[bksvol-discuss] Re: Why?
- From: "Bob W" <rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 10:28:17 -0500
Hi Roger et al,
Concerning contractors proofreading their own scans, don't forget the final
step in the approval process, administrative approval.
I would be a tad bit more careful in my submissions if my employer approved
my submissions.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 9:33 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Why?
Actually, I kind of dislike the term deranged perfectionist. It seems to me
to be a contradiction in terms. Putting that aside, though, I do wonder
about the justification for the policy that people who are under contract
with Bookshare can proofread their own submissions. I don't know anything
about how one gets such a contract, but I would suppose that they must show
some kind of evidence that they are good at what they are doing. However, it
seems to me that the same arguments would apply to them that apply to
volunteers. Just because one has signed a contract does not mean that they
have reached a state of perfection. Even the best proofreader can still miss
something that someone else might catch. Even the best submitter has a
vested interest in their own work.
_ _ _
"Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and
evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the
lack of evidence." - Richard Dawkins
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/rogerbailey81
The Militant:
http://www.themilitant.com
Pathfinder Press:
http://www.pathfinderpress.com
Granma International:
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Syfert" <goodproofing2010@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 6:48 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Why?
Deranged perfectionist? Who's deranged? You better believe it!! (evil
smile).
________________________________
From: Kim Friedman <kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 6:13 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Why?
Message
Hi,
Jamie's right. I remember proofreading a book and running it through the
spell-checker before sending it up for approval and was startled to find
that I
needed to add some spaces to the book or something like that. Due to the
Braille
display not being recognized, I hadn't been aware of how the line looked
based
on what I heard. I can see why Bookshare insists on two people overseeing
the
processing of the file, one to submit and one to proofread. And if you have
two
deranged perfectionists on a given project, submitter and proofreader, then
that
book will be as near perfect as we can make it, barring stupid things like
typographical errors or missing words left out by the publisher. Regards,
Kim
Friedman.
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jamie Yates, CPhT
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011
10:08 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Why?
It's true that if you scan the
book you have the book to proofread with, but I think, in the beginning,
there
were very few sighted volunteers for Bookshare. So a person without sight
couldn't really compare it with the print book, right?
And then, too,
it's always good to have a second pair of eyes (um, or fingers or ears,
sorry!)
to look something over. I am in general a pretty careful scanner but I have
several times submitted a book that was missing pages and it's my custom to
page
down through the file counting page numbers to make sure they are all there.
I
even once submitted a book that had a chunk of pages twice.
It's like
when you read a book that has errors in the print--your eyes see what they
want
to see and not what is really there. So sometimes you don't even see the
mistakes.
And of course there are scanners (like me) who don't read every
word of what they scan, and there are proofreaders who don't read every word
of
what they proof. So two sets of eyes on the job are better than
one.
--
Jamie in Michigan
Currently Reading: Child 44 by Tom Rob Smith
See everything I've read
this year at: www.michiganrxtech.com/books.html
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
