[bksvol-discuss] Re: poor rated books

  • From: Pam Quinn <quinns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:28:27 -0500

I agree. And it doesn't seem quite right that fair ratings receive as
much credit as excellents, especially since we shouldn't be producing
books with fair ratings at all at this point.


On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:49:40 -0400, you wrote:

>I notice books on the step 1 page with fair or poor ratings.  Given the 
>kind of tools we have for software and the improvements in scanners in the 
>past five years or so, what excuse can there possibly be for submitting 
>books with "Many errors but legible throughout"?  They take a lot of time 
>to validate and sometimes cannot be fixed at all.  I just do not understand 
>such submissions unless they are books which have a lot of graphics or 
>something which the scanner software cannot grok.

Other related posts: