Especially since submitters get five times as much credit than validators. Cindy --- Barbara <barbarab65@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree people who submit books should be encouraged > to read the books that they submit before submitting > them so that they are in the best shape possible. If > would be nice if submitters could indicate whether > they have read the book and cleaned it up before > they have submitted it in order to let potential > validators know how much time they will need to > spend on a book. This would make validating so much > easier. Right now, I am reading all the books I > validate to much sure that they are as perfect as I > can get them and this is really time consuming, but > fun. I am not complaining but if you want to speed > up the process, people need to read the books and > correct them before they submit them. > > Barbara > > "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I suggest that some of the older books may > actually be in pretty poor > shape. This is only a hunch. It comes from having > gone through some > of the older books on the list lately. > > > The validation process was thought of originally as > just a checking > out of the book. Submitters, particularly those > submitting "heavier > reading" please need to create the best original > they can. > > A larger pool of validators might mean speedier > turnover of books, > getting them off step 1. A larger pool of validators > also will mean > some of us will take on some of the nonfiction or > other titles, just > out of a law of percentages. > > Economic incentive may help too as you point out > applied to books on > step one for, perhaps nine months or more. > > E. > At 06:36 PM 5/15/2007, you wrote: > >Elizabeth's messages about the older books on step > 1 got me to look > >at the step 1 page this evening to see what I could > do to help > >out. Looking at the titles has got me wondering > about > >something. Many of these books are either > textbooks, essays, or > >other heavy nonfiction titles. I think most of us > avoid working on > >books like this. I'm trying to find a solution to > this problem. Do > >you think it might work to give validaters some > sort of double > >credit for working on books that are over a year > old? Or for > >textbooks since that's what many of these titles > are? As I looked > >at the oldest books, my reaction was a groan > because validating them > >would be tedious and boring to me. While some of > our members do > >enjoy that type of material, I don't think I'm > alone in my > >feelings. Would receiving double credit be an > incentive for you > >personally? I'd like to know what you all think of > my idea because > >I will suggest it to John if it has merrit. Does > anyone have other > >ideas for encouraging people to process our more > scholarly titles? > > > > > >"Don't let yesterday use up too much of today!" > Will Rogers > >Monica Willyard, rhyami@xxxxxxxxx > >Add rhyami to your Skype if you'd like to chat. > >To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > >bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a > >list of available commands, put the word 'help' by > itself in the subject line. > > > > > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / > Virus Database: > >269.7.1/805 - Release Date: 5/15/2007 10:47 AM > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of available commands, put the > word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.