That's a neat idea E -- and to add to that perhaps instead of numbers the volunteer who wishes to remain anonymous can choose to enter an alias? That would probably be faster than having the system assign a number -- and perhaps more fun (smile). Those who prefer the generic "Bookshare Volunteer" will of course still be free to enter just that. Great to have everyone weighing in on the topic-- on this end we've put in the request to the engineering team to make the addition. It will probably not be possible for them to change the existing site, given their current workload, but it will definitely be a part of the next version. All good things, Pavi -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of E. Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:49 AM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bksvol-discuss] VALIDATORS and SUBMITTERS stay private with numbers perhaps I bring up a idea for keeping a submitter or validator "private" while still giving out the kind of information useful to the bookshare community. If a volunteer wishes to remain private he or she may ask for a volunteer number. Then anyone can tell that such and such a book is submitted by bsv123 and validated by bsv 456. The identity remains private. People who know those particular volunteers do good work will still know that. Everybody benefits. E. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.