Correct Pratik, while I do enjoy adding some jocularity, my comments/concerns about quality are intended in absolute earnest. Guido Dante Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. IBM Research, Phone: (512) 838-9735 Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able "Pratik Patel" <pratikp1@xxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 12/13/2004 03:22 AM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: plesure reading quality&quality standards I don't think Guido is kiddin here. Besides, if he is, then, I'm not. I perfectly agree with sentiments expressed regarding the quality standards needing to be more rigorous. Pratik Pratik Patel Interim Director Office of Special Services Queens College Director CUNY Assistive Technology Services The City University of New York ppatel@xxxxxx From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Morales Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:50 AM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: plesure reading quality&quality standards Oh, Guido, you're full of it! *smile* You're taking advantage of all the poor, gullible people on here who don't know you well enough and it's sad! Take care. Julie Morales Email and Windows/MSN Messenger: inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a rainbow in your heart. ----- Original Message ----- From: Guido Corona To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 2:45 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: plesure reading quality&quality standards Sue and Gisela, you are perfetly correct. Romances should be published with the same care given to any other categories. I am not a reader of romance, but it does bug me to no end that readers of the genre feel they have to put up with so much low quality c*r*a*p, just because "it is for enjoyment alone!" At the closing of 2004 there is simply no excuse for consistently submitting trash-recognition-quality books to the repository. If any volunteer needs assistance in learning how to produce a quality etext, I will be delighted to assist. If the reco program used is not adequate and is too old, and produces consistent low quality, the tool needs to be replaced. Finally, if anyone needs more info about the great Helvetico-Caschubian scholar Aloysius Qwantz Schmaltenstein Gavronsky, please let me know, as most of his works are sadly out of print, and even the Appenzell reference library has recently moved them from the main stacks to the boiler room, to make space for the complete English language collection of Better Funeral Homes, and Happy Undertaker's Weekly. G. Guido Dante Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. IBM Research, Phone: (512) 838-9735 Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 12/12/2004 12:44 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: plesure reading quality&quality standards What it says in the validation instructions is rating of errors as excellent, good or fair. That means, and says, word recognition errors which means scanning errors. Scanners do misinterpret words sometimees, but what poor quality means is that the book could not be corrected by the validator because there was so much missing, or so many places where the errors were undecipherable that the validator was unable to correct them and has to reject the book. It has nothing to do with the book itself. A lot of us enjoy light romances. Sue ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gisela Vazquez" <gvazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 12:22 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] plesure reading quality&quality standards Someone clearly stated that if it was light reading, like romance, quality was not as important. I for one enjoy reading romance and feel that I still deserve quality. I may have missed that post but I don't believe that plesure reading should nor will be relegated to lower quality standards. The question is what is meant by quality? What should be looked at to decide that question from most to least importants. Gisela