[bksvol-discuss] Re: pages not coordinating
- From: "mickey" <micka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:08:02 -0500
What I do was suggested by Kurzweil. I open the .rtf file, then save it to
Kurzweil. It retains the proper pagination. Otherwise, if I keep the book in
.rtf format, every time I open Kurzweil I get more pages. This was a real treat
when I was doing ON THE AIR: since the 740-page book became 2600 pages. I took
them out manually, but asked some questions. Their suggestion was to always
save in .kes format.
hth.
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: Vic Llanes
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:07 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: pages not coordinating
It happens to me all the time, I mean, I validate lots of books that have
that problem. If I like the book I would painstakingly go through the whole
thing and synchronize the printed page numbers and the actual page breaks. What
I do is to put new pagebreak by hitting control enter and then to remove all
the misplaced pagebreaks. Kurzweil is really very good and convenient as a
validating and fix it tool.
One thing that can cost this kind of problem is when you use MsWord to export
to RTF. Word thinks that it knows better and move the pages around that is why
I use WordPad to make a clean RTF for the final submission.
Vic
----- Original Message -----
From: Jill O'Connell
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:07 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] pages not coordinating
I hope I can explain this so that I can get some much needed help. I am
validating a book in Kurzweil; it has an RTF extension and I have not changed
it. When Kurzweil states a number change, I see this on the screen. When a book
page number occurs there is no screen movement and these two functions are in
no way occurring at the same time. Kurzweil says there are 544 pages in the
book; the last actual print page number is 310 and this was verified with the
submitter. Can someone tell me what the problem is here and do I need to be
concerned about it? It is an excellent scan and I surely don't want to reject
the book. I have not tried to change the extension to KES but should I do so?
TIA. Jill
Other related posts:
