[bksvol-discuss] Re: volunteers who are not contributing

  • From: "Kaitlyn Hill" <Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:18:39 -0700


These types of suggestions could be managed by a coordinator. "a person who
is volunteering may not want to be on a busier list like this but the
valuable information could still be distributed. 

Healing Practitioner
"The cost of a thing is the amount of what I call life, which is required to
be exchanged for it immediately or in the long run."
Henry Thoreau 

-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of E.
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 2:03 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: volunteers who are not contributing

Quickest way to deal with that is to download a book with a fair submission 
from step 2 list and reject it with the kind of message I suggest from a 
staff member.  Something like "sentences repeatedly cut off in an orderly 
manner.  Usual cause is not holding down binding."  Folks the reasons a 
book is truly in need of rejection rather than a thorough going over with a 
new version of k1000 can be easily made into informative messages.

I think a person submitting who has a version of k1000 should be asked to 
learn the optimize feature.  It requires pressing one key and accepting the 
suggestions of the software.  It radically improves scans.  We need more 
ways for submitters to learn how to do things well, encouragement for those 
who do and rejection for some of the things we as validators are being 
asked to fix.

If someone gets repeated notices that their fair rated books are being 
rejected, we will not have to outlaw fair submissions.  They will 
decrease.  The stuff truly worth fixing will be fixed.

Other related posts: