[bksvol-discuss] Re: Verifying a copyright
- From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Lisa,
Yes, we're supposed to use the latest date, but the
latest *copyright* date. In this case, since her time
hasn't expired and the content of the book hasn't
changed, Barbara Bretton still holds the copyright.
The only thing that has changed is the format of the
content.
Sometimes a book will be published with an
introduction or foreward by someone else, and that
person copyrights the new info but the original author
still holds the copyright on the main content. In the
book I'm validating now, the only thing copyrighted
seems to be the Introduction, which is new. Apparently
the original was never copyrighted, either by the
author or the original publisher. If that does turn
out to be true, I'll have to ask Gustavo what to do.
Anyway, Gerald is right and the copyright date should
be 2001 and the holder, Barbara Bretton.
Cindy
--- Lisa Belville <lisab12@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Copyright C 2001 by Barbara Bretton.
>
> All rights reserved.
>
> This is a work of fiction. Names, characters,
> places, and incidents
>
> either are the product of the author's imagination
> or are used
>
> fictitiously, and any resemblance to actual persons,
> living or dead,
>
> business establishments, events, or locales is
> entirely coincidental.
>
> Published in 2004 by arrangement with The Berkley
> Publishing
>
> Group, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
>
> Wheeler Large Print Softcover.
>
> The text of this Large Print edition is unabridged.
>
> Other aspects of the book may vary from the original
> edition.
>
> Set in 16 pt. Plantin by Carleen Stearns.
>
> Printed in the United States on permanent paper.
>
>
>
> This is followed by the Library of Congress
> cataloging Data.
>
>
>
> Lisa
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerald Hovas" <GeraldHovas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:22 AM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Verifying a copyright
>
>
> > Lisa,
> >
> > Copyright and publication date aren't the same
> thing, so it's possible
> > that
> > using the 2004 date may be Gustavo's problem. Use
> the most recent date
> > specified by the copyright statement and the
> holder associated with that
> > date. Also, copy the copyright statement into the
> comments so Gustavo can
> > see it easily when he approves the book. That
> should help get the book
> > approved.
> >
> > If you have any problems determining what
> information should be entered on
> > the form, then copy the copyright statement into
> an e-mail and ask the
> > list.
> >
> > BTW, it's new material added to the book that
> affects the copyright, not
> > how
> > many pages are used to print the book.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Gerald
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Lisa Belville
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:03 AM
> > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Verifying a copyright
> >
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I just downloaded A Safe Place To Fall by Barbara
> Bretton.
> >
> > This book has been kicked back to step one three
> times because Gustavo had
> > questions about the copyright. Since I can't see
> what the other three
> > validators put in the copyright field, and since I
> don't know specifically
> > what is being questioned, I can't say for sure
> that the information they
> > submitted is incorrect.
> >
> > I just checked with www.copyright.gov, and the
> book is there with the same
> > copyright date of 2001 which appears on the first
> page of the book I
> > downloaded. However, on the second or third page
> of the book is a
> > notation
> > that this edition is the large print edition
> published in 2004 by
> > Thorndike
> > Press, so it has more pages than the edition
> listed on the copyright web
> > site. Everything else checks out, though.
> >
> > assuming one or all of the validators confirmed
> this information, is there
> > any reason why the copyright info. would be
> questioned? I'm thinking that
> > perhaps they didn't notice the revised publication
> date of 2004, which, if
> > I
> >
> > remember correctly is the date we should be using?
> >
> > Besides that, the book is a good scan and should
> be easy to validate. I
> > just want to be sure I've got the copyright issue
> straightened out before
> > I
> > dive in.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Lisa
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note, Effective Immediately:
> > My New E-mail Address is
> > lisab12@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
> to
> > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the
> subject line. To get a list
> > of
> > available commands, put the word 'help' by itself
> in the subject line.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
> to
> > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the
> subject line. To get a list
> > of available commands, put the word 'help' by
> itself in the subject line.
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject
> line. To get a list of available commands, put the
> word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
