[bksvol-discuss] Re: bottlenecks in submitting and validating

  • From: "Gary Petraccaro" <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:16:22 -0400

Good for you.  It's hard to reject a badly done book.  From your previous 
description, I wonder if it wasn't done with RTK.  One of RTK's trademarks is 
to turn the dash in a compound word into an m, i.e., watermproof.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: E. 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 9:09 AM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: bottlenecks in submitting and validating

  I am rejecting "The War on Women's Rights".  I know it was submitted in kes 
  format so I know it was scanned with k1000.  It started life as a 97% 
  accurate document.  I spent five hours getting it up to 98% accuracy.

  Cindy I know you want to jump in and correct this one.  I also know it was 
  done by a well educated person with access to good software tools.  This is 
  not a romance novel.  Large segments of the book are not readable at all.

  I will hang on to the downloaded zip copy of the original document.  This 
  book needs re-scanning.  Please understand I only reject books which really 
  are in bad shape.  This one qualifies.


Other related posts: