[bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: "mickey" <micka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:46:23 -0400
I think I'll do pretty much the same job I've always done, because I think all
of us are doing our best. I don't know that we should change our criteria for
accepting or rejecting a book. We validators work hard to make the best product
we can. Because we've changed our rate of pay, I don't quite understand what
that has to do with the scanners. Maybe I'm missing something.
Mickey Prahin
check out this exciting business opportunity and it's totally free!!!
http://www.mypowermall.com/biz/home/4941
e-mail micka@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 614-670-4011
Windows Live Messenger: micka@xxxxxxxxxx
Skype: micka529
Cell: 614-499-3505
----- Original Message -----
From: Lori Castner
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 5:31 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
I don't get it; why do you think validators should get tougher because they
are now being paid more? Don't mean to be dense, but don't get it.
Cat Lover Lori
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:28 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] yes, let's get tough.
Hi listers,
Since bookshare has seen fit to raise credit for validators, we should get
tough.
I was just up on the step one page, and the first two books I looked at,
were shown to be fair with many errors.
My suggestion is this. If you know a book is fair with many errors, why are
you submitting it at all? If I get a book like that, chances are, I'm likely to
reject it. If you can't check your scans, clean them up and make them good,
then don't do it. Sure, I have submitted books that weren't good, and I had to
learn a lot of things, and I understand that. When you first start out you mess
up. I understand that, but come on, some of these books weren't submitted by
new folks just learning. We all have to do the best scans we can, it is up to
us, and no one else.
Jim Rawls
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.