[bksvol-discuss] Re: txt page breaks redux
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:29:43 -0600
Great, in which case my opinion stands. No page breaks? No problem. . .
will reject.
Guido
Guido Dante Corona
IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx.
Research Division,
Phone: 512. 838. 9735.
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.ibm.com/able
"Mary Otten" <maryotten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
12/28/2004 10:15 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss
To
"bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: txt page breaks redux
Guido,
My point was limited strictly to the matter of page breaks as the sole
reason for rejection. I said nothing about badly scanned text which, I
agree, should be zapped without a second thought, as it is not readable by
anyone. My hat is off to the people with the time to fix up messes. I
won't presume to tell Cindy or anybody else that they shouldn't spend that
time if they want to do it. But the subject line of this thread has to do
with
page breaks, and my objections were thus limited to mass rejections based
on their absence without regard to text quality factors. Until we get more
word from Marissa, it would seem to be over zealous to reject on the
basis of absent page breaks alone.
Mary
Other related posts:
