I agree Dasha. Jackie Sent from my iPhone On Jun 4, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Dasha Radford <dasha95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I understand that a lot of people like it and a lot of people didn't like it > but seriously is there any need for all the in my opinion rather unhelpful > contention? As I see it it doesn't get anybody anywhere and things will > happen as they will whether any of us like it or not. We may have input but > it's not like the volunteers are the only ones who run bookshare. We do a lot > but we can't and don't do everything. There are some positions that we don't > fill thank goodness. And it may be a mess if this list does come to fruition > but then again it might not be as I say let's cross that bridge when we come > to it and agree to disagree if anyone is so inclined. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:42 PM, "Judy s." <cherryjam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Thanks, Mayrie! That makes more sense. >> >> I'll shuffle my cantankerous self back to my den now. smile. >> >> Judy s. >> >> On 6/4/2012 8:15 PM, Mayrie ReNae wrote: >>> >>> Hi Judy, >>> >>> I think it's just for people who are interested in being involved. >>> >>> Mayrie >>> >>> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judy s. >>> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 7:50 PM >>> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: volunteers : was: A Plan for More Work (was >>> Acdcent Marks) >>> >>> Am I missing something here? >>> >>> Is this new list of who likes what that's going to be used to create paired >>> scanners and proofreaders supposed to be for just those volunteers who like >>> the idea, or are all of us suddenly being asked to jump on another >>> bandwagon? >>> >>> If this is intended for all volunteers, it has all the potential to >>> be yet another administrative nightmare, and would make no sense to me. >>> >>> Just my (somewhat jaded) opinion! smile. >>> >>> Judy >>>