[bksvol-discuss] Re: When to Reject!!
- From: "Merrill Louise" <STARBASEWILDGOOSE@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:54:35 -0400
Yes, Sarah, you would have to cancel the pretend accept if you just wanted
to get a rating and then start the process all over again to actually reject
the book, but it would give you a rating if you, like me, had no other way
to do it.
Merrill Louise, Pastor
The Judson Fellowship
Jamestown, New York
cell/office 716.969.2840
"With all my heart I praise the Lord, and I am glad because of God my
Savior. (Luke 1:46-47)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Van Oosterwijck" <curiousentity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 1:53 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: When to Reject!!
> Yes, that would be a good idea, but I am afraid it wouldn't work. The
> accept or reject choice is on the first page, and the quality rating is on
> the second. the only thing you could do would be to cancel the second
page
> instead of completing the process if you wanted to reject.
>
> Sarah Van Oosterwijck
> http://home.earthlink.net/~netentity
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Merrill Louise" <STARBASEWILDGOOSE@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:46 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: When to Reject!!
>
>
> > Readability is so subjective. Is reading the book this way workable for
> > you? You could go through the first page of the acceptance process and
see
> > how the automatic evaluator program rates the book. You can accept or
> reject
> > at that point. That might give you an additional piece of information.
> > Merrill Louise, Pastor
> > The Judson Fellowship
> > Jamestown, New York
> > cell/office 716.969.2840
> > "With all my heart I praise the Lord, and I am glad because of God my
> > Savior. (Luke 1:46-47)
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike Pietruk" <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:52 PM
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] When to Reject!!
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I am now validating a novel on which I have to decide whether the text
> is
> > > readable enough or not. The book is all there, I can follow the
story,
> > > but there are a lot of words scrambled and missing. Where does one
draw
> > > the line between accepting it as a fair book or canning it?
> > > It has been sitting in the pool for a couple of months with no one
> > > touching it. The book is scanned by a frequent contributor though
this
> > > particular book doesn't come up to what has been done by this
individual
> > > in the past.
> > >
> > > I could easily return it to the pool; but this likely would place the
> book
> > > in limbo for who knows how long?
> > >
> > > So, how poor does fair text have to be to be bad text?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Other related posts:
