[bksvol-discuss] Re: scanner
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 07:50:35 -0500
Sharon, have you ever timed the 2400 scanner on a full page at 300 DPI? I
know the 1660 can do a complete pass with Kurzweil in approx 9 seconds,
but I understand 2400 may be a little slower.
Guido
Guido D. Corona
IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx.
IBM Research,
Phone: (512) 838-9735
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html
"Sharon Jackson" <dolly1025@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
05/27/2004 06:55 AM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss
To
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: scanner
I, too, use Epson. My home scanner is a 2400 model while my work scanner
is
a 1660. Both are great and I do not think I would return to an HP
Scanner.
Sharon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <rhod3021@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:28 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanner
> I like my Epson, smile, and the only scanner the State Agency in PA at
least
> the Erie office is buying right now.
>
> The Epson 1660 can have a opage done a lot quicker than 25 seconds.
>
>
> Shelley L. Rhodes and Judson, guiding golden
> juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "We give dogs time we can spare, space we can spare and love we can
> spare.
> And in return, dogs give us their all. It's the best deal man has ever
> made" - M. Facklam
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
