[bksvol-discuss] Re: question about Hold For A Sighted Person: Ten Days To Self-Esteem
- From: jlc <whoschu@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks, Valerie.
I don't mind doing the work and I agree it would be an asset. I can do tables
and wouldn't mind.
I'm mostly trying to figure out some baselines on things, since I've only been
around a few months.
Cheers, Julie
________________________________
From: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 4:32:23 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: question about Hold For A Sighted Person: Ten
Days
To Self-Esteem
We were going to work on it or re-scan it since the tables did not come across
well. It was something I committed to as a new volunteer and was overwhelmed,
but should probably give it another shot when things settle down. Amber sent
me
a copy of the book, but at the time, I did not know how to create tables.
If I rescan it, Doug could probably proof it or I could just scan the pages he
needs redone. I think it would be an asset to the collection, it is just a lot
of work, regardless of how it is tackled...
Valerie
On May 10, 2011, at 5:03 PM, jlc wrote:
I've noticed this book (Hold For A Sighted Person: Ten Days To Self-Esteem) on
the checkout list. Is it being held for a specific person? If so, then ignore
this message and I apologize for poking my nose in where I don't belong.
>
>It was originally submitted in April, 2008 so I checked it out to look it over
>for proofreading. There are several problems with it, including a few passages
>of text that didn't scan well (at least I can't make it out), and tables and
>charts that need to be checked against a physical copy of the book to be able
>to
>make sense of them.
>
>My question is, is there a reason this should not be rejected? I'm asking
>because I'm still trying to figure out the line between rejecting something
>and
>being able to get most of a book clear. I work mostly on nonfiction, so it's
>often a question for me.
>
>Thanks to all.
>
>Julie
>
Other related posts:
