Hi, Cindy. That might not be a bad idea, but since the default rating is fair, even though I've had a bad experience with the books in question, I'd still feel guilty about rejecting a book I hadn't at least looked over first to make sure it warranted that rejection. Take care. Julie Morales Email and Windows/MSN Messenger: inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a rainbow in your heart. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:46 AM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Paring the Download Validation list Having finally finished the book I was validating, I went to the download list to see what I might want to do next (though I'm waiting to see what books from the Fair list Marissa will send me). Those romance books that people have been complaining about and that I was willing to try to fix, if I could obtain the books, are all in txt. Until the hard page break question is answered, i.e., do we need them or is spacing between the page numbers and text o.k. -- but then what about the breaks that Word puts in where they don't belong? -- I don't want to tackle them. If they are bad, why don't we just reject them? People who want to read the books can scan them and submit them as rtf, and more of us can then validate them. And that would decrease the number of books on the list considerably, it seems to me, just from quickly eyeing how many there were, not just txt in general but those. Cindy __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good. http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com