[bksvol-discuss] Re: validator's name included with books on the system

  • From: "Bob" <rwiley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:43:57 -0500

I totally agree. That way, the validator can share the glory or ignominy with the scanner.


Perhaps it's just vanity, but I feel I've done books that I am very proud of, and I have also done books I'd rather forget. Either way, I'd like others to know so they can give me kudos (preferred) or constructive criticism so I can do better in the future.

Can anyone give me a reason why a validator's name shouldn't be given along with the submitter? I can think of none.

Good shot E.

Bob
----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 6:24 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] validator's name included with books on the system


I whole heartedly support having the validator's name included with a book when it enters the collection.

E.

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.5/1537 - Release Date: 7/6/2008 5:26 AM



To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: