I think of "lots of errors . . ." as listening to classical music over shortwave. I hope I don't miss an important moment, key change, or the like, but I can figure out--interpolate--what's missing to some extent. Now, it's worth saying that I don't listen to music over shortwave unless I'm killing time and am pretty desperate. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Otten" <maryotten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:56 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: poor rated books > Not all fair rated books are fair. Put enough dialect slang and/or foreign words into a book, and what would have been a good rating can easily become fair. Also, if you submit a book and forget to change the default > rating, its rated fair. While I understand and share your frustration with books that are full of garbled text, missing words and the like, its worth noting that there are sometimes books that are unjustifiably rated fair. If you > download one and it turns out to have earned its rating, you can always nuke it. I still have problems with the idea of lots of errors and legible throughout. To me, those are not compatible concepts. > mary > > > >