[bksvol-discuss] inaccuracy in a history
- From: "Kasondra Payne" <Kassyp36@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:44:10 -0600
I have been working on the Routledge Historical Atlas of Religion in
America, and I have a weird situation. The book was scanned very well, at
it appears that the text is complete. However, I found some factual
inaccuracies in one chapter of this book. Now I don’t want to spur
religious attacks, but it is very important to get the story straight. This
wasn’t a case of misspelling a name. The authors inaccurately represented
an event and individuals involved. Now, I don’t know everything about all
religions, but this makes me wonder if there are other inaccuracies that I
wouldn’t know about. I have never seen this as a reason to reject a book,
but as I said when it comes to something that is supposed to be a history,
the story must be right. Any recommendations?
Kasondra Payne
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/372 - Release Date: 6/21/2006
Other related posts:
