Okay, Mustafa, let me tell you what happens after death. I will
concentrate on what happens to the person rather than the body. It is
important to understand what the person, or personality, is. All of our
thoughts, all of our memories, all of our emotions, everything that
makes up personhood, is the result of highly organized electro-chemical
reactions that occur in the brain. This organization of those
electro-chemical reactions was built up over millions and millions of
years by the evolutionary algorithm. That is, when a particular
organizational form of structure conferred a survival and reproductive
advantage on certain individuals those individuals survived to reproduce
and pass the structure on to future generations by inheritance. The ones
that did not survive to reproduce failed to contribute their inheritance
to future generations. Over the millions of millions of years that were
available for this algorithm to work some fantastically complex
structures were built up. That includes the human mind. Now with that
understanding it is also true that when an individual dies that
structure is disrupted. The electro-chemical reactions cease and the
organization deteriorates and disperses. That means that all thought,
all memories, all emotions, everything that makes up personality and
personhood cease. There is no memory. there is no thought. There is no
awareness. It is all gone. There are entire libraries of documented
scientific research to back this up and all the results of this research
are consistent. If you think something else happens then tell us what it
is and tell us how you refute those entire libraries of consistent
results of scientific research. Can you do that? Or are you just going
to make unsupported claims again? Are you going to use circular logic
again where you assume the conclusion to reach the conclusion? Are you
going to be arrogant and claim that you are right in the face of all of
this evidence? That is, are you going to continue to make an utter fool
of yourself?
On 9/17/2017 4:50 PM, Bob wrote:
I enthusiastically embolden those who are talented with knavery to critically revise their stance. Despite the plain presence of tangible evidence, their unprecedented gallantness is relentlessly invariant. I attended a funeral ceremony today. I recognised then, that death is incontrovertible. It is a stiff fact. However, it is certainly a barrel of laughs when I see those disbelievers paltering, absurdly attempting to sound realistic and reasonable in their conception. I do not have much time to read everything you post. I just recall Joe's smuttily obscene rhetoric. This guy demonstrated in the highest level possible what I call typical American imbecility. People then complained about affaire d'honneur. I just would like to ask one question, has anyone of you considered incineration upon death? I give you open reprieve to thoroughly ponder on what I proposed. I genuinely have a beef with your incorrect sense of logic. The reason why I proposed this, is to see, will you be resurrected after your body is reduced to ashes? What do you expect to encounter in the grave? You need to sort out bits and bobs in advanced of presumably auditing philosophical subjects. I furthermore urge you to refrain from uttering odious remarks. It won't make you any better. It is absolutely disgusting. I take your pretentious sense of logic with a pinch of salt. The denial of a deity is a bitter pill to swallow. You are not looking for a sign. You are sticking to what makes you feel fine. I renew my proposition of vivid reflexion and accurate examination. This vast and staggeringly organised universe couldn't be rationally spontaneous. Finally, some of the phrases I used above are based on British idiomatic expressions. They are essentially colloquial. So, give me a shout if you need anything. British English is adequately genteel, idyllic and eloquent, even its conversational dialects.
Adieu, Bob
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
