Have you already changed the default setting of one page mode to two page mode? Another thing to look at is maybe the recognition of columns. Sometimes when I scan a page like the table of contents I get a list of chapter numbers, then a list of chapter titles, then a list of page numbers. With something like this I think it's easier to rescan the page and turn off column recognition, though in most cases I leave column recognition on for scanning newspapers and magazines. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yvette" <yerton365@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 1:24 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: openbook losing page breaks when converting to rtf? > I am very new at scanning, but I am now scanning a book with the Openbook > program and I am seeing what you describe. I am scanning two pages at once, > and I occasionally find two page numbers at the bottom of the scanned page. > But, at other times, it puts the pages numbers at the bottom of each page > where they belong. I don't understand this. > > Why does openbook combine some pages, and keep other separate? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Otten" <maryotten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 1:21 AM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] openbook losing page breaks when converting to > rtf? > > > > Hi folks, > > I'm presently validating a book which started life as an arc file and was > > converted to rtf before uploading. I'm told by the submitter of the book > > that it was scanned two pages at once, but with each page seen as its > > own separate page. That is, the pagination should have been properly > > retained. Yet some of the pages have been combined in this rtf file, such > > that you get two printed pages on one page of the rtf file. I'm validating > > in K1000. Has anybody seen this before with Openbook rtfs? I wonder if > > Openbook did it when it made the conversion, or if K1000 did it when the > > file was opened? Anybody got any experience with this? > > Mary > > > > > > > > > > > >