[bksvol-discuss] Re: rejecting poor quality "raw scans"

  • From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:49:01 -0400

I notice a lot of the poor scans fall into distinct groups.

It might be possible to work out settings templates for these various groups.

We can provide these templates for people using, say, kurzweil.

Settings templates might include
Harlequin romance
Thorndike Press
Tor Books
Silhouette Romance

We can provide these templates for the less computer savvy among us though the optimize feature requires the user to only use one button. The fact that poor scans are being produced either means the submitter does not have access to software with such features or cannot use the software.

We also may want to train each other perhaps in the chat room in better use of software to produce scans.

We validators really love you folks who give us beautiful scans!!


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: