I just take mine out as I get to each page. Cindy Lou Ray. Each day is a new adventure. ----- Original Message ----- From: "maithe007" <maithe007@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:11 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough. Robert, I have a question about the headers. I am afraid to use the header/footer stripper in my Openbook...should I be doing this with all my scans? I am afraid I will distort the text. Thanks in advance. Maithe ----- Original Message ----- From: "robert tweedy" <roberttweedy@xxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:56 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough. > Thanks Monica you explained it better than I did. I have seen a few > books > with the headers still in them and there have a lot of books with > errors > in them but I am not on anyone's case or anything All of us that > includes > scanners have to do a better job. > Skype contact bobwichitaks phone 316-524-5454 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Monica Willyard" <rhyami@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 7:55 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough. > > >> Hi, Mickey. I think people are basically saying that since we're >> being >> paid more credit to validate, let's do a good job and not just pass >> stuff through the system. In the past, some people would validate a >> bunch of books to earn a year's membership. They didn't spend much >> time >> in individual books because they knew they'd have had to validate >> 100 >> books in a year to earn next year's membership. That has changed >> now. I >> could be wrong, but I think people are just encouraging each other >> to >> raise the bar of what's acceptable validation. You have always been >> a >> careful validater, Mickey, so I don't see that this would change a >> lot >> for you. (smile) You taught me a lot about being a good validater. >> I >> used to be the kind of person who would just get a book and read >> it, >> ignoring small errors and only stopping if I literally couldn't >> read >> something. That has changed, and you, Sue, Katie, and Elizabeth are >> all >> responsible for helping me make that change. It didn't happen >> overnight >> or even over a period of weeks. It took me a good year or more to >> finally understand and then incorporate careful validation >> principles >> into how I do things. It's taken another year for me to refine the >> process, to use a system to do these things quickly and >> comfortably. >> >> Monica Willyard >> >> >> mickey wrote: >>> I think I'll do pretty much the same job I've always done, because >>> I >>> think all of us are doing our best. I don't know that we should >>> change >>> our criteria for accepting or rejecting a book. We validators work >>> hard to make the best product we can. Because we've changed our >>> rate >>> of pay, I don't quite understand what that has to do with the >>> scanners. Maybe I'm missing something. >>> >>> >>> Mickey Prahin >>> >> > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a > list > of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject > line. > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. __________ NOD32 2541 (20070920) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.