[bksvol-discuss] Re: reasons for rejection
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:39:22 -0500
There is a place for comments in books you approve as well... I never pput
them in the lon synopsis...
Sue S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 8:43 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: reasons for rejection
I may be wrong, but this is my guess. I rejected a
couple of books with no reasons given. Then it
occurred to me that if I put my reasons in the
Comments section, which I think is on the page two
underneath the Accept or Reject, that the
administrators would see it and it would get conveyed
to the submitter. I know that the Comments don't go
into the collection whenthe book is approved, so if we
want to warn or notify readers of anything, like
dialect or possibly Adult material or profanity if we
haven't checked Adult, we have to add it to the long
synopsis. But, as I say, I assume that the
administrators read the Comments section for a
Rejected book.
As far as getting people to do it, your appreciation
of knowing why your book was rejected and our
discussion here may have some effect. Of course, if
I'm wrong about that use of the Comments section,
presumably someone will let us know.
Cindy
--- bud schwab <budschwab@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Cindy,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. If the validators have a
> place to put the reason
> for rejection I would hope at they would always put
> it in there. It is
> very frustrating to the person who sends the book in
> to not know why it has
> been rejected. How can we get all the validators
> to put in that information?
> Thanks.
>
> Bud
>
>
> >Hi, Bud,
> >
> >When I rejected a couple of books a while ago )not
> >yours) I noticed that one could write comments, so
> I
> >put the reasons. I don't know if the reasons for
> >rejection always have to come from the validator
> who
> >rejects or if yours came from the admdinistrators.
> As
> >you say, it would be nice to always have the
> reasons.
> >If it's something the administrators are now going
> to,
> >that's great. If it's something the validator
> should
> >do, perhaps your appreciation will remind
> validators
> >who reject to include the reasons why.
> >
> >Cindy
> >- bud schwab <budschwab@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey gang, I got a reject notice today and it
> also
> > > gave the reason. This is
> > > great if they're going to continue that.
> Actually
> > > it said it was rejected
> > > because it was already in the list of books.
> I'll
> > > have to check more
> > > carefully before I send a book in. I think it's
> > > great that they give the
> > > reason now.
> > >
> > > Bud Schwab
> > > W 6 Z Y P
> > > Malibu, California
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> >http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
>
> Bud Schwab
> W 6 Z Y P
> Malibu, California
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
