[bksvol-discuss] Re: rejecting poor quality "raw scans"
- From: "Lori Castner" <loralee.castner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:20:28 -0700
Hello, E.
I think you make a very valid point. For new volunteers, it seems to take
courage to say that a book needs to be rejected. But when there are too
many errors, a person just can't correct them without a print copy of the
book. And, even for those who can compare the print with the scanned copy,
time is just too valuable to spend hours editing.
And, I will have to remind myself of these things when it comes time for me
to reject a book for the first time.
Lori Castner
----- Original Message -----
From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 11:29 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] rejecting poor quality "raw scans"
If folks mine "raw scans" so much, does this mean validators will get up
the courage to reject the 25 or so truly poor quality books currently on
step 1? Only a few of us seem to be willing to reject truly awful scans.
I do give specifics for the submitter. I am sorry to say that the same
people seem to submit poor scans and do not seem to heed specific
feedback.
E.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
