[bksvol-discuss] Re: Validating ARK files

  • From: Pam Quinn <quinn.family@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:15:42 -0500

So does that mean they will let you upload the validated file back in
.rtf then?


>That's exactly what I do. I only use Openbook to open the file and save it 
>as rtf. I do all my editing in K1000.
>And I also replace the single quotes to apostrophes and double quotes to 
>quotation mark.
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Pam Quinn" <quinn.family@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 9:06 PM
>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Validating ARK files
>> What you could do is just open the .ark file, save it as an .rtf file,
>> and then you could still do your editing in k1000. One thing I'd do
>> once you get it over to k1000, is do a search and replace for all of
>> the apostrophes and then all of the quotes. Because Open Book saves
>> quotes in this weird character so that if a person later chooses to
>> save the file in .txt format, the quotes don't save with it.
>> Pam
>>>Hello.  I have been reading the comments on the number of ARK books on the
>>>download list.  I have OpenBook 7.02, but have stayed so far with K1000
>>>because everyone says it is much easier.  I'd like to try an ARK file,
>>>since there are several that sound interesting.  Is there anything in
>>>particular I need to watch for.  I guess what I am asking is, what makes
>>>Kurzweil easier than OpenBook.  Any thoughts or comments before I tackle 
>>>next book?  Thanks.
>>>Mary Stephens
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.1/28 - Release Date: 6/24/2005

Other related posts: