Roger, unless you're releasing a book because it just doesn't interest you, please consider rejection as an option if the quality is poor. If it's so garbled that you can't validate it, we can't fix it either. With few exceptions, releasing a book with serious issues just leaves it for the next volunteer to deal with until someone finally rejects it. This is a practice that wastes so much of our time. It's like taking a jug of milk from the fridge, finding out it's sour, and putting it back in the fridge for your spouse to find instead of pouring the sour milk down the sink. Unless a validater has access to a book to rescan pages, books of very poor quality really should be rejected rather than released. Of course, if you have contact with the submitter, he or she can replace pages for you. But then you wouldn't need to release the book in the first place. (grin) -- Monica Willyard Visit my blog at http://www.scannersguild.com To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.