[bksvol-discuss] Re: bottlenecks in submitting and validating

  • From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:31:56 -0700 (PDT)


I laughed out loud. I assume you're kidding. 
Nonficton, unless it's history or biography, is not
one of my favorite subjects to tackle.  And being in
as bad shape as you describe--I take that as a
warning. Only when you advise that it needs some work
or a pair of eyes, as you did with Out of Body, will I
take it on. If you, with your K1000, say it's so bad,
and it's not a classic or a decent romance (not in the
morality sense but in the literary and reputation
sense) I'll let it go to the reject pile.

But you did give me a good laugh.


--- "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am rejecting "The War on Women's Rights".  I know
> it was submitted in kes 
> format so I know it was scanned with k1000.  It
> started life as a 97% 
> accurate document.  I spent five hours getting it up
> to 98% accuracy.
> Cindy I know you want to jump in and correct this
> one.  I also know it was 
> done by a well educated person with access to good
> software tools.  This is 
> not a romance novel.  Large segments of the book are
> not readable at all.
> I will hang on to the downloaded zip copy of the
> original document.  This 
> book needs re-scanning.  Please understand I only
> reject books which really 
> are in bad shape.  This one qualifies.
> E.

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

Other related posts: