[bksvol-discuss] Re: Txt romances
- From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 01:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Jana, if you do, please post what you're planning to
rescan. I have several for which I can obtain the
books from my library and I'm planning to validate
them -- but I'm not wedded to the idea. I'm only doing
it so they won't get lost. If I don't enjoy them 'll
reject them. So if you re-scan one of the ones I have
on mh computer I'll reject it.
Cindy
--- Jana Jackson <jana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I totally agree! The thing is, I'd really like to
> read some of those books,
> too. Guess I'll have to take a trip to the library
> soon and re-scan some of
> them. <Smile>
>
> Jana
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Julie Morales
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 12:40 AM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Txt romances
>
>
> Oh, Joanie, I totally understand! I've gotten
> really irritated with them,
> too...not the person, per se, so please no one get
> defensive, but the books
> themselves and the poor quality of the submissions,
> and frankly, if that
> many of my books were rejected, I'd be wanting to
> know why and try to get
> help to make it better. That's just me, though. Take
> care.
> Julie Morales
> inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
> mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Skype: mercy0421
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: CJ Vining
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 1:19 AM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Txt romances
>
>
> I have to agree; I've given up on them, because
> along with the poor
> quality scans, often the category and other fields
> are left blank, there
> isn't a synopsis, and I don't like having to search
> for *all* of the
> important information about a book. It seems like
> the one submitting it, who
> presumably cares about the book should care enough
> to do that. I wonder why
> the submitter doesn't clean up the files before
> sending them in... and why
> that person doesn't wonder why their books are so
> often rejected.
>
> Joanie, who has a lot of stored up irritation
> about this
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Julie Morales
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 9:34 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Txt romances
>
>
> Hi, Gisela. You're braver than I! *smile* I've
> taken a few of those
> Txt romances and won't touch them again. The last
> one I took I rejected, and
> I think I've rejected every one I've touched, so I
> won't touch them any
> more. *smile* They're rated fair and deserve the
> rating, if not something
> even less than that if there could be such a thing.
> I don't mind putting
> some work into my validations. That's why we're
> here, but when so much of it
> is totally incomprehensible, I can't deal with that.
> *smile* Take care.
> Julie Morales
> inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
> mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Skype: mercy0421
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gisela Vazquez
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 4:20 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: submitting
> Star Wars novel
>
>
> no I guess someone els took it. I'll be
> looking for it. I'm actually
> trying to validate those txt romances though i've
> rejected as many as I've
> excepted. I think that makes it two for two.
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
Other related posts:
