[bksvol-discuss] Re: copyright question
- From: "Jake Brownell" <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:26:30 -0500
Hey Scott,
Nope, definitely doesn't need a new copyright. Sometimes new publishers
put out a different edition/format of the same material. So a different
ISBN, but the old copyright stands.
Approved one earlier today in fact that was copyright in 1985, but that
particular Aladdin paperback had begun printing in 1997.
Cheers!
Jake
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Blanks" <scottsjb@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] copyright question
> Hi all,
>
> Just finished scanning a book which was originally copyrighted in 1989. It
> was recently republished, but the only visible copyright says 1989. So, my
> question is, when a book is republished, does it *have* to have a new
> copyright, or is what I've just described common, newly published, but
with
> an older copyright?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 8/3/2005
>
>
Other related posts:
