[bksvol-discuss] Re: to Jim, why your book was rejected

  • From: Jill O'Connell <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 09:12:35 -0800

I basically had a similar situation which is why I think it should be a 
volunteer requirement  to be on this list. Besides, I have found it very 
valuable as a validator to be able to contact the scanner and thus end up with 
the best book possible. The help we get from each other on this list is, in my 
opinion, invaluable.  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Amber Wallenstein 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 9:49 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] to Jim, why your book was rejected

  Hi Jim P:
  I rejected your book The Book of Ruth, because I just uploaded an excellent 
copy of the book.  This is why it's so important for the links on the wish list 
to be removed and they are not doing it.  Now I will not work on wish list 
books for fear my efforts will be duplicated.  If the wish list is not updated, 
it is totally pointless, in my opinion.


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.11/191 - Release Date: 12/2/2005

Other related posts: