for what is known
as unconventional crude. It would run from Alberta nearly 3,000 miles east
to ports in Atlantic Canada, snaking across territory claimed by some 150
First Nations groups.
INVOLVEMENT OF FIRST NATIONS BANDS IN THE ENERGY EAST BATTLE MAY BE THE
TRUMP CARD FOR PIPELINE OPPONENTS.
The involvement of these First Nations bands in the Energy East battle may
well be the trump card for pipeline opponents, which include Canadian and
U.S. environmental groups. The bands have real leverage, claiming that
TransCanada must secure their permission before building pipelines on their
lands - a claim the company disputes. Some bands, like the Kanesatake, have
vowed to block the pipeline at all costs.
Opposition from First Nations communities is one of the main reasons why
what was once considered the top prospect to carry tar sands crude - the
Northern Gateway Pipeline, proposed by Enbridge Inc. to travel from Alberta
some 730 miles to a tanker port on Canada's West Coast - now appears to be
moribund. The pipeline would have crossed the lands of more than 130
different First Nations, some of whom also promised armed resistance, and
required oil tankers to navigate the ecologically sensitive and stormy
Hecate Strait, a traditional First Nation fishing grounds.
The Energy East Pipeline is different from Keystone XL in one major
respect - it's an all-Canada line, and needs no approval from an American
president. The 42-inch-diameter pipeline, if built, would be one of the
largest by volume in North America, able to transport 1.1 million barrels of
tar sands crude per day, nearly a third more oil than was proposed for
Keystone. The pipeline would leave the oil tank farm of Hardisty, Alberta,
head south, then quickly dog-leg to the east across Saskatchewan, Manitoba,
Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick to tanker loading facilities and
refineries in eastern Canada.
Most of Energy East would incorporate existing gas pipeline that will be
"repurposed" to carry diluted bitumen, or dilbit, which is what producers
call the molasses-like tar sands crude from northern Alberta. New pipeline
would be constructed through the eastern half of Quebec and the Maritime
provinces.
While it avoids a U.S. crossing, Energy East still has plenty of opposition,
both inside and outside Canada, because it would provide a way for much
larger amounts of the landlocked tar sands oil to find a way to export
markets. This would likely mean an expansion of tar sands mining, although
the recently elected premier of Alberta has announced a sharp change of
course in climate policy from the previous conservative provincial
government, including a limit on tar sands carbon emissions.
Many opponents say it's time to put an end to projects such as the tar sands
and Energy East. "The endless expansion of the fossil fuel industry is the
thing that makes the math of climate change impossible," climate activist
Bill McKibben said. "And we're fighting that tooth and nail." His group,
350.org, is now taking on Energy East and is working with Clayton
Thomas-Muller, a Cree from a northern Manitoba band, the Puktawagan.
Thomas-Muller is organizing First Nations across Canada to fight Energy East
and the tar sands.
ENERGY EAST WOULD CROSS 961 SEPARATE BODIES OF WATER, INCLUDING MAJOR RIVERS
SUCH AS THE ST. LAWRENCE.
In addition to the large-scale CO2 emissions associated with the Energy East
Pipeline, another major issue is the threat to the many streams and lakes it
would cross. Canada has 20 percent of the world's freshwater, and Energy
East would cross 961 separate bodies of water, including major rivers such
as the St. Lawrence and Rideau, according to the Council of Canadians, a
national environmental group. TransCanada touts its high-tech leak-detection
systems. But last summer a state-of-the-art-Nexen pipeline ruptured and
spilled a million gallons of gooey, heavy crude into the boreal forest in
northern Alberta, and the spill went undetected for two weeks.
If it gushes into a creek or lake, dilbit, much heavier than conventional
crude, quickly sinks and is far harder to clean up. Five years after the
spill of more than a million gallons in the Kalamazoo River from a pipeline
rupture, thick deposits of dilbit still lie at the bottom, impossible to
remove. The cleanup has already cost more than $1 billion.
"Energy East goes right through Winnipeg - in fact, it goes right through
Shoal Lake First Nations Territory," said Thomas-Muller. "Shoal Lake is the
single largest source of water for the city of Winnipeg."
And while some of Energy East's pipeline is modern double-walled pipe, about
80 percent of the repurposed pipe is 40 years old and has a much thinner
single wall, about the width of a pencil. Because of its viscosity, dilbit
is pumped under more heat and pressure than conventional crude, and some
critics contend it makes the pipe more susceptible to rupture, though one
U.S. study says that is not the case.
Moreover, opponents have raised questions about the chemicals mixed with the
heavy crude to help it flow, called diluents. TransCanada won't reveal what
diluents it uses, calling it proprietary information. But it's likely that
benzene, a known carcinogen, is one of them, experts say.
FIRST NATIONS HAVE BEEN UP AGAINST FORMIDABLE OPPONENTS IN THEIR PIPELINE
BATTLES.
The opposition also is concerned about increased oil tanker traffic in the
waters off eastern Canada. TransCanada just canceled plans for a loading
facility near Riviere-du-Loup in Quebec because it would have been situated
in beluga whale habitat. But as planned, the overall project would
significantly increase tanker traffic in the Bay of Fundy, which has the
highest tides in the world and is home to endangered northern right whales -
one of seven whale species there - and a thriving commercial fishery.
In recent years, First Nations have been up against formidable opponents in
their pipeline battles, especially the recently defeated Conservative
government of Stephen Harper. "He rolled back much of Canada's environmental
law," Thomas-Muller said. "But the one area they haven't been able to take
away is the powerful legal regime of aboriginal law. That's why First
Nations are at the forefront of this battle for civilization and the most
successful environmental campaign in history."
Harper was also able to pass C-51, widely considered a draconian
anti-terrorism bill, styled after the Patriot Act, which included in its
definitions of terror anyone who interferes with "critical infrastructure"
or the "economic and financial stability" of Canada.
The Conservatives were defeated in October elections, and that has changed
the political landscape on energy development, though precisely how remains
to be seen. The Liberal Party, which came to power, voted for C 51, but has
said it will amend it. The new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, has struck a
far more accommodating tone with environmental groups and, according to
Serge Simon, "made significant overtures to First Nations."
Still, the oil industry remains one of Canada's largest economic sectors and
it needs pipelines to export its product. Trudeau supported the Keystone XL
Pipeline, but didn't weigh in on Energy East during the election campaign.
In early November his foreign minister, Stephane Dion signaled that the new
government is behind Energy East - with caveats. "We support this," he told
the Toronto Globe and Mail. "But we want it to be done properly, and it will
be difficult to do if we don't strengthen the process... of communications
with communities and the process of scientific environmental assessment."
"WE'LL DO WHAT WE CAN TO STOP IT," ONE MOHAWK LEADER SAYS OF THE PIPELINE.
"THE COMMUNITY DOESN'T WANT IT."
The area where the Energy East pipeline would pass through Kanesatake
territory is a beautiful region of provincial parks, rolling green hills,
farms and orchards at the confluence of the St. Lawrence and Ottawa Rivers.
It also would run along the Lake of Two Mountains, which, besides
recreation, also provides drinking water to much of this part of Quebec.
Many officials in Quebec and Ontario have signaled their opposition to the
pipeline, saying it's more trouble than it's worth. First Nations groups are
especially riled about Energy East after losing the battle over pipeline 9b,
an Enbridge gas line in Quebec that was built to carry light crude but will
be used for heavy tar sands crude.
Another Mohawk band to the south of Montreal also is fighting Energy East.
Clinton Phillips, who administers the land portfolio for this band, was
raised a Catholic and attended a Catholic church in Kahnawake, built by
Jesuits in 1656. As he walked through the church and looked at the stations
of the cross, their titles written in Mohawk, he talked about how much it
meant to him when Pope Francis issued his encyclical on the environment
earlier this year. Coupled with the traditional aboriginal respect for the
land, he said, "We'll do what we can stop it [the pipeline]. The community
doesn't want it."
TransCanada is undeterred. "Pipelines are the safest and most efficient way
to move products like oil, especially large volumes, over longer distances,"
TransCanada spokesman Davis Sheremata said in an email. "Everyone who
transports products like oil wants to see it done safely and efficiently."
The First Nations of Canada are now emboldened. The price of oil has fallen
precipitously, their archenemy Harper is gone, and the realization that the
world is rapidly warming is growing. With October's dramatic election
outcome, the Canadian energy battlefield has tilted in their favor. But none
of the First Nation pipeline opponents believe the fight over Energy East is
over.
"We're the doorway," said Simon. "If we stop it here it won't happen. So
we'll continue fighting."
Jim Robbins is a veteran journalist based in Helena, Montana. He has written
for The New York Times, Conde Nast Traveler and numerous other publications.
His latest book is The Man Who Planted Trees: Lost Groves, Champion Trees,
and an Urgent Plan to Save the Planet. In a recent article for Yale
Environment 360, he reported on the rapid decline of the world's boreal
forests.
RELATED STORIES
Indigenous Leaders Targeted in Battle to Protect Forests
By Michelle Tullo, Inter Press Service | Report
Indigenous Seed Savers Gather in the Andes, Agree to Fight Climate Change
With Biodiversity
By Erin Sagen, YES! Magazine | Report
TransCanada's Keystone XL Permit Renewal Hearing Sheds Light on Serious
Pipeline Risks
By Julie Dermansky, DeSmogBlog | Report
