[bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:28:03 -0600
Mike, you truly naile the pickle on the head!
Guido
Guido Dante Corona
IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx.
Research Division,
Phone: 512. 838. 9735.
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.ibm.com/able
Mike Pietruk <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
12/30/2004 07:00 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss
To
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
Guido
I like both of your ideas relative to the submission quality assessment as
well as that related to adult content.
While the experienced user using a package such as K1K may be able to
accurately gauge the confidence rating of the book, it sort of puts the
cassual or beginning submitter in a pickle.
Let the software provide the guidance which the submitter can choose to
accept or override.
Similarily, the system ought to alert the submitter that a category for
the book hasn't been provided.
While I don't think requiring a category assignment ought to be mandatory
as some books may not fit one, the submitter ought to be prompted at least
once reminding them of the fact they might have overlooked this item.
Other related posts:
