[bksvol-discuss] Re: my disappointment

  • From: "Gary Petraccaro" <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:02:00 -0400

I know how you feel and will try to help with titles in my collection. I'll list the books I'm intending to do which need rescanning and which books I'm willing to add to my stack.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jill O'Connell" <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:09 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] my disappointment


I know I'm preaching to the choir here but I guess I hope someone from
Bookshare staff will see this and begin to think how the situation can be
improved. I am presently reading for pleasure Out of the Deep I cry by
Julia Spencer-fleming. It is a mystery and I highly recommend her books for
you mystery buffs out there. This book has an excellent rating and was
scanned, of course, by the infamous bookshare volunteer. I may be
exaggerating a bit but there is hardly a page in this book that does not
have a mistake of some type, including such things as die for the, mat for
that, etc. etc. My point in talking about this is to say that it is obvious
that neither the submitter nor the validator read this book. In my opinion
if the submitter has not read the book being submitted, this should be made
clear, then hopefully only a validator who is interested in reading the
book should take it. I can understand if someone volunteers to scan a book
on the wish list that they are really not that interested in, but in that
case it is even more important that thevalidator wants to read the book. If
no validator wants to read it including the person who put it on the wish
list, then I would suggest that the book isn't worth being in the
colection. I hope some day I feel like taking the time to rescan this book
because I am ashamed that it will be left on the excellent list otherwise.
And, of course, that means Bookshare will pay $10 instead of $5 to have the
book in the collection. I know this book can't have been in the collection
for a long time by the way it is presented in braille. That means that
scanners are capable of doing a far better job  of scanning than is seen
here. I recently validated a book submitted by Jim Baugh and you know what
a great job he does. I was reading the book along with others and realized
I was really holding up his book too long so I put it through Kurzweil's
paces and submitted it. When I picked it up later as an approved book to
finish reading it, I recorded 22 mistakes that I had missed. That is an
acceptable number even though I feel bad about it but I think it proves how
necessary it is that someone, be it submitter or validator really reads the
book from cover to cover. And now that validators are being paid $2.50 per
book, that means that only twenty books need to be read carefully per year
in order to maintain a free membership. Thank you all for letting me vent
and I sincerely hope that the Bookshare staff can find some way to express
these concerns to those volunteers not on this list. Jill
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: